基于伽马谱比的嵌入式震源深度评估方法开发研究

Jun-Ha Kim, Jea-Hak Cheong, Sangbum Hong, B. Seo, B. Lee
{"title":"基于伽马谱比的嵌入式震源深度评估方法开发研究","authors":"Jun-Ha Kim, Jea-Hak Cheong, Sangbum Hong, B. Seo, B. Lee","doi":"10.7733/jnfcwt.2020.18.1.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to develop a method for depth assessment of embedded sources using gamma-spectrum ratio and for the evaluation of field applicability. To this end, Peak to Compton and Peak to valley ratio changes were evaluated according to 137Cs, 60Co, 152Eu point source depth using HPGe detector and MCNP simulation. The effects of measurement distance of PTV and PTC methods were evaluated. Using the results, the source depth assessment equation using the PTC and PTV methods was derived based on the detection distance of 50 cm. In addition, the sensitivity of detection distance changes was assessed when using PTV and PTC methods, and error increased by 3 to 4 cm when detection distance decreased by 20 cm based on 50 cm. However, it was confirmed that if the detection distance was increased to 100 cm, the effects of detection distance were small. And PTV and PTC methods were compared with the two distance measurement method which evaluates the depth of source by the change of net peak counting rate according to the detection distance. As a result of source depth assessment, the PTV and PTC showed a maximum error of 1.87 cm and the two distance measurement method showed maximum error of 2.69 cm. The results of the experiment confirmed that the accuracy of the PTV and PTC methods was higher than two distance measurement. In addition, Sensitivity evaluation by horizontal position error of source has maximum error of less than 25.59 cm for the two distance measurement method. On the other hand, PTV and PTC method showed high accuracy with maximum error of less than 8.04 cm. In addition, the PTC method has lowest standard deviation for the same time measurement, which is expected to enable rapid measurement.","PeriodicalId":17456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"51-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on Development of Embedded Source Depth Assessment Method Using Gamma Spectrum Ratio\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Ha Kim, Jea-Hak Cheong, Sangbum Hong, B. Seo, B. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.7733/jnfcwt.2020.18.1.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conducted to develop a method for depth assessment of embedded sources using gamma-spectrum ratio and for the evaluation of field applicability. To this end, Peak to Compton and Peak to valley ratio changes were evaluated according to 137Cs, 60Co, 152Eu point source depth using HPGe detector and MCNP simulation. The effects of measurement distance of PTV and PTC methods were evaluated. Using the results, the source depth assessment equation using the PTC and PTV methods was derived based on the detection distance of 50 cm. In addition, the sensitivity of detection distance changes was assessed when using PTV and PTC methods, and error increased by 3 to 4 cm when detection distance decreased by 20 cm based on 50 cm. However, it was confirmed that if the detection distance was increased to 100 cm, the effects of detection distance were small. And PTV and PTC methods were compared with the two distance measurement method which evaluates the depth of source by the change of net peak counting rate according to the detection distance. As a result of source depth assessment, the PTV and PTC showed a maximum error of 1.87 cm and the two distance measurement method showed maximum error of 2.69 cm. The results of the experiment confirmed that the accuracy of the PTV and PTC methods was higher than two distance measurement. In addition, Sensitivity evaluation by horizontal position error of source has maximum error of less than 25.59 cm for the two distance measurement method. On the other hand, PTV and PTC method showed high accuracy with maximum error of less than 8.04 cm. In addition, the PTC method has lowest standard deviation for the same time measurement, which is expected to enable rapid measurement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"51-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2020.18.1.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2020.18.1.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在开发一种利用伽马谱比对嵌入式信号源进行深度评估和现场适用性评估的方法。为此,利用HPGe探测器和MCNP模拟,对137Cs、60Co、152Eu点源深度的峰谷比和峰康普顿比变化进行了评价。对PTV法和PTC法测量距离的影响进行了评价。在此基础上,推导了基于50 cm探测距离的PTC法和PTV法震源深度评价方程。此外,对PTV法和PTC法检测距离变化的灵敏度进行了评估,在50 cm的基础上,检测距离减小20 cm,误差增加3 ~ 4 cm。但经证实,如果将探测距离增加到100 cm,探测距离的影响较小。并将PTV法和PTC法与两种根据探测距离变化的净峰值计数率来评价震源深度的距离测量方法进行了比较。源深度评估结果显示,PTV和PTC测量方法的最大误差为1.87 cm,两种距离测量方法的最大误差为2.69 cm。实验结果证实了PTV和PTC方法的精度高于两种距离测量方法。另外,两种距离测量方法以源水平位置误差评价灵敏度的最大误差均小于25.59 cm。另一方面,PTV和PTC方法具有较高的准确度,最大误差小于8.04 cm。此外,PTC方法在同一时间测量中具有最低的标准偏差,有望实现快速测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study on Development of Embedded Source Depth Assessment Method Using Gamma Spectrum Ratio
This study was conducted to develop a method for depth assessment of embedded sources using gamma-spectrum ratio and for the evaluation of field applicability. To this end, Peak to Compton and Peak to valley ratio changes were evaluated according to 137Cs, 60Co, 152Eu point source depth using HPGe detector and MCNP simulation. The effects of measurement distance of PTV and PTC methods were evaluated. Using the results, the source depth assessment equation using the PTC and PTV methods was derived based on the detection distance of 50 cm. In addition, the sensitivity of detection distance changes was assessed when using PTV and PTC methods, and error increased by 3 to 4 cm when detection distance decreased by 20 cm based on 50 cm. However, it was confirmed that if the detection distance was increased to 100 cm, the effects of detection distance were small. And PTV and PTC methods were compared with the two distance measurement method which evaluates the depth of source by the change of net peak counting rate according to the detection distance. As a result of source depth assessment, the PTV and PTC showed a maximum error of 1.87 cm and the two distance measurement method showed maximum error of 2.69 cm. The results of the experiment confirmed that the accuracy of the PTV and PTC methods was higher than two distance measurement. In addition, Sensitivity evaluation by horizontal position error of source has maximum error of less than 25.59 cm for the two distance measurement method. On the other hand, PTV and PTC method showed high accuracy with maximum error of less than 8.04 cm. In addition, the PTC method has lowest standard deviation for the same time measurement, which is expected to enable rapid measurement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermodynamic Study of Sequential Chlorination for Spent Fuel Partitioning Proposal of Application Method for Concentration Averaging of Radioactive Waste in Korea by Using CA BTP of US NRC Parametric Study for Structural Reinforcement Methods of Disposal Container for NPP Decommissioning Radioactive Waste An Analysis of Constraints on Pyroprocessing Technology Development in ROK Under the US Nonproliferation Policy A Method to Estimate the Burnup Using Initial Enrichment, Cooling Time, Total Neutron Source Intensity and Gamma Source Activities in Spent Fuels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1