损伤筛查对精英高尔夫球手下背部疼痛的疗效。

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1843
Samantha-Lynn Quinn, Benita Olivier, Warrick McKinon
{"title":"损伤筛查对精英高尔夫球手下背部疼痛的疗效。","authors":"Samantha-Lynn Quinn,&nbsp;Benita Olivier,&nbsp;Warrick McKinon","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Injury prevention is a growing focus for golfers in general and for elite golfers in particular. Movement screening has been proposed as a possible cost-effective means of identifying underlying risk factors and is widely utilised by therapists, trainers and coaches.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our study aimed to establish whether results from movement screening were associated with subsequent lower back injury in elite golfers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our prospective longitudinal cohort study with one baseline time point included 41 injury-free young elite male golfers who underwent movement screening. After this, the golfers were monitored for 6 months for lower back pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen golfers developed lower back pain (41%). Screening tests that were able to differentiate golfers who developed and those who did not develop lower back pain, included: rotational stability test on the non-dominant side (<i>p</i> = 0.01, effect size = 0.27), rotational stability test on the dominant side (<i>p</i> = 0.03; effect size = 0.29) and plank score (<i>p</i> = 0.03; effect size = 0.24). There were no differences observed in any other screening tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Out of 30 screening tests, only three tests were able to identify golfers not at risk of developing lower back pain. All three of these tests had weak effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Movement screening was not effective in identifying elite golfers at risk of lower back pain in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of injury screening for lower back pain in elite golfers.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha-Lynn Quinn,&nbsp;Benita Olivier,&nbsp;Warrick McKinon\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Injury prevention is a growing focus for golfers in general and for elite golfers in particular. Movement screening has been proposed as a possible cost-effective means of identifying underlying risk factors and is widely utilised by therapists, trainers and coaches.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our study aimed to establish whether results from movement screening were associated with subsequent lower back injury in elite golfers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our prospective longitudinal cohort study with one baseline time point included 41 injury-free young elite male golfers who underwent movement screening. After this, the golfers were monitored for 6 months for lower back pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen golfers developed lower back pain (41%). Screening tests that were able to differentiate golfers who developed and those who did not develop lower back pain, included: rotational stability test on the non-dominant side (<i>p</i> = 0.01, effect size = 0.27), rotational stability test on the dominant side (<i>p</i> = 0.03; effect size = 0.29) and plank score (<i>p</i> = 0.03; effect size = 0.24). There were no differences observed in any other screening tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Out of 30 screening tests, only three tests were able to identify golfers not at risk of developing lower back pain. All three of these tests had weak effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Movement screening was not effective in identifying elite golfers at risk of lower back pain in our study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982516/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:伤害预防是高尔夫球手普遍关注的焦点,尤其是精英高尔夫球手。运动筛查被认为是一种可能具有成本效益的识别潜在危险因素的方法,被治疗师、训练员和教练员广泛使用。目的:我们的研究旨在确定运动筛查的结果是否与精英高尔夫球手随后的下背部损伤有关。方法:我们的前瞻性纵向队列研究有一个基线时间点,包括41名接受运动筛查的无损伤年轻精英男性高尔夫球手。在此之后,对这些高尔夫球手进行了为期6个月的腰痛监测。结果:17名高尔夫球手出现腰痛(41%)。筛选试验能够区分出现和未出现下背部疼痛的高尔夫球手,包括:非优势侧的旋转稳定性试验(p = 0.01,效应值= 0.27),优势侧的旋转稳定性试验(p = 0.03;效应量= 0.29)和平板评分(p = 0.03;效应值= 0.24)。在任何其他筛选试验中均未观察到差异。结论:在30项筛选测试中,只有3项测试能够识别出没有腰痛风险的高尔夫球手。这三个测试的效应值都很弱。临床意义:在我们的研究中,运动筛查不能有效识别有腰痛风险的优秀高尔夫球手。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of injury screening for lower back pain in elite golfers.

Background: Injury prevention is a growing focus for golfers in general and for elite golfers in particular. Movement screening has been proposed as a possible cost-effective means of identifying underlying risk factors and is widely utilised by therapists, trainers and coaches.

Objectives: Our study aimed to establish whether results from movement screening were associated with subsequent lower back injury in elite golfers.

Methods: Our prospective longitudinal cohort study with one baseline time point included 41 injury-free young elite male golfers who underwent movement screening. After this, the golfers were monitored for 6 months for lower back pain.

Results: Seventeen golfers developed lower back pain (41%). Screening tests that were able to differentiate golfers who developed and those who did not develop lower back pain, included: rotational stability test on the non-dominant side (p = 0.01, effect size = 0.27), rotational stability test on the dominant side (p = 0.03; effect size = 0.29) and plank score (p = 0.03; effect size = 0.24). There were no differences observed in any other screening tests.

Conclusion: Out of 30 screening tests, only three tests were able to identify golfers not at risk of developing lower back pain. All three of these tests had weak effect sizes.

Clinical implications: Movement screening was not effective in identifying elite golfers at risk of lower back pain in our study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preventing deformities in paediatric cerebral palsy in poorly-resourced areas: A scoping review. Contextual factors experienced by mothers of children with special needs. Neurological examination of healthy term infants at ages 6 and 10 weeks in Tshwane District. Protracted exercise tolerance post-coronavirus disease 2019 in endurance athletes: A survey. Inspiratory muscle training in children with neuromuscular disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1