{"title":"机械关节仪、虚拟关节仪和下颌跟踪仪测量髁突矢状倾角的比较研究。","authors":"Liya Ma, Fei Liu, Jiansong Mei, Jiarui Chao, Zhenyu Wang, Jiefei Shen","doi":"10.4047/jap.2023.15.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the sagittal condylar inclination (SCI) in dentate individuals measured by the different methods with mechanical articulator (MA), virtual articulator (VA), and a jaw tracking device (JTD) system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 22 healthy dentate participants were enrolled in this study. For MA workflow, the SCI was obtained by a semi-adjustable articulator with protrusive interocclusal records. The SCI was also set on a VA by aligning intraoral scan (IOS) with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and facial scan (FS), respectively. These virtual workflows were conducted in a dental design software, namely VA<sub>IOS-CBCT</sub> and VA<sub>IOS-FS</sub>. Meanwhile, a JTD system was also utilized to perform the measurement. Intraclass correlation was used to assess the repeatability within workflows. The bilateral SCI values were compared by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test for each workflow, and Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc p-value Bonferroni correction were used to compare the differences among four workflows. The agreement of VA<sub>IOS-CBCT</sub>, VA<sub>IOS-FS</sub>, and JTD compared with MA was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraclass correlation of the SCI revealed a high degree of repeatability for each workflow. There were no significant differences between the left and right sides (<i>P</i> > .05), except for VA<sub>IOS-CBCT</sub> (<i>P</i> = .028). Significant differences were not found between MA and VA<sub>IOS-FS</sub> (<i>P</i> > .05). Bland-Altman plots indicated VA<sub>IOS-CBCT</sub>, VA<sub>IOS-FS</sub>, and JTD were considered to substitute MA with high 95% limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The workflow of VA<sub>IOS-FS</sub> provided an alternative approach to measure the SCI compared with MA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/3d/jap-15-11.PMC9992698.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study to measure the sagittal condylar inclination using mechanical articulator, virtual articulator and jaw tracking device.\",\"authors\":\"Liya Ma, Fei Liu, Jiansong Mei, Jiarui Chao, Zhenyu Wang, Jiefei Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.4047/jap.2023.15.1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the sagittal condylar inclination (SCI) in dentate individuals measured by the different methods with mechanical articulator (MA), virtual articulator (VA), and a jaw tracking device (JTD) system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 22 healthy dentate participants were enrolled in this study. For MA workflow, the SCI was obtained by a semi-adjustable articulator with protrusive interocclusal records. The SCI was also set on a VA by aligning intraoral scan (IOS) with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and facial scan (FS), respectively. These virtual workflows were conducted in a dental design software, namely VA<sub>IOS-CBCT</sub> and VA<sub>IOS-FS</sub>. Meanwhile, a JTD system was also utilized to perform the measurement. Intraclass correlation was used to assess the repeatability within workflows. The bilateral SCI values were compared by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test for each workflow, and Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc p-value Bonferroni correction were used to compare the differences among four workflows. The agreement of VA<sub>IOS-CBCT</sub>, VA<sub>IOS-FS</sub>, and JTD compared with MA was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraclass correlation of the SCI revealed a high degree of repeatability for each workflow. There were no significant differences between the left and right sides (<i>P</i> > .05), except for VA<sub>IOS-CBCT</sub> (<i>P</i> = .028). Significant differences were not found between MA and VA<sub>IOS-FS</sub> (<i>P</i> > .05). Bland-Altman plots indicated VA<sub>IOS-CBCT</sub>, VA<sub>IOS-FS</sub>, and JTD were considered to substitute MA with high 95% limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The workflow of VA<sub>IOS-FS</sub> provided an alternative approach to measure the SCI compared with MA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/3d/jap-15-11.PMC9992698.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.1.11\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.1.11","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study to measure the sagittal condylar inclination using mechanical articulator, virtual articulator and jaw tracking device.
Purpose: To compare the sagittal condylar inclination (SCI) in dentate individuals measured by the different methods with mechanical articulator (MA), virtual articulator (VA), and a jaw tracking device (JTD) system.
Materials and methods: A total of 22 healthy dentate participants were enrolled in this study. For MA workflow, the SCI was obtained by a semi-adjustable articulator with protrusive interocclusal records. The SCI was also set on a VA by aligning intraoral scan (IOS) with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and facial scan (FS), respectively. These virtual workflows were conducted in a dental design software, namely VAIOS-CBCT and VAIOS-FS. Meanwhile, a JTD system was also utilized to perform the measurement. Intraclass correlation was used to assess the repeatability within workflows. The bilateral SCI values were compared by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test for each workflow, and Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc p-value Bonferroni correction were used to compare the differences among four workflows. The agreement of VAIOS-CBCT, VAIOS-FS, and JTD compared with MA was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: Intraclass correlation of the SCI revealed a high degree of repeatability for each workflow. There were no significant differences between the left and right sides (P > .05), except for VAIOS-CBCT (P = .028). Significant differences were not found between MA and VAIOS-FS (P > .05). Bland-Altman plots indicated VAIOS-CBCT, VAIOS-FS, and JTD were considered to substitute MA with high 95% limits of agreement.
Conclusion: The workflow of VAIOS-FS provided an alternative approach to measure the SCI compared with MA.
期刊介绍：
This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics.
This journal publishes
• Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants.
• Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics.
• Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
