英国心血管介入学会关于院外心脏骤停的共识立场声明1:护理途径

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Interventional Cardiology Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.15420/icr.2022.09
Nilesh Pareek, Paul Rees, Tom Quinn, Johannes Von Vopelius-Feldt, Sean Gallagher, Abdul Mozid, Tom Johnson, Ellie Gudde, Rupert Simpson, Guy Glover, John Davies, Nick Curzen, Thomas R Keeble
{"title":"英国心血管介入学会关于院外心脏骤停的共识立场声明1:护理途径","authors":"Nilesh Pareek,&nbsp;Paul Rees,&nbsp;Tom Quinn,&nbsp;Johannes Von Vopelius-Feldt,&nbsp;Sean Gallagher,&nbsp;Abdul Mozid,&nbsp;Tom Johnson,&nbsp;Ellie Gudde,&nbsp;Rupert Simpson,&nbsp;Guy Glover,&nbsp;John Davies,&nbsp;Nick Curzen,&nbsp;Thomas R Keeble","doi":"10.15420/icr.2022.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) affects 80,000 patients per year in the UK; despite improvements in care, survival to discharge remains lower than 10%. NHS England and several societies recommend all resuscitated OHCA patients be directly transferred to a cardiac arrest centre (CAC). However, evidence is limited that all patients benefit from transfer to a CAC, and there are significant organisational, logistic and financial implications associated with such change in policies. Furthermore, there is significant variability in interventional cardiovascular practices for OHCA. Accordingly, the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society established a multidisciplinary group to address variability in practice and provide recommendations for the development of cardiac networks. In this position statement, we recommend: the formal establishment of dedicated CACs; a pathway of conveyance to CACs; and interventional practice to standardise our approach. Further research is needed to understand the role of CACs and which interventions benefit patients with OHCA to support wide-scale changes in networks of care across the UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"17 ","pages":"e18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/9a/icr-17-e18.PMC9820135.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"British Cardiovascular Interventional Society Consensus Position Statement on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest 1: Pathway of Care.\",\"authors\":\"Nilesh Pareek,&nbsp;Paul Rees,&nbsp;Tom Quinn,&nbsp;Johannes Von Vopelius-Feldt,&nbsp;Sean Gallagher,&nbsp;Abdul Mozid,&nbsp;Tom Johnson,&nbsp;Ellie Gudde,&nbsp;Rupert Simpson,&nbsp;Guy Glover,&nbsp;John Davies,&nbsp;Nick Curzen,&nbsp;Thomas R Keeble\",\"doi\":\"10.15420/icr.2022.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) affects 80,000 patients per year in the UK; despite improvements in care, survival to discharge remains lower than 10%. NHS England and several societies recommend all resuscitated OHCA patients be directly transferred to a cardiac arrest centre (CAC). However, evidence is limited that all patients benefit from transfer to a CAC, and there are significant organisational, logistic and financial implications associated with such change in policies. Furthermore, there is significant variability in interventional cardiovascular practices for OHCA. Accordingly, the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society established a multidisciplinary group to address variability in practice and provide recommendations for the development of cardiac networks. In this position statement, we recommend: the formal establishment of dedicated CACs; a pathway of conveyance to CACs; and interventional practice to standardise our approach. Further research is needed to understand the role of CACs and which interventions benefit patients with OHCA to support wide-scale changes in networks of care across the UK.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Cardiology Review\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"e18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/9a/icr-17-e18.PMC9820135.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Cardiology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2022.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2022.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在英国,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)每年影响80,000名患者;尽管护理有所改善,但到出院的存活率仍低于10%。NHS英格兰和几个协会建议所有复苏的OHCA患者直接转移到心脏骤停中心(CAC)。然而,证据有限,所有患者都受益于转移到CAC,并有重大的组织,后勤和财政影响相关的政策变化。此外,OHCA的介入心血管实践存在显著差异。因此,英国心血管介入学会成立了一个多学科小组来解决实践中的变异性,并为心脏网络的发展提供建议。在这一立场声明中,我们建议:正式设立专门的廉政公署;通往cac的运输通道;干预实践使我们的方法标准化。需要进一步的研究来了解cac的作用,以及哪些干预措施有利于OHCA患者,以支持整个英国护理网络的大规模变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
British Cardiovascular Interventional Society Consensus Position Statement on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest 1: Pathway of Care.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) affects 80,000 patients per year in the UK; despite improvements in care, survival to discharge remains lower than 10%. NHS England and several societies recommend all resuscitated OHCA patients be directly transferred to a cardiac arrest centre (CAC). However, evidence is limited that all patients benefit from transfer to a CAC, and there are significant organisational, logistic and financial implications associated with such change in policies. Furthermore, there is significant variability in interventional cardiovascular practices for OHCA. Accordingly, the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society established a multidisciplinary group to address variability in practice and provide recommendations for the development of cardiac networks. In this position statement, we recommend: the formal establishment of dedicated CACs; a pathway of conveyance to CACs; and interventional practice to standardise our approach. Further research is needed to understand the role of CACs and which interventions benefit patients with OHCA to support wide-scale changes in networks of care across the UK.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Cardiology Review
Interventional Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wire Escalation And De-escalation Techniques in Antegrade and Retrograde Approaches to Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Training Culture Focus Group Position Statement: Bringing Trainees and Trainers Together. Atherectomy Techniques: Rotablation, Orbital and Laser. Outcomes and Complications of Mitral and Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-edge Repair. New-generation Leadless Pacemaker Implantation: First Procedures in Central Asia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1