{"title":"膝动脉栓塞数据回顾","authors":"Aiden M. O'Grady MBChB, Mark W. Little FRCR","doi":"10.1016/j.tvir.2022.100880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Osteoarthritis<span> of the knee poses an ever-expanding healthcare challenge worldwide. Current treatments include conservative methods such as weight loss, pharmacological treatments including </span></span>NSAIDs<span>, and surgical techniques including total knee arthroplasty. Although frequently successful, contraindications and failure of pharmacological agents leave many, especially with mild-moderate disease, without effective treatment. Genicular </span></span>artery embolization<span><span><span><span> is an interventional radiology technique being developed to fill this treatment gap. For this procedure to become established, the literature must provide evidence of its underlying scientific principles, safety, efficacy and economic viability. Pathological investigation of osteoarthritis reveals that low-level inflammation plays a crucial role in disease development. Joint inflammation stimulates neoangiogenesis and accompanying neuronal growth, with the degree of microvascular invasion being correlated with more severe pain in animal models. These neovessels provide a target for </span>embolization<span> however, the microscopic effects of this intervention are yet to be elucidated. The side effects of GAE have been extensively investigated with no severe adverse events being recorded. Skin discoloration<span> and puncture site hematoma are the most common, occurring in 10%-65% and 0%-17% of patients respectively. The literature also discusses ways to minimize these events. Phase one studies provide promising evidence of efficacy, demonstrating an 80% improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a mean difference of 36.8 in </span></span></span>Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at 24-months. These positive signals are also supported by a single </span>randomized control trial. A single study has been completed regarding the cost of GAE, however further work is needed. The GAE literature demonstrates a safe procedure with promising initial evidence of efficacy. Future work should further elucidate the pathology of osteoarthritis and ways in which embolization modifies this process, alongside providing further randomized control evidence that aligns with the recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The future of GAE is exciting!</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51613,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genicular Artery Embolization Data Review\",\"authors\":\"Aiden M. O'Grady MBChB, Mark W. Little FRCR\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tvir.2022.100880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Osteoarthritis<span> of the knee poses an ever-expanding healthcare challenge worldwide. Current treatments include conservative methods such as weight loss, pharmacological treatments including </span></span>NSAIDs<span>, and surgical techniques including total knee arthroplasty. Although frequently successful, contraindications and failure of pharmacological agents leave many, especially with mild-moderate disease, without effective treatment. Genicular </span></span>artery embolization<span><span><span><span> is an interventional radiology technique being developed to fill this treatment gap. For this procedure to become established, the literature must provide evidence of its underlying scientific principles, safety, efficacy and economic viability. Pathological investigation of osteoarthritis reveals that low-level inflammation plays a crucial role in disease development. Joint inflammation stimulates neoangiogenesis and accompanying neuronal growth, with the degree of microvascular invasion being correlated with more severe pain in animal models. These neovessels provide a target for </span>embolization<span> however, the microscopic effects of this intervention are yet to be elucidated. The side effects of GAE have been extensively investigated with no severe adverse events being recorded. Skin discoloration<span> and puncture site hematoma are the most common, occurring in 10%-65% and 0%-17% of patients respectively. The literature also discusses ways to minimize these events. Phase one studies provide promising evidence of efficacy, demonstrating an 80% improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a mean difference of 36.8 in </span></span></span>Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at 24-months. These positive signals are also supported by a single </span>randomized control trial. A single study has been completed regarding the cost of GAE, however further work is needed. The GAE literature demonstrates a safe procedure with promising initial evidence of efficacy. Future work should further elucidate the pathology of osteoarthritis and ways in which embolization modifies this process, alongside providing further randomized control evidence that aligns with the recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The future of GAE is exciting!</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1089251622000865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1089251622000865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Osteoarthritis of the knee poses an ever-expanding healthcare challenge worldwide. Current treatments include conservative methods such as weight loss, pharmacological treatments including NSAIDs, and surgical techniques including total knee arthroplasty. Although frequently successful, contraindications and failure of pharmacological agents leave many, especially with mild-moderate disease, without effective treatment. Genicular artery embolization is an interventional radiology technique being developed to fill this treatment gap. For this procedure to become established, the literature must provide evidence of its underlying scientific principles, safety, efficacy and economic viability. Pathological investigation of osteoarthritis reveals that low-level inflammation plays a crucial role in disease development. Joint inflammation stimulates neoangiogenesis and accompanying neuronal growth, with the degree of microvascular invasion being correlated with more severe pain in animal models. These neovessels provide a target for embolization however, the microscopic effects of this intervention are yet to be elucidated. The side effects of GAE have been extensively investigated with no severe adverse events being recorded. Skin discoloration and puncture site hematoma are the most common, occurring in 10%-65% and 0%-17% of patients respectively. The literature also discusses ways to minimize these events. Phase one studies provide promising evidence of efficacy, demonstrating an 80% improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and a mean difference of 36.8 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at 24-months. These positive signals are also supported by a single randomized control trial. A single study has been completed regarding the cost of GAE, however further work is needed. The GAE literature demonstrates a safe procedure with promising initial evidence of efficacy. Future work should further elucidate the pathology of osteoarthritis and ways in which embolization modifies this process, alongside providing further randomized control evidence that aligns with the recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The future of GAE is exciting!
期刊介绍:
Interventional radiology is an area of clinical diagnosis and management that is highly technique-oriented. Therefore, the format of this quarterly journal, which combines the visual impact of an atlas with the currency of a journal, lends itself perfectly to presenting the topics. Each issue is guest edited by a leader in the field and is focused on a single clinical technique or problem. The presentation is enhanced by superb illustrations and descriptive narrative outlining the steps of a particular procedure. Interventional radiologists, neuroradiologists, vascular surgeons and neurosurgeons will find this a useful addition to the clinical literature.