Аn关于选择性堕胎的伦理问题概述

Todorka Boeva, R. Laleva
{"title":"Аn关于选择性堕胎的伦理问题概述","authors":"Todorka Boeva, R. Laleva","doi":"10.14748/VMF.V10I2.7967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Аbortion has been a controversial issue throughout human history and has been determined according to the socio-economic conditions, moral and religious norms of different societies. It has been practiced at all times and by all peoples. The purpose of this examination is to investigate and analyse the literature related to the ethical and legal options for the woman. For the world at large, at the moment the attitude is extremely contradictory - from a total ban to full acceptance. The moderate opinion allows abortion in certain symptoms according to the period of pregnancy, rejecting full liberalisation as unethical. In twenty European states optional abortion is lawful. In the rest seven members (U.K., Finland and Cyprus) is allowed a broad interpretation of the grounds for refusal, (Ireland, Poland and Luxembourg) restrictive interpretation of the grounds for refusal and complete unwillingness or fear of performing abortions, lead to extremely rare (reported) legal abortions if any. In Bulgarian, the attitude towards abortion goes through a ban and upward liberalization. In the 1950s, abortion was banned, except on strict medical grounds. At a later stage, this problem was again discussed, and in the 1990 s the conditions for voluntary abortion were completel liberalised. Conclusion The bottom line is that a dual strategy is needed. In the event of an accident, adequate, accessible, safe and legal abortion services must be provided. On the other hand, every woman should be given the opportunity to prevent unwanted pregnancies by provided information, training, counseling, affordable contraceptive services and the provision of a wide variety of reliable, safe, acceptable methods of contraception.","PeriodicalId":23566,"journal":{"name":"Varna Medical Forum","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Аn overview of the ethical issues of optional abortion\",\"authors\":\"Todorka Boeva, R. Laleva\",\"doi\":\"10.14748/VMF.V10I2.7967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Аbortion has been a controversial issue throughout human history and has been determined according to the socio-economic conditions, moral and religious norms of different societies. It has been practiced at all times and by all peoples. The purpose of this examination is to investigate and analyse the literature related to the ethical and legal options for the woman. For the world at large, at the moment the attitude is extremely contradictory - from a total ban to full acceptance. The moderate opinion allows abortion in certain symptoms according to the period of pregnancy, rejecting full liberalisation as unethical. In twenty European states optional abortion is lawful. In the rest seven members (U.K., Finland and Cyprus) is allowed a broad interpretation of the grounds for refusal, (Ireland, Poland and Luxembourg) restrictive interpretation of the grounds for refusal and complete unwillingness or fear of performing abortions, lead to extremely rare (reported) legal abortions if any. In Bulgarian, the attitude towards abortion goes through a ban and upward liberalization. In the 1950s, abortion was banned, except on strict medical grounds. At a later stage, this problem was again discussed, and in the 1990 s the conditions for voluntary abortion were completel liberalised. Conclusion The bottom line is that a dual strategy is needed. In the event of an accident, adequate, accessible, safe and legal abortion services must be provided. On the other hand, every woman should be given the opportunity to prevent unwanted pregnancies by provided information, training, counseling, affordable contraceptive services and the provision of a wide variety of reliable, safe, acceptable methods of contraception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Varna Medical Forum\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Varna Medical Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14748/VMF.V10I2.7967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Varna Medical Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14748/VMF.V10I2.7967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Аbortion在整个人类历史上一直是一个有争议的问题,并根据不同社会的社会经济条件、道德和宗教规范来确定。所有时代和所有民族都在实践它。本考试的目的是调查和分析与妇女的道德和法律选择有关的文献。对于整个世界来说,目前的态度是非常矛盾的——从完全禁止到完全接受。温和的意见允许根据怀孕期间的某些症状进行堕胎,反对完全自由化,认为这是不道德的。在20个欧洲国家,选择性堕胎是合法的。其余7个成员国(英国、芬兰和塞浦路斯)允许对拒绝堕胎的理由作出宽泛的解释,(爱尔兰、波兰和卢森堡)对拒绝堕胎的理由作出限制性解释,完全不愿意或害怕堕胎,导致极为罕见的合法堕胎(如果有的话)。在保加利亚,对堕胎的态度经历了禁令和向上自由化的过程。在20世纪50年代,堕胎是被禁止的,除非有严格的医学理由。在后来的阶段,这个问题再次被讨论,并在20世纪90年代完全放开了自愿堕胎的条件。底线是双重策略是必要的。在发生事故时,必须提供充分、方便、安全和合法的堕胎服务。另一方面,每个妇女都应该有机会通过提供信息、培训、咨询、负担得起的避孕服务和提供各种可靠、安全、可接受的避孕方法来预防意外怀孕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Аn overview of the ethical issues of optional abortion
Аbortion has been a controversial issue throughout human history and has been determined according to the socio-economic conditions, moral and religious norms of different societies. It has been practiced at all times and by all peoples. The purpose of this examination is to investigate and analyse the literature related to the ethical and legal options for the woman. For the world at large, at the moment the attitude is extremely contradictory - from a total ban to full acceptance. The moderate opinion allows abortion in certain symptoms according to the period of pregnancy, rejecting full liberalisation as unethical. In twenty European states optional abortion is lawful. In the rest seven members (U.K., Finland and Cyprus) is allowed a broad interpretation of the grounds for refusal, (Ireland, Poland and Luxembourg) restrictive interpretation of the grounds for refusal and complete unwillingness or fear of performing abortions, lead to extremely rare (reported) legal abortions if any. In Bulgarian, the attitude towards abortion goes through a ban and upward liberalization. In the 1950s, abortion was banned, except on strict medical grounds. At a later stage, this problem was again discussed, and in the 1990 s the conditions for voluntary abortion were completel liberalised. Conclusion The bottom line is that a dual strategy is needed. In the event of an accident, adequate, accessible, safe and legal abortion services must be provided. On the other hand, every woman should be given the opportunity to prevent unwanted pregnancies by provided information, training, counseling, affordable contraceptive services and the provision of a wide variety of reliable, safe, acceptable methods of contraception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Key Apoptosis Signaling Pathways In Malignant Diseases Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis Effect of Anethole on Visceral Obesity and Serum Triglycerides and Cholesterol Levels in Rats on a High-Calorie Diet Effects Of Melatonin Suplementation On Body Mass Index In A Diet-Induced Obesity Rat Model Bilateral Olfactory Bulbectomy (OBX) as a Model of Depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1