澳大利亚的传统和补充医学:临床实践、研究、教育和监管

D. Bhuyan, I. Dissanayake, Kayla Jaye, Dennis Chang
{"title":"澳大利亚的传统和补充医学:临床实践、研究、教育和监管","authors":"D. Bhuyan, I. Dissanayake, Kayla Jaye, Dennis Chang","doi":"10.4103/ijar.ijar_4_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different modalities of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) are extensively used worldwide including Australia to treat ailments, maintain well-being either alone or in conjunction with conventional medicine. This wide prevalence also emphasizes the necessity for more research, education and regulation of different T&CM modalities to ensure their safety and efficacy. While several reports in the literature highlight different aspects of T&CM including clinical practice, research, education and regulation globally, recent comprehensive reviews on the current status of T&CM in Australia are limited. Therefore, this review was designed to critically analyze the literature on the present status of T&CM modalities including Traditional Chinese Medicine, chiropractic, naturopathy and Ayurveda in Australia and comprehensively summarize the key studies from an Australian perspective. Several key gaps in the evidence-based clinical practice (e.g., lack of patient-focused approach and communication between patients and health professionals), research (e.g., methodological flaws/inconsistencies, limited government funding, collaborative research, facilities, capability, and resources), education (e.g., lack of uniform minimum standard of education and limited courses) and regulation (e.g., self-regulated naturopathy) of T&CM in Australia were identified through this review. Furthermore, studies in the literature underlined that some T&CM modalities including naturopathy and Ayurveda require statutory and updated regulations, formal registration and proper training and education. A patient-focused approach in clinical practice and the generation of evidence through collaborative research (establishment of more practice-based research networks) among universities, T&CM industry and practitioners and more support from the government to conduct research and improve training and education are imperative for effective evidence-based practice of T&CM in Australia.","PeriodicalId":88901,"journal":{"name":"International journal of Ayurveda research","volume":"7 1","pages":"16 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traditional and complementary medicine in Australia: Clinical practice, research, education, and regulation\",\"authors\":\"D. Bhuyan, I. Dissanayake, Kayla Jaye, Dennis Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijar.ijar_4_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Different modalities of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) are extensively used worldwide including Australia to treat ailments, maintain well-being either alone or in conjunction with conventional medicine. This wide prevalence also emphasizes the necessity for more research, education and regulation of different T&CM modalities to ensure their safety and efficacy. While several reports in the literature highlight different aspects of T&CM including clinical practice, research, education and regulation globally, recent comprehensive reviews on the current status of T&CM in Australia are limited. Therefore, this review was designed to critically analyze the literature on the present status of T&CM modalities including Traditional Chinese Medicine, chiropractic, naturopathy and Ayurveda in Australia and comprehensively summarize the key studies from an Australian perspective. Several key gaps in the evidence-based clinical practice (e.g., lack of patient-focused approach and communication between patients and health professionals), research (e.g., methodological flaws/inconsistencies, limited government funding, collaborative research, facilities, capability, and resources), education (e.g., lack of uniform minimum standard of education and limited courses) and regulation (e.g., self-regulated naturopathy) of T&CM in Australia were identified through this review. Furthermore, studies in the literature underlined that some T&CM modalities including naturopathy and Ayurveda require statutory and updated regulations, formal registration and proper training and education. A patient-focused approach in clinical practice and the generation of evidence through collaborative research (establishment of more practice-based research networks) among universities, T&CM industry and practitioners and more support from the government to conduct research and improve training and education are imperative for effective evidence-based practice of T&CM in Australia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of Ayurveda research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of Ayurveda research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijar.ijar_4_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of Ayurveda research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijar.ijar_4_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

包括澳大利亚在内的世界各地广泛使用不同形式的传统和补充医学(T&CM)来治疗疾病,保持健康,无论是单独还是与传统医学结合使用。这种广泛的流行也强调有必要对不同的T&CM模式进行更多的研究、教育和监管,以确保其安全性和有效性。虽然文献中的一些报告强调了T&CM的不同方面,包括临床实践、研究、教育和全球监管,但最近对澳大利亚T&CM现状的全面审查是有限的。因此,本综述旨在批判性地分析澳大利亚中医、脊椎指压疗法、自然疗法和阿育吠陀疗法等T&CM疗法的现状,并从澳大利亚的角度全面总结关键研究。通过本综述,确定了澳大利亚中医循证临床实践(例如,缺乏以患者为中心的方法和患者与卫生专业人员之间的沟通)、研究(例如,方法缺陷/不一致、政府资助有限、合作研究、设施、能力和资源)、教育(例如,缺乏统一的最低教育标准和有限的课程)和监管(例如,自我调节的自然疗法)方面的几个关键差距。此外,文献研究强调,包括自然疗法和阿育吠陀在内的一些中医模式需要法定和更新的法规、正式注册和适当的培训和教育。在临床实践中采取以患者为中心的方法,并通过大学、T&CM行业和从业者之间的合作研究(建立更多基于实践的研究网络)来产生证据,以及政府更多地支持进行研究和改进培训和教育,这些都是澳大利亚T&CM有效的循证实践所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Traditional and complementary medicine in Australia: Clinical practice, research, education, and regulation
Different modalities of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) are extensively used worldwide including Australia to treat ailments, maintain well-being either alone or in conjunction with conventional medicine. This wide prevalence also emphasizes the necessity for more research, education and regulation of different T&CM modalities to ensure their safety and efficacy. While several reports in the literature highlight different aspects of T&CM including clinical practice, research, education and regulation globally, recent comprehensive reviews on the current status of T&CM in Australia are limited. Therefore, this review was designed to critically analyze the literature on the present status of T&CM modalities including Traditional Chinese Medicine, chiropractic, naturopathy and Ayurveda in Australia and comprehensively summarize the key studies from an Australian perspective. Several key gaps in the evidence-based clinical practice (e.g., lack of patient-focused approach and communication between patients and health professionals), research (e.g., methodological flaws/inconsistencies, limited government funding, collaborative research, facilities, capability, and resources), education (e.g., lack of uniform minimum standard of education and limited courses) and regulation (e.g., self-regulated naturopathy) of T&CM in Australia were identified through this review. Furthermore, studies in the literature underlined that some T&CM modalities including naturopathy and Ayurveda require statutory and updated regulations, formal registration and proper training and education. A patient-focused approach in clinical practice and the generation of evidence through collaborative research (establishment of more practice-based research networks) among universities, T&CM industry and practitioners and more support from the government to conduct research and improve training and education are imperative for effective evidence-based practice of T&CM in Australia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive review of Pāṭhabheda (variant readings) in Carakasaṁhitā Vaidya Saadhana: Dharmaparo Bhavet (act righteously) Artificial intelligence in the sector of Ayurveda: Scope and opportunities Use of Ayush measures and advocacies by Ayush practitioners and health seekers for the prevention of coronavirus disease-19: Cross-sectional analysis of an application-based data Preparation and preliminary physicochemical profile of Kaphaketu rasa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1