慢性血液透析患者胸内动脉心肌血管重建手术后冠状动脉-锁骨下动脉盗血的影响:荟萃分析

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tcm.2022.12.008
Massimo Baudo , Gianluca Torregrossa , Aleksander Dokollari , Gianluigi Bisleri , Lorenzo Di Bacco , Stefano Benussi , Claudio Muneretto , Fabrizio Rosati
{"title":"慢性血液透析患者胸内动脉心肌血管重建手术后冠状动脉-锁骨下动脉盗血的影响:荟萃分析","authors":"Massimo Baudo ,&nbsp;Gianluca Torregrossa ,&nbsp;Aleksander Dokollari ,&nbsp;Gianluigi Bisleri ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Di Bacco ,&nbsp;Stefano Benussi ,&nbsp;Claudio Muneretto ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Rosati","doi":"10.1016/j.tcm.2022.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Patients in hemodialysis<span> with an arm arteriovenous fistula undergoing </span></span>coronary artery bypass grafting<span> (CABG) with an internal thoracic artery have been reported to suffer from coronary-subclavian steal (CSS) during dialysis session. However, its occurrence is still debated. A </span></span>systematic literature review<span><span> was performed to identify all studies investigating the occurrence of a CSS event in this subset of patients. The primary endpoint was the analysis of CSS and the following early and late survival outcomes. Independent determinants of CSS and the impact of the distance between the arteriovenous fistula (upper arm vs forearm) and the ipsilateral internal thoracic artery graft on CSS events and mortality were studied. Early and late survival outcomes were analyzed by comparing ipsilateral versus </span>contralateral arteriovenous fistula. Of the 1,383 retrieved articles, 10 were included (</span></span><em>n</em><span> = 643 patients). The pooled event rate of CSS was 6.46% [95%CI=2.10–18.15], while of symptomatic CSS incidence was 3.99% [95%CI=0.95–15.25]. No survival differences were noted when comparing ipsilateral to contralateral arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combinations. On meta-regression, the upper arm was associated with more CSS events, while the forearm to lower late mortality rates. Independently from arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combination, CSS was not associated to higher mortality rates. Particular attention is warranted when selecting the type of conduits for CABG in patients with an arteriovenous fistula or if highly expected to need one in the near future after surgery. A contralateral arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combination is preferable. If this is not possible, a forearm arteriovenous fistula position should be preferred.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51199,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 183-190"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of coronary-subclavian steal after surgical myocardial revascularization with internal thoracic artery in chronic hemodialysis patients: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Massimo Baudo ,&nbsp;Gianluca Torregrossa ,&nbsp;Aleksander Dokollari ,&nbsp;Gianluigi Bisleri ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Di Bacco ,&nbsp;Stefano Benussi ,&nbsp;Claudio Muneretto ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Rosati\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tcm.2022.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Patients in hemodialysis<span> with an arm arteriovenous fistula undergoing </span></span>coronary artery bypass grafting<span> (CABG) with an internal thoracic artery have been reported to suffer from coronary-subclavian steal (CSS) during dialysis session. However, its occurrence is still debated. A </span></span>systematic literature review<span><span> was performed to identify all studies investigating the occurrence of a CSS event in this subset of patients. The primary endpoint was the analysis of CSS and the following early and late survival outcomes. Independent determinants of CSS and the impact of the distance between the arteriovenous fistula (upper arm vs forearm) and the ipsilateral internal thoracic artery graft on CSS events and mortality were studied. Early and late survival outcomes were analyzed by comparing ipsilateral versus </span>contralateral arteriovenous fistula. Of the 1,383 retrieved articles, 10 were included (</span></span><em>n</em><span> = 643 patients). The pooled event rate of CSS was 6.46% [95%CI=2.10–18.15], while of symptomatic CSS incidence was 3.99% [95%CI=0.95–15.25]. No survival differences were noted when comparing ipsilateral to contralateral arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combinations. On meta-regression, the upper arm was associated with more CSS events, while the forearm to lower late mortality rates. Independently from arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combination, CSS was not associated to higher mortality rates. Particular attention is warranted when selecting the type of conduits for CABG in patients with an arteriovenous fistula or if highly expected to need one in the near future after surgery. A contralateral arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combination is preferable. If this is not possible, a forearm arteriovenous fistula position should be preferred.