吸附式制冷系统中不同质量回收过程的热力学分析与性能模拟

Q. Pan, Ruzhu Wang, Zisheng Lu, Liwei Wang
{"title":"吸附式制冷系统中不同质量回收过程的热力学分析与性能模拟","authors":"Q. Pan, Ruzhu Wang, Zisheng Lu, Liwei Wang","doi":"10.1080/10789669.2014.889512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mass recovery process is an efficient way to improve the performance of adsorption refrigeration system. By researching two kinds of conventional mass recovery cycle (i.e., mass recovery between two beds [TBMRC] and between evaporators [TEMRC]), double mass recovery cycle (DMRC) is proposed to reduce heat loss. Thermodynamic analysis shows that the heat loss of DMRC is less than the other two kinds. Consequently, DMRC system performance should be the best, followed by TEMRC and TBMRC as the worst. A mathematical model of heat and mass transfer was then built and simulation was performed to analyze the system performance. The simulation results show that the optimal cycle time and mass recovery time are 30 mins and 10 s, respectively. Compared with the basic cycle, both coefficient of performance and specific cooling power of mass recovery cycle are much better. The system performance of different kinds of mass recovery cycle is almost the same in most cases, caused by a small reduction of heat loss in DMRC or TEMRC, when compared with the cooling capacity and heating power. However, under some conditions (i.e., large cycle time or high evaporation temperature), performance of DMRC is better than the other two kinds, which is consistent with the thermodynamic analysis results.","PeriodicalId":13238,"journal":{"name":"HVAC&R Research","volume":"61 1","pages":"311 - 319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermodynamic analysis and performance simulation of different kinds of mass recovery processes applied in adsorption refrigeration system\",\"authors\":\"Q. Pan, Ruzhu Wang, Zisheng Lu, Liwei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10789669.2014.889512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mass recovery process is an efficient way to improve the performance of adsorption refrigeration system. By researching two kinds of conventional mass recovery cycle (i.e., mass recovery between two beds [TBMRC] and between evaporators [TEMRC]), double mass recovery cycle (DMRC) is proposed to reduce heat loss. Thermodynamic analysis shows that the heat loss of DMRC is less than the other two kinds. Consequently, DMRC system performance should be the best, followed by TEMRC and TBMRC as the worst. A mathematical model of heat and mass transfer was then built and simulation was performed to analyze the system performance. The simulation results show that the optimal cycle time and mass recovery time are 30 mins and 10 s, respectively. Compared with the basic cycle, both coefficient of performance and specific cooling power of mass recovery cycle are much better. The system performance of different kinds of mass recovery cycle is almost the same in most cases, caused by a small reduction of heat loss in DMRC or TEMRC, when compared with the cooling capacity and heating power. However, under some conditions (i.e., large cycle time or high evaporation temperature), performance of DMRC is better than the other two kinds, which is consistent with the thermodynamic analysis results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HVAC&R Research\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"311 - 319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HVAC&R Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2014.889512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HVAC&R Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2014.889512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

质量回收工艺是提高吸附式制冷系统性能的有效途径。通过研究两种常规质量回收循环(即两层间质量回收[TBMRC]和蒸发器间质量回收[TEMRC]),提出了双质量回收循环(DMRC)以减少热损失。热力学分析表明,DMRC的热损失小于其他两种材料。因此,DMRC系统性能最好,其次是TEMRC和TBMRC。建立了传热传质数学模型,并对系统性能进行了仿真分析。仿真结果表明,最佳循环时间为30 min,最佳质量回收时间为10 s。与基本循环相比,质量回收循环的性能系数和比冷功率都要高得多。在大多数情况下,不同质量回收循环的系统性能几乎相同,这是由于与制冷量和加热功率相比,DMRC或TEMRC的热损失减少较少。然而,在某些条件下(如大循环时间或高蒸发温度),DMRC的性能优于其他两种,这与热力学分析结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thermodynamic analysis and performance simulation of different kinds of mass recovery processes applied in adsorption refrigeration system
Mass recovery process is an efficient way to improve the performance of adsorption refrigeration system. By researching two kinds of conventional mass recovery cycle (i.e., mass recovery between two beds [TBMRC] and between evaporators [TEMRC]), double mass recovery cycle (DMRC) is proposed to reduce heat loss. Thermodynamic analysis shows that the heat loss of DMRC is less than the other two kinds. Consequently, DMRC system performance should be the best, followed by TEMRC and TBMRC as the worst. A mathematical model of heat and mass transfer was then built and simulation was performed to analyze the system performance. The simulation results show that the optimal cycle time and mass recovery time are 30 mins and 10 s, respectively. Compared with the basic cycle, both coefficient of performance and specific cooling power of mass recovery cycle are much better. The system performance of different kinds of mass recovery cycle is almost the same in most cases, caused by a small reduction of heat loss in DMRC or TEMRC, when compared with the cooling capacity and heating power. However, under some conditions (i.e., large cycle time or high evaporation temperature), performance of DMRC is better than the other two kinds, which is consistent with the thermodynamic analysis results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HVAC&R Research
HVAC&R Research 工程技术-工程:机械
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
EOV Editorial Board The never-ending search Accelerating fast fluid dynamics with a coarse-grid projection scheme Numerical modeling of volatile organic compound emissions from ozone reactions with human-worn clothing in an aircraft cabin Dynamic simulation and analysis of ancillary service demand response strategies for variable air volume HVAC systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1