可视化地比较存储库和reprogram

Daniel Rozenberg, Ivan Beschastnikh, Fabian Kosmale, Valerie Poser, Heiko Becker, Marc Palyart, G. Murphy
{"title":"可视化地比较存储库和reprogram","authors":"Daniel Rozenberg, Ivan Beschastnikh, Fabian Kosmale, Valerie Poser, Heiko Becker, Marc Palyart, G. Murphy","doi":"10.1145/2901739.2901768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The availability of open source software projects has created an enormous opportunity for software engineering research. However, this availability requires that researchers judiciously select an appropriate set of evaluation targets and properly document this rationale. After all, the choice of targets may have a significant effect on evaluation.We developed a tool called RepoGrams to support researchers in qualitatively comparing and contrasting software projects over time using a set of software metrics. RepoGrams uses an extensible, metrics-based, visualization model that can be adapted to a variety of analyses. Through a user study of 14 software engineering researchers we found that RepoGrams can assist researchers in filtering candidate software projects and make more reasoned choices of targets for their evaluations. The tool is open source and is available online: http://repograms.net/","PeriodicalId":6621,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"122 1","pages":"109-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Repositories Visually with RepoGrams\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Rozenberg, Ivan Beschastnikh, Fabian Kosmale, Valerie Poser, Heiko Becker, Marc Palyart, G. Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2901739.2901768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The availability of open source software projects has created an enormous opportunity for software engineering research. However, this availability requires that researchers judiciously select an appropriate set of evaluation targets and properly document this rationale. After all, the choice of targets may have a significant effect on evaluation.We developed a tool called RepoGrams to support researchers in qualitatively comparing and contrasting software projects over time using a set of software metrics. RepoGrams uses an extensible, metrics-based, visualization model that can be adapted to a variety of analyses. Through a user study of 14 software engineering researchers we found that RepoGrams can assist researchers in filtering candidate software projects and make more reasoned choices of targets for their evaluations. The tool is open source and is available online: http://repograms.net/\",\"PeriodicalId\":6621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"109-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2901739.2901768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2901739.2901768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

开源软件项目的可用性为软件工程研究创造了巨大的机会。然而,这种可用性要求研究人员明智地选择一组适当的评估目标,并适当地记录这一基本原理。毕竟,目标的选择可能会对评估产生重大影响。我们开发了一个叫做reprograms的工具来支持研究人员使用一组软件度量标准对软件项目进行定性比较和对比。reprograms使用可扩展的、基于度量的可视化模型,该模型可以适应各种分析。通过对14名软件工程研究人员的用户研究,我们发现reprogram可以帮助研究人员筛选候选软件项目,并为他们的评估做出更合理的目标选择。该工具是开源的,可以在线获取:http://repograms.net/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Repositories Visually with RepoGrams
The availability of open source software projects has created an enormous opportunity for software engineering research. However, this availability requires that researchers judiciously select an appropriate set of evaluation targets and properly document this rationale. After all, the choice of targets may have a significant effect on evaluation.We developed a tool called RepoGrams to support researchers in qualitatively comparing and contrasting software projects over time using a set of software metrics. RepoGrams uses an extensible, metrics-based, visualization model that can be adapted to a variety of analyses. Through a user study of 14 software engineering researchers we found that RepoGrams can assist researchers in filtering candidate software projects and make more reasoned choices of targets for their evaluations. The tool is open source and is available online: http://repograms.net/
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MSR '20: 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 29-30 June, 2020 Who you gonna call?: analyzing web requests in Android applications Cena słońca w projektowaniu architektonicznym Multi-extract and Multi-level Dataset of Mozilla Issue Tracking History Interactive Exploration of Developer Interaction Traces using a Hidden Markov Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1