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 183-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050173823000026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050173823000026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有报道称,手臂动静脉瘘的血液透析患者在接受胸内动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)时,会在透析过程中出现冠状动脉-锁骨下动脉盗血(CSS)。然而,对其发生率仍存在争议。我们进行了一次系统性文献回顾,以确定所有调查该类患者发生 CSS 事件的研究。主要终点是分析 CSS 和以下早期和晚期生存结果。研究了CSS的独立决定因素以及动静脉瘘(上臂与前臂)和同侧胸内动脉移植之间的距离对CSS事件和死亡率的影响。通过比较同侧动静脉瘘和对侧动静脉瘘,分析了早期和晚期生存结果。在检索到的 1,383 篇文章中,共纳入了 10 篇(n = 643 名患者)。汇总的 CSS 事件发生率为 6.46% [95%CI=2.10-18.15],而症状性 CSS 发生率为 3.99% [95%CI=0.95-15.25]。同侧动静脉瘘-胸内动脉组合与对侧动静脉瘘-胸内动脉组合的生存率没有差异。在元回归中,上臂与更多的 CSS 事件相关,而前臂与较低的晚期死亡率相关。与动静脉瘘-胸内动脉组合无关,CSS 与较高的死亡率无关。对于动静脉瘘患者或术后短期内极有可能需要动静脉瘘的患者,在为 CABG 选择导管类型时应特别注意。最好是对侧动静脉瘘-胸内动脉组合。如果无法做到这一点,则应首选前臂动静脉瘘位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of coronary-subclavian steal after surgical myocardial revascularization with internal thoracic artery in chronic hemodialysis patients: A meta-analysis

Patients in hemodialysis with an arm arteriovenous fistula undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with an internal thoracic artery have been reported to suffer from coronary-subclavian steal (CSS) during dialysis session. However, its occurrence is still debated. A systematic literature review was performed to identify all studies investigating the occurrence of a CSS event in this subset of patients. The primary endpoint was the analysis of CSS and the following early and late survival outcomes. Independent determinants of CSS and the impact of the distance between the arteriovenous fistula (upper arm vs forearm) and the ipsilateral internal thoracic artery graft on CSS events and mortality were studied. Early and late survival outcomes were analyzed by comparing ipsilateral versus contralateral arteriovenous fistula. Of the 1,383 retrieved articles, 10 were included (n = 643 patients). The pooled event rate of CSS was 6.46% [95%CI=2.10–18.15], while of symptomatic CSS incidence was 3.99% [95%CI=0.95–15.25]. No survival differences were noted when comparing ipsilateral to contralateral arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combinations. On meta-regression, the upper arm was associated with more CSS events, while the forearm to lower late mortality rates. Independently from arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combination, CSS was not associated to higher mortality rates. Particular attention is warranted when selecting the type of conduits for CABG in patients with an arteriovenous fistula or if highly expected to need one in the near future after surgery. A contralateral arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combination is preferable. If this is not possible, a forearm arteriovenous fistula position should be preferred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine
Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
2.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine delivers comprehensive, state-of-the-art reviews of scientific advancements in cardiovascular medicine, penned and scrutinized by internationally renowned experts. The articles provide authoritative insights into various topics, encompassing basic mechanisms, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of heart and blood vessel disorders, catering to clinicians and basic scientists alike. The journal covers a wide spectrum of cardiology, offering profound insights into aspects ranging from arrhythmias to vasculopathies.
期刊最新文献
Cardio Obstetrics: bridging heart and pregnancy health. Unexplained Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young: What is Killing These Young People When Nothing is Found? Editorial commentary: Polygenic risk and coronary artery calcium score: Joining forces in preventive cardiology. Applying guidelines directed medical therapy for heart failure: The cardiologist hard job. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1