版权侵权授权原则及其对《2010年数字经济法》条款和效果的影响

Q4 Social Sciences International Journal of Private Law Pub Date : 2014-09-23 DOI:10.1504/IJPL.2014.064930
Md. Imamunur Rahman
{"title":"版权侵权授权原则及其对《2010年数字经济法》条款和效果的影响","authors":"Md. Imamunur Rahman","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2014.064930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The doctrine of authorisation of copyright infringement is a well-established principle in copyright law. However, the courts have not been unanimous about its scope. This uncertainty led into enacting a highly contentious piece of legislation, the Digital Economy Act 2010, in the UK. This article examines the development of the doctrine of authorisation and assesses the circumstances in which the legislation was passed. This article also gives an overview of this controversial piece of legislation, including its origins and development and whether the legislation is effective to achieve its aims.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The doctrine of authorisation of copyright infringement and its influence on the terms and effect of the Digital Economy Act 2010\",\"authors\":\"Md. Imamunur Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2014.064930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The doctrine of authorisation of copyright infringement is a well-established principle in copyright law. However, the courts have not been unanimous about its scope. This uncertainty led into enacting a highly contentious piece of legislation, the Digital Economy Act 2010, in the UK. This article examines the development of the doctrine of authorisation and assesses the circumstances in which the legislation was passed. This article also gives an overview of this controversial piece of legislation, including its origins and development and whether the legislation is effective to achieve its aims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.064930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.064930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

著作权侵权授权原则是著作权法中一项确立已久的原则。然而,法院对其范围并没有达成一致意见。这种不确定性导致英国颁布了一项极具争议的立法——《2010年数字经济法》。本文考察了授权原则的发展,并评估了立法通过的情况。本文还概述了这一有争议的立法,包括它的起源和发展,以及立法是否有效地实现了其目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The doctrine of authorisation of copyright infringement and its influence on the terms and effect of the Digital Economy Act 2010
The doctrine of authorisation of copyright infringement is a well-established principle in copyright law. However, the courts have not been unanimous about its scope. This uncertainty led into enacting a highly contentious piece of legislation, the Digital Economy Act 2010, in the UK. This article examines the development of the doctrine of authorisation and assesses the circumstances in which the legislation was passed. This article also gives an overview of this controversial piece of legislation, including its origins and development and whether the legislation is effective to achieve its aims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The evolution of the non-oral modification clause Legal regulation of migration policy in EU countries: current challenges The application of the concept of consideration to smart contracts on a blockchain. The propriety of mandatory arbitration in Nigeria vis-à-vis the doctrine of voluntariness: the imperativeness of charting a new course The evolution of the non-oral modification clause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1