75岁以上韩国患者诊断为前列腺癌症后1年内的治疗模式:一项回顾性多中心研究

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Prostate International Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prnil.2022.08.003
Dong Jin Park , Ho Won Kang , Se Yun Kwon , Young Jin Seo , Kyung Seop Lee , Byung Hoon Kim , Teak Jun Shin , Won Tae Kim , Yong-June Kim , Seok Joong Yun , Sang-Cheol Lee , Jae-Wook Chung , Seock Hwan Choi , Jun Nyung Lee , Hyun Tae Kim , Tae-Hwan Kim , Eun Sang Yoo , Tae Gyun Kwon , Wonho Jung , Yun-Sok Ha
{"title":"75岁以上韩国患者诊断为前列腺癌症后1年内的治疗模式:一项回顾性多中心研究","authors":"Dong Jin Park ,&nbsp;Ho Won Kang ,&nbsp;Se Yun Kwon ,&nbsp;Young Jin Seo ,&nbsp;Kyung Seop Lee ,&nbsp;Byung Hoon Kim ,&nbsp;Teak Jun Shin ,&nbsp;Won Tae Kim ,&nbsp;Yong-June Kim ,&nbsp;Seok Joong Yun ,&nbsp;Sang-Cheol Lee ,&nbsp;Jae-Wook Chung ,&nbsp;Seock Hwan Choi ,&nbsp;Jun Nyung Lee ,&nbsp;Hyun Tae Kim ,&nbsp;Tae-Hwan Kim ,&nbsp;Eun Sang Yoo ,&nbsp;Tae Gyun Kwon ,&nbsp;Wonho Jung ,&nbsp;Yun-Sok Ha","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate the current status of first-line treatment options for prostate cancer in patients aged ≥75 years in Korea.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study included 873 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven prostate cancer at 5 institutions in Korea from January 2009 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria were aged ≥75 years at diagnosis, prostate biopsy with ≥12 cores, and follow-up period ≥1 year. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Primary treatment for prostate cancer in patients aged ≥75 years included androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (n = 614), radical prostatectomy (RP) (n = 114), and radiation therapy (n = 62). Among patients with RP, nine patients received ADT before RP. The RP group was younger with better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), lower initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score (GS), max percent positive cores, less positive cores, and less advanced clinical Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage compared with the ADT group. Multivariate analysis showed that age, ECOG PS, and PSA were independent prognostic factors for RP. When the ADT group was classified by therapeutic regimens, the most common therapeutic regimen was maximal androgen blockade (MAB) (n = 571), and leuprolide + bicalutamide (n = 330) was the most common MAB regimen. Multivariate analysis for secondary treatment showed that age, ECOG PS, GS, and clinical N1 or M1 stage were independent predictive factors. Enzalutamide was the most preferred treatment for tertiary treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients with prostate cancer aged ≥75 years, the most common treatment option was MAB, and the leuprolide + bicalutamide was the most common MAB regimen. Age, ECOG PS, and PSA are the useful indicators of surgical treatment, which increased during the study period. Younger patients with high GS and advanced clinical stage were more likely to undergo secondary treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9995689/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current treatment patterns within 1 year after prostate cancer diagnosis in Korean patients over 75 years old: a retrospective multicenter study\",\"authors\":\"Dong Jin Park ,&nbsp;Ho Won Kang ,&nbsp;Se Yun Kwon ,&nbsp;Young Jin Seo ,&nbsp;Kyung Seop Lee ,&nbsp;Byung Hoon Kim ,&nbsp;Teak Jun Shin ,&nbsp;Won Tae Kim ,&nbsp;Yong-June Kim ,&nbsp;Seok Joong Yun ,&nbsp;Sang-Cheol Lee ,&nbsp;Jae-Wook Chung ,&nbsp;Seock Hwan Choi ,&nbsp;Jun Nyung Lee ,&nbsp;Hyun Tae Kim ,&nbsp;Tae-Hwan Kim ,&nbsp;Eun Sang Yoo ,&nbsp;Tae Gyun Kwon ,&nbsp;Wonho Jung ,&nbsp;Yun-Sok Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate the current status of first-line treatment options for prostate cancer in patients aged ≥75 years in Korea.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The study included 873 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven prostate cancer at 5 institutions in Korea from January 2009 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria were aged ≥75 years at diagnosis, prostate biopsy with ≥12 cores, and follow-up period ≥1 year. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Primary treatment for prostate cancer in patients aged ≥75 years included androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (n = 614), radical prostatectomy (RP) (n = 114), and radiation therapy (n = 62). Among patients with RP, nine patients received ADT before RP. The RP group was younger with better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), lower initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score (GS), max percent positive cores, less positive cores, and less advanced clinical Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage compared with the ADT group. Multivariate analysis showed that age, ECOG PS, and PSA were independent prognostic factors for RP. When the ADT group was classified by therapeutic regimens, the most common therapeutic regimen was maximal androgen blockade (MAB) (n = 571), and leuprolide + bicalutamide (n = 330) was the most common MAB regimen. Multivariate analysis for secondary treatment showed that age, ECOG PS, GS, and clinical N1 or M1 stage were independent predictive factors. Enzalutamide was the most preferred treatment for tertiary treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients with prostate cancer aged ≥75 years, the most common treatment option was MAB, and the leuprolide + bicalutamide was the most common MAB regimen. Age, ECOG PS, and PSA are the useful indicators of surgical treatment, which increased during the study period. Younger patients with high GS and advanced clinical stage were more likely to undergo secondary treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate International\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 34-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9995689/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000472\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景我们旨在评估韩国≥75岁患者前列腺癌症一线治疗方案的现状。材料和方法研究包括2009年1月至2018年12月在韩国5家机构诊断为生物合成前列腺癌症的873名患者。纳入标准为诊断时年龄≥75岁,前列腺活检≥12个核心,随访期≥1年。临床数据是从电子医疗记录中回顾性收集的。结果年龄≥75岁的癌症患者的主要治疗包括雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)(n=614)、前列腺癌根治术(RP)(n=114)和放射治疗(n=62)。在RP患者中,有9名患者在RP前接受了ADT。与ADT组相比,RP组更年轻,具有更好的东部肿瘤协作组表现状态(ECOG PS)、更低的初始前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、Gleason评分(GS)、最大阳性核心百分比、较低阳性核心和较低的晚期临床肿瘤结转移(TNM)分期。多因素分析显示,年龄、ECOG PS和PSA是RP的独立预后因素。当按治疗方案对ADT组进行分类时,最常见的治疗方案是最大雄激素阻断(MAB)(n=571),亮丙瑞林+比卡鲁胺(n=330)是最常见的MAB方案。二次治疗的多因素分析显示,年龄、ECOG PS、GS和临床N1或M1分期是独立的预测因素。Enzalutamide是三级治疗中最优选的治疗方法。结论年龄≥75岁的癌症患者,MAB是最常见的治疗方案,亮丙瑞林+比卡鲁胺为最常见的MAB方案。年龄、ECOG PS和PSA是手术治疗的有用指标,在研究期间有所增加。具有高GS和晚期临床阶段的年轻患者更有可能接受二次治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current treatment patterns within 1 year after prostate cancer diagnosis in Korean patients over 75 years old: a retrospective multicenter study

