外推稀疏的金标准死因名称来描述更广泛的流域

Q3 Mathematics Epidemiologic Methods Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1515/em-2019-0031
R. Lyles, S. Cunningham, Suprateek Kundu, Q. Bassat, I. Mandomando, C. Sacoor, Victor Akelo, D. Onyango, Emily Zielinski-Gutierrez, Allan W. Taylor
{"title":"外推稀疏的金标准死因名称来描述更广泛的流域","authors":"R. Lyles, S. Cunningham, Suprateek Kundu, Q. Bassat, I. Mandomando, C. Sacoor, Victor Akelo, D. Onyango, Emily Zielinski-Gutierrez, Allan W. Taylor","doi":"10.1515/em-2019-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network is designed to elucidate and track causes of under-5 child mortality and stillbirth in multiple sites in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia using advanced surveillance, laboratory and pathology methods. Expert panels provide an arguable gold standard determination of underlying cause of death (CoD) on a subset of child deaths, in part through examining tissue obtained via minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) procedures. We consider estimating a population-level distribution of CoDs based on this sparse but precise data, in conjunction with data on subgrouping characteristics that are measured on the broader population of cases and are potentially associated with selection for MITS and with cause-specific mortality. Methods We illustrate how estimation of each underlying CoD proportion using all available data can be addressed equivalently in terms of a Horvitz-Thompson adjustment or a direct standardization, uncovering insights relevant to the designation of appropriate subgroups to adjust for non-representative sampling. Taking advantage of the functional form of the result when expressed as a multinomial distribution-based maximum likelihood estimator, we propose small-sample adjustments to Bayesian credible intervals based on Jeffreys or related weakly informative Dirichlet prior distributions. Results Our analyses of early data from CHAMPS sites in Kenya and Mozambique and accompanying simulation studies demonstrate the validity of the adjustment approach under attendant assumptions, together with marked performance improvements associated with the proposed adjusted Bayesian credible intervals. Conclusions Adjustment for non-representative sampling of those validated via gold standard diagnostic methods is a critical endeavor for epidemiologic studies like CHAMPS that seek extrapolation of CoD proportion estimates.","PeriodicalId":37999,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extrapolating sparse gold standard cause of death designations to characterize broader catchment areas\",\"authors\":\"R. Lyles, S. Cunningham, Suprateek Kundu, Q. Bassat, I. Mandomando, C. Sacoor, Victor Akelo, D. Onyango, Emily Zielinski-Gutierrez, Allan W. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/em-2019-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives The Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network is designed to elucidate and track causes of under-5 child mortality and stillbirth in multiple sites in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia using advanced surveillance, laboratory and pathology methods. Expert panels provide an arguable gold standard determination of underlying cause of death (CoD) on a subset of child deaths, in part through examining tissue obtained via minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) procedures. We consider estimating a population-level distribution of CoDs based on this sparse but precise data, in conjunction with data on subgrouping characteristics that are measured on the broader population of cases and are potentially associated with selection for MITS and with cause-specific mortality. Methods We illustrate how estimation of each underlying CoD proportion using all available data can be addressed equivalently in terms of a Horvitz-Thompson adjustment or a direct standardization, uncovering insights relevant to the designation of appropriate subgroups to adjust for non-representative sampling. Taking advantage of the functional form of the result when expressed as a multinomial distribution-based maximum likelihood estimator, we propose small-sample adjustments to Bayesian credible intervals based on Jeffreys or related weakly informative Dirichlet prior distributions. Results Our analyses of early data from CHAMPS sites in Kenya and Mozambique and accompanying simulation studies demonstrate the validity of the adjustment approach under attendant assumptions, together with marked performance improvements associated with the proposed adjusted Bayesian credible intervals. Conclusions Adjustment for non-representative sampling of those validated via gold standard diagnostic methods is a critical endeavor for epidemiologic studies like CHAMPS that seek extrapolation of CoD proportion estimates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiologic Methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiologic Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2019-0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2019-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

