喉咽重建:当前指南和实践标准的全球回顾。是否存在通用的重构算法?

Mohammad Mohammad, Dimovelis Giannis, Mostafa Ashraf, Machin Aenone Harper
{"title":"喉咽重建:当前指南和实践标准的全球回顾。是否存在通用的重构算法?","authors":"Mohammad Mohammad, Dimovelis Giannis, Mostafa Ashraf, Machin Aenone Harper","doi":"10.23937/2378-3656/1410409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The reconstruction of hypopharynx and larynx post ablative surgery has been always a demanding challenge. Not only the restoration of the anatomy and achieving robust wound healing, but also the complexity of function in the area for the airway and upper digestive tract not to be compromised. Moreover, the age of this group of patients and perioperative radiotherapy adds to the existing obstacles in reconstruction. The evolution of microsurgery and free tissue transfer replacing the previous gold standard pedicled flaps revolutionized the head and neck reconstruction. It became a necessity to elicit how far the head and neck reconstruction practice has gone around the globe and what is considered the gold standard technique for reconstruction of each of the defects encountered at the present time. We performed a systematic review appraising the current head and neck reconstruction practice around the world aiming at concluding the gold standard methods of reconstruction of the defects in this area. Methods: Search strategy: Medline using the PubMed interface on 1st of October 2020. Results and search outcome: 236 papers were found. Of which 66 publications in the last 10 years were shortlisted reflecting the most recent practice. 20 of these were identified addressing the reconstructive approach Figure 1. Conclusions: Various reconstructive methods are reliably used in certain indications with comparable results around the globe. We present an unprecedented evidence-based universal algorithm for post ablative surgery reconstruction for the laryngeal and pharyngeal defects.","PeriodicalId":10450,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laryngeal and Pharyngeal Reconstruction: A Worldwide Review of the Current Guidelines and Standards of Practice. Does a Universal Reconstruction Algorithm Exist?\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Mohammad, Dimovelis Giannis, Mostafa Ashraf, Machin Aenone Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2378-3656/1410409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The reconstruction of hypopharynx and larynx post ablative surgery has been always a demanding challenge. Not only the restoration of the anatomy and achieving robust wound healing, but also the complexity of function in the area for the airway and upper digestive tract not to be compromised. Moreover, the age of this group of patients and perioperative radiotherapy adds to the existing obstacles in reconstruction. The evolution of microsurgery and free tissue transfer replacing the previous gold standard pedicled flaps revolutionized the head and neck reconstruction. It became a necessity to elicit how far the head and neck reconstruction practice has gone around the globe and what is considered the gold standard technique for reconstruction of each of the defects encountered at the present time. We performed a systematic review appraising the current head and neck reconstruction practice around the world aiming at concluding the gold standard methods of reconstruction of the defects in this area. Methods: Search strategy: Medline using the PubMed interface on 1st of October 2020. Results and search outcome: 236 papers were found. Of which 66 publications in the last 10 years were shortlisted reflecting the most recent practice. 20 of these were identified addressing the reconstructive approach Figure 1. Conclusions: Various reconstructive methods are reliably used in certain indications with comparable results around the globe. We present an unprecedented evidence-based universal algorithm for post ablative surgery reconstruction for the laryngeal and pharyngeal defects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3656/1410409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3656/1410409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要下咽及喉部消融术后的重建一直是一项艰巨的挑战。不仅要恢复解剖结构,实现强健的伤口愈合,而且要使该区域的功能复杂性不受气道和上消化道的损害。此外,这组患者的年龄和围手术期放疗增加了重建的障碍。显微外科手术的发展和自由组织移植取代了以前的金标准带蒂皮瓣,彻底改变了头颈部重建。有必要引出头颈部重建实践在全球范围内走了多远,以及目前遇到的每个缺陷重建的黄金标准技术是什么。我们进行了一项系统的回顾,评估了目前世界各地的头颈部重建实践,旨在总结出该地区缺陷重建的金标准方法。方法:检索策略:Medline,于2020年10月1日使用PubMed接口。结果与检索结果:共检索到236篇论文。其中,过去10年中有66种出版物入围,反映了最新的做法。其中20个被确定为处理重构方法(图1)。结论:各种重建方法在某些适应症中可靠地使用,并且在全球范围内具有可比性。我们提出了一种前所未有的基于证据的通用算法,用于喉咽缺损的消融手术后重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laryngeal and Pharyngeal Reconstruction: A Worldwide Review of the Current Guidelines and Standards of Practice. Does a Universal Reconstruction Algorithm Exist?
Introduction: The reconstruction of hypopharynx and larynx post ablative surgery has been always a demanding challenge. Not only the restoration of the anatomy and achieving robust wound healing, but also the complexity of function in the area for the airway and upper digestive tract not to be compromised. Moreover, the age of this group of patients and perioperative radiotherapy adds to the existing obstacles in reconstruction. The evolution of microsurgery and free tissue transfer replacing the previous gold standard pedicled flaps revolutionized the head and neck reconstruction. It became a necessity to elicit how far the head and neck reconstruction practice has gone around the globe and what is considered the gold standard technique for reconstruction of each of the defects encountered at the present time. We performed a systematic review appraising the current head and neck reconstruction practice around the world aiming at concluding the gold standard methods of reconstruction of the defects in this area. Methods: Search strategy: Medline using the PubMed interface on 1st of October 2020. Results and search outcome: 236 papers were found. Of which 66 publications in the last 10 years were shortlisted reflecting the most recent practice. 20 of these were identified addressing the reconstructive approach Figure 1. Conclusions: Various reconstructive methods are reliably used in certain indications with comparable results around the globe. We present an unprecedented evidence-based universal algorithm for post ablative surgery reconstruction for the laryngeal and pharyngeal defects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delirium Improving Symptoms of Chronic Schizophrenia in Elderly: A Case Series De Winter Syndrome Secondary to a Blunt Chest Trauma Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Therapeutic Challenge When Eculizumab is Not Available Giant Acquired Fibrokeratoma of the Big Toe: A Case Report QuantiFERON in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1