Background

We aimed to evaluate the current status of first-line treatment options for prostate cancer in patients aged ≥75 years in Korea.

Materials and methods

The study included 873 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven prostate cancer at 5 institutions in Korea from January 2009 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria were aged ≥75 years at diagnosis, prostate biopsy with ≥12 cores, and follow-up period ≥1 year. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records.

Results

Primary treatment for prostate cancer in patients aged ≥75 years included androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (n = 614), radical prostatectomy (RP) (n = 114), and radiation therapy (n = 62). Among patients with RP, nine patients received ADT before RP. The RP group was younger with better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), lower initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score (GS), max percent positive cores, less positive cores, and less advanced clinical Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage compared with the ADT group. Multivariate analysis showed that age, ECOG PS, and PSA were independent prognostic factors for RP. When the ADT group was classified by therapeutic regimens, the most common therapeutic regimen was maximal androgen blockade (MAB) (n = 571), and leuprolide + bicalutamide (n = 330) was the most common MAB regimen. Multivariate analysis for secondary treatment showed that age, ECOG PS, GS, and clinical N1 or M1 stage were independent predictive factors. Enzalutamide was the most preferred treatment for tertiary treatment.

Conclusion

In patients with prostate cancer aged ≥75 years, the most common treatment option was MAB, and the leuprolide + bicalutamide was the most common MAB regimen. Age, ECOG PS, and PSA are the useful indicators of surgical treatment, which increased during the study period. Younger patients with high GS and advanced clinical stage were more likely to undergo secondary treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Screening and validation of novel serum panel of microRNA in stratification of prostate cancer” [Prostate Int 11 (2023) 150–158] Current status and therapeutic value of extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Negative magnetic resonance imaging cannot be used to omit an initial prostate biopsy - An ambispective study Utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging The association between inflammatory bowel disease and risk of prostate cancer: a population-based retrospective study based on Korean National Health Insurance Service database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1