儿童健康和死亡预防监测(CHAMPS)网络旨在利用先进的监测、实验室和病理学方法,阐明和跟踪撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚多个地点5岁以下儿童死亡和死产的原因。专家小组通过检查通过微创组织取样(MITS)程序获得的组织,对一部分儿童死亡的潜在死因(CoD)提供了一个有争议的金标准。我们考虑根据这些稀疏但精确的数据,结合在更广泛的病例群体中测量的亚组特征数据,估计CoDs的人口水平分布,这些数据可能与MITS的选择和病因特异性死亡率有关。我们说明了如何使用所有可用数据来估计每个潜在的CoD比例,可以根据Horvitz-Thompson调整或直接标准化来等效地解决问题,揭示了与指定适当的子组以调整非代表性抽样相关的见解。利用结果的函数形式表示为基于多项分布的极大似然估计量,我们提出了基于Jeffreys或相关弱信息Dirichlet先验分布的贝叶斯可信区间的小样本调整。我们对肯尼亚和莫桑比克CHAMPS站点的早期数据进行了分析,并进行了相应的模拟研究,结果表明,在相应的假设下,调整方法的有效性,以及与所提出的调整贝叶斯可信区间相关的显著性能改进。通过金标准诊断方法验证的非代表性样本的调整对于像CHAMPS这样寻求CoD比例估计值外推的流行病学研究是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extrapolating sparse gold standard cause of death designations to characterize broader catchment areas
Abstract Objectives The Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network is designed to elucidate and track causes of under-5 child mortality and stillbirth in multiple sites in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia using advanced surveillance, laboratory and pathology methods. Expert panels provide an arguable gold standard determination of underlying cause of death (CoD) on a subset of child deaths, in part through examining tissue obtained via minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) procedures. We consider estimating a population-level distribution of CoDs based on this sparse but precise data, in conjunction with data on subgrouping characteristics that are measured on the broader population of cases and are potentially associated with selection for MITS and with cause-specific mortality. Methods We illustrate how estimation of each underlying CoD proportion using all available data can be addressed equivalently in terms of a Horvitz-Thompson adjustment or a direct standardization, uncovering insights relevant to the designation of appropriate subgroups to adjust for non-representative sampling. Taking advantage of the functional form of the result when expressed as a multinomial distribution-based maximum likelihood estimator, we propose small-sample adjustments to Bayesian credible intervals based on Jeffreys or related weakly informative Dirichlet prior distributions. Results Our analyses of early data from CHAMPS sites in Kenya and Mozambique and accompanying simulation studies demonstrate the validity of the adjustment approach under attendant assumptions, together with marked performance improvements associated with the proposed adjusted Bayesian credible intervals. Conclusions Adjustment for non-representative sampling of those validated via gold standard diagnostic methods is a critical endeavor for epidemiologic studies like CHAMPS that seek extrapolation of CoD proportion estimates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Methods
Epidemiologic Methods Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Methods (EM) seeks contributions comparable to those of the leading epidemiologic journals, but also invites papers that may be more technical or of greater length than what has traditionally been allowed by journals in epidemiology. Applications and examples with real data to illustrate methodology are strongly encouraged but not required. Topics. genetic epidemiology, infectious disease, pharmaco-epidemiology, ecologic studies, environmental exposures, screening, surveillance, social networks, comparative effectiveness, statistical modeling, causal inference, measurement error, study design, meta-analysis
期刊最新文献
Linked shrinkage to improve estimation of interaction effects in regression models. Bounds for selection bias using outcome probabilities Population dynamic study of two prey one predator system with disease in first prey using fuzzy impulsive control Development and application of an evidence-based directed acyclic graph to evaluate the associations between metal mixtures and cardiometabolic outcomes. Performance evaluation of ResNet model for classification of tomato plant disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1