重复剖腹产或引产

Sarah Vause , Stelios Christodoulou
{"title":"重复剖腹产或引产","authors":"Sarah Vause ,&nbsp;Stelios Christodoulou","doi":"10.1016/j.rigapp.2006.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Obstetricians frequently need to decide whether to induce a woman who has previously been delivered by Caesarean section (LSCS). There is very little evidence from randomised controlled trials to aid their decision making. Observational studies, with their inherent flaws, suggest a 3.6% maternal complication rate in women undergoing repeat elective LSCS, and approximately 66% </span>vaginal delivery rate and 1% </span>uterine rupture rate in women who were induced. There is little evidence to guide the choice of </span>induction agent. Various factors have been suggested to predict a successful vaginal delivery, but a previous vaginal delivery appears to be strongly predictive of a good outcome. Alternative strategies, such as stretching and sweeping the membranes or awaiting spontaneous labour, may reduce the need for induction. If labour is induced in a woman with a scarred uterus we should ensure that the high risk situation is not compounded by poor care in labour.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101088,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Gynaecological and Perinatal Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigapp.2006.04.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeat Caesarean section or induction of labour\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Vause ,&nbsp;Stelios Christodoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rigapp.2006.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Obstetricians frequently need to decide whether to induce a woman who has previously been delivered by Caesarean section (LSCS). There is very little evidence from randomised controlled trials to aid their decision making. Observational studies, with their inherent flaws, suggest a 3.6% maternal complication rate in women undergoing repeat elective LSCS, and approximately 66% </span>vaginal delivery rate and 1% </span>uterine rupture rate in women who were induced. There is little evidence to guide the choice of </span>induction agent. Various factors have been suggested to predict a successful vaginal delivery, but a previous vaginal delivery appears to be strongly predictive of a good outcome. Alternative strategies, such as stretching and sweeping the membranes or awaiting spontaneous labour, may reduce the need for induction. If labour is induced in a woman with a scarred uterus we should ensure that the high risk situation is not compounded by poor care in labour.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Gynaecological and Perinatal Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigapp.2006.04.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Gynaecological and Perinatal Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871232006000174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Gynaecological and Perinatal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871232006000174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

产科医生经常需要决定是否诱导曾经剖腹产(LSCS)的妇女。几乎没有来自随机对照试验的证据来帮助他们做出决策。观察性研究虽然存在固有缺陷,但表明接受重复选择性LSCS的女性产妇并发症发生率为3.6%,而接受诱导的女性阴道分娩率约为66%,子宫破裂率约为1%。很少有证据指导诱导剂的选择。预测阴道分娩成功的因素有很多,但以前的阴道分娩似乎是预测良好结果的有力因素。其他策略,如拉伸和清扫膜或等待自然分娩,可能会减少引产的需要。如果子宫有疤痕的妇女引产,我们应该确保高危情况不会因分娩时护理不良而加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Repeat Caesarean section or induction of labour

Obstetricians frequently need to decide whether to induce a woman who has previously been delivered by Caesarean section (LSCS). There is very little evidence from randomised controlled trials to aid their decision making. Observational studies, with their inherent flaws, suggest a 3.6% maternal complication rate in women undergoing repeat elective LSCS, and approximately 66% vaginal delivery rate and 1% uterine rupture rate in women who were induced. There is little evidence to guide the choice of induction agent. Various factors have been suggested to predict a successful vaginal delivery, but a previous vaginal delivery appears to be strongly predictive of a good outcome. Alternative strategies, such as stretching and sweeping the membranes or awaiting spontaneous labour, may reduce the need for induction. If labour is induced in a woman with a scarred uterus we should ensure that the high risk situation is not compounded by poor care in labour.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents The evidence for the use of cervical cerclage Chronic pelvic pain: Aetiology and therapy Optimising in vitro fertilisation (IVF) outcome in women with endometriosis Antenatal prevention of neonatal group B streptococcal infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1