{"title":"COVID-19大流行中的公民语言景观、边界实践和符号学意识形态","authors":"P. Phyak, B. Sharma","doi":"10.1075/ll.21035.phy","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines how Linguistic Landscapes in the Covid-19 pandemic construct the borders of place and people. We\n build on ‘semiotic ideology’ (Keane, 2018) and ‘semiotopology’ (Peck, Stroud & Williams, 2018) to analyze the bordering practices in citizen Linguistic Landscapes\n during the pandemic in Nepal. Our analysis shows that citizens combine multiple semiotic resources, both linguistic and\n non-linguistic, to create physical boundaries to restrict the mobility of people during the pandemic. However, the findings show\n that such practices are ideological; they promote the othering of the tenants, returnees from abroad/outside the valley, and\n non-locals. We argue that keeping place and people at the centre of analysis provides a critical framework to widen the scope of\n Linguistic Landscapes as a broad visual and semiotic space that embodies the bordering practices and categorization of people and\n their impacts on emotions, identities, and sense of belonging.","PeriodicalId":53129,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizen Linguistic Landscape, bordering practices, and semiotic ideology in the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"P. Phyak, B. Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ll.21035.phy\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article examines how Linguistic Landscapes in the Covid-19 pandemic construct the borders of place and people. We\\n build on ‘semiotic ideology’ (Keane, 2018) and ‘semiotopology’ (Peck, Stroud & Williams, 2018) to analyze the bordering practices in citizen Linguistic Landscapes\\n during the pandemic in Nepal. Our analysis shows that citizens combine multiple semiotic resources, both linguistic and\\n non-linguistic, to create physical boundaries to restrict the mobility of people during the pandemic. However, the findings show\\n that such practices are ideological; they promote the othering of the tenants, returnees from abroad/outside the valley, and\\n non-locals. We argue that keeping place and people at the centre of analysis provides a critical framework to widen the scope of\\n Linguistic Landscapes as a broad visual and semiotic space that embodies the bordering practices and categorization of people and\\n their impacts on emotions, identities, and sense of belonging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21035.phy\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.21035.phy","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Citizen Linguistic Landscape, bordering practices, and semiotic ideology in the COVID-19 pandemic
This article examines how Linguistic Landscapes in the Covid-19 pandemic construct the borders of place and people. We
build on ‘semiotic ideology’ (Keane, 2018) and ‘semiotopology’ (Peck, Stroud & Williams, 2018) to analyze the bordering practices in citizen Linguistic Landscapes
during the pandemic in Nepal. Our analysis shows that citizens combine multiple semiotic resources, both linguistic and
non-linguistic, to create physical boundaries to restrict the mobility of people during the pandemic. However, the findings show
that such practices are ideological; they promote the othering of the tenants, returnees from abroad/outside the valley, and
non-locals. We argue that keeping place and people at the centre of analysis provides a critical framework to widen the scope of
Linguistic Landscapes as a broad visual and semiotic space that embodies the bordering practices and categorization of people and
their impacts on emotions, identities, and sense of belonging.