Thomas G Maloney, Zachary S Anderson, Ashley B Vincent, Adam L Magiera, Philip C Slocum
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病患者胡佛征与最大呼气吸气压比的关系","authors":"Thomas G Maloney, Zachary S Anderson, Ashley B Vincent, Adam L Magiera, Philip C Slocum","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) some patients develop paradoxical inspiratory rib motion, which is termed Hoover's sign. Our objective was to determine whether Hoover's sign is associated with a difference in the maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), the MEP/MIP ratio, and other features on pulmonary function tests (PFTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational prospective single-center cohort study enrolled patients with an established diagnosis of COPD with Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 3 (severe) and 4 (very severe) based on PFTs. Respiratory pressure measurements were also collected. Patients were examined for the presence or absence of Hoover's sign on physical examination by 2 internal medicine resident physicians trained in examining for Hoover's sign by a pulmonologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 patients were examined for the presence of Hoover's sign. Hoover's sign was present in 49.3% of patients. Observer agreement (k statistic) was 0.8 for Hoover's sign. Median MEP/MIP was significantly greater in patients with Hoover's sign than those without Hoover's sign (1.88 versus 1.16, <i>p</i><0.001). Patients with Hoover's sign also had a significantly lower MIP (39.0 versus 58.0, <i>p</i><0.001) and higher residual volume (RV) to total lung capacity (TLC) ratio indicating a higher degree of air trapping (65 versus 59.5, <i>p</i><0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of Hoover's sign in patients with COPD is associated with a higher MEP/MIP ratio. This suggests respiratory pressure measurements can predict diaphragm dysfunction in patients with GOLD stage 3 and 4 COPD. Patients with Hoover's sign were also found to have a lower MIP and more air trapping.</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9995237/pdf/JCOPDF-10-001.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Hoover's Sign with Maximal Expiratory-to-Inspiratory Pressure Ratio in Patients with COPD.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas G Maloney, Zachary S Anderson, Ashley B Vincent, Adam L Magiera, Philip C Slocum\",\"doi\":\"10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) some patients develop paradoxical inspiratory rib motion, which is termed Hoover's sign. Our objective was to determine whether Hoover's sign is associated with a difference in the maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), the MEP/MIP ratio, and other features on pulmonary function tests (PFTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational prospective single-center cohort study enrolled patients with an established diagnosis of COPD with Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 3 (severe) and 4 (very severe) based on PFTs. Respiratory pressure measurements were also collected. Patients were examined for the presence or absence of Hoover's sign on physical examination by 2 internal medicine resident physicians trained in examining for Hoover's sign by a pulmonologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 patients were examined for the presence of Hoover's sign. Hoover's sign was present in 49.3% of patients. Observer agreement (k statistic) was 0.8 for Hoover's sign. Median MEP/MIP was significantly greater in patients with Hoover's sign than those without Hoover's sign (1.88 versus 1.16, <i>p</i><0.001). Patients with Hoover's sign also had a significantly lower MIP (39.0 versus 58.0, <i>p</i><0.001) and higher residual volume (RV) to total lung capacity (TLC) ratio indicating a higher degree of air trapping (65 versus 59.5, <i>p</i><0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of Hoover's sign in patients with COPD is associated with a higher MEP/MIP ratio. This suggests respiratory pressure measurements can predict diaphragm dysfunction in patients with GOLD stage 3 and 4 COPD. Patients with Hoover's sign were also found to have a lower MIP and more air trapping.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9995237/pdf/JCOPDF-10-001.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0341\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association of Hoover's Sign with Maximal Expiratory-to-Inspiratory Pressure Ratio in Patients with COPD.
Purpose: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) some patients develop paradoxical inspiratory rib motion, which is termed Hoover's sign. Our objective was to determine whether Hoover's sign is associated with a difference in the maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), the MEP/MIP ratio, and other features on pulmonary function tests (PFTs).
Methods: This observational prospective single-center cohort study enrolled patients with an established diagnosis of COPD with Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 3 (severe) and 4 (very severe) based on PFTs. Respiratory pressure measurements were also collected. Patients were examined for the presence or absence of Hoover's sign on physical examination by 2 internal medicine resident physicians trained in examining for Hoover's sign by a pulmonologist.
Results: A total of 71 patients were examined for the presence of Hoover's sign. Hoover's sign was present in 49.3% of patients. Observer agreement (k statistic) was 0.8 for Hoover's sign. Median MEP/MIP was significantly greater in patients with Hoover's sign than those without Hoover's sign (1.88 versus 1.16, p<0.001). Patients with Hoover's sign also had a significantly lower MIP (39.0 versus 58.0, p<0.001) and higher residual volume (RV) to total lung capacity (TLC) ratio indicating a higher degree of air trapping (65 versus 59.5, p<0.014).
Conclusion: The presence of Hoover's sign in patients with COPD is associated with a higher MEP/MIP ratio. This suggests respiratory pressure measurements can predict diaphragm dysfunction in patients with GOLD stage 3 and 4 COPD. Patients with Hoover's sign were also found to have a lower MIP and more air trapping.