目前的大尺度结构数据并未排除早期暗能量

Tristan L. Smith, V. Poulin, J. Bernal, K. Boddy, M. Kamionkowski, R. Murgia
{"title":"目前的大尺度结构数据并未排除早期暗能量","authors":"Tristan L. Smith, V. Poulin, J. Bernal, K. Boddy, M. Kamionkowski, R. Murgia","doi":"10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We revisit the impact of early dark energy (EDE) on galaxy clustering using BOSS galaxy power spectra, analyzed using the effective field theory (EFT) of large-scale structure (LSS), and anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from Planck. Recent studies found that these data place stringent constraints on the maximum abundance of EDE allowed in the Universe. We argue here that their conclusions are a consequence of their choice of priors on the EDE parameter space, rather than any disagreement between the data and the model. For example, when considering EFT-LSS, CMB, and high-redshift supernovae data we find the EDE and $\\Lambda$CDM models can provide statistically indistinguishable fits ($\\Delta \\chi^2 = 0.12$) with a relatively large value for the maximum fraction of energy density in the EDE ($f_{\\rm ede} = 0.09$) and Hubble constant ($H_0 = 71$ km/s/Mpc) in the EDE model. Moreover, we demonstrate that the constraining power added from the inclusion of EFT-LSS traces to the potential tension between the power-spectrum amplitudes $A_s$ derived from BOSS and from Planck that arises even within the context of $\\Lambda$CDM. Until this is better understood, caution should be used when interpreting EFT-BOSS+Planck constraints to models beyond $\\Lambda$CDM. These findings suggest that EDE still provides a potential resolution to the Hubble tension and that it is worthwhile to test the predictions of EDE with future data-sets and further study its theoretical possibilities.","PeriodicalId":8431,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"73","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early dark energy is not excluded by current large-scale structure data\",\"authors\":\"Tristan L. Smith, V. Poulin, J. Bernal, K. Boddy, M. Kamionkowski, R. Murgia\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We revisit the impact of early dark energy (EDE) on galaxy clustering using BOSS galaxy power spectra, analyzed using the effective field theory (EFT) of large-scale structure (LSS), and anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from Planck. Recent studies found that these data place stringent constraints on the maximum abundance of EDE allowed in the Universe. We argue here that their conclusions are a consequence of their choice of priors on the EDE parameter space, rather than any disagreement between the data and the model. For example, when considering EFT-LSS, CMB, and high-redshift supernovae data we find the EDE and $\\\\Lambda$CDM models can provide statistically indistinguishable fits ($\\\\Delta \\\\chi^2 = 0.12$) with a relatively large value for the maximum fraction of energy density in the EDE ($f_{\\\\rm ede} = 0.09$) and Hubble constant ($H_0 = 71$ km/s/Mpc) in the EDE model. Moreover, we demonstrate that the constraining power added from the inclusion of EFT-LSS traces to the potential tension between the power-spectrum amplitudes $A_s$ derived from BOSS and from Planck that arises even within the context of $\\\\Lambda$CDM. Until this is better understood, caution should be used when interpreting EFT-BOSS+Planck constraints to models beyond $\\\\Lambda$CDM. These findings suggest that EDE still provides a potential resolution to the Hubble tension and that it is worthwhile to test the predictions of EDE with future data-sets and further study its theoretical possibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"73\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73

摘要

我们利用大尺度结构(LSS)的有效场论(EFT)和普朗克宇宙微波背景(CMB)的各向异性分析BOSS星系功率谱,重新审视了早期暗能量(EDE)对星系聚集的影响。最近的研究发现,这些数据对宇宙中允许的EDE的最大丰度施加了严格的限制。我们在这里认为,他们的结论是他们在EDE参数空间上选择先验的结果,而不是数据和模型之间的任何分歧。例如,当考虑EFT-LSS, CMB和高红移超新星数据时,我们发现EDE和$\Lambda$ CDM模型可以提供统计上难以区分的拟合($\Delta \chi^2 = 0.12$), EDE模型中最大能量密度分数($f_{\rm ede} = 0.09$)和哈勃常数($H_0 = 71$ km/s/Mpc)的值相对较大。此外,我们证明了包含EFT-LSS所增加的约束功率可以追溯到来自BOSS和来自普朗克的功率谱振幅$A_s$之间的潜在张力,即使在$\Lambda$ CDM的背景下也会出现这种张力。在这一点得到更好的理解之前,在将EFT-BOSS+普朗克约束解释到$\Lambda$ CDM之外的模型时应谨慎使用。这些发现表明,EDE仍然为哈勃张力提供了一个潜在的解决方案,并且值得用未来的数据集测试EDE的预测,并进一步研究其理论可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early dark energy is not excluded by current large-scale structure data
We revisit the impact of early dark energy (EDE) on galaxy clustering using BOSS galaxy power spectra, analyzed using the effective field theory (EFT) of large-scale structure (LSS), and anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from Planck. Recent studies found that these data place stringent constraints on the maximum abundance of EDE allowed in the Universe. We argue here that their conclusions are a consequence of their choice of priors on the EDE parameter space, rather than any disagreement between the data and the model. For example, when considering EFT-LSS, CMB, and high-redshift supernovae data we find the EDE and $\Lambda$CDM models can provide statistically indistinguishable fits ($\Delta \chi^2 = 0.12$) with a relatively large value for the maximum fraction of energy density in the EDE ($f_{\rm ede} = 0.09$) and Hubble constant ($H_0 = 71$ km/s/Mpc) in the EDE model. Moreover, we demonstrate that the constraining power added from the inclusion of EFT-LSS traces to the potential tension between the power-spectrum amplitudes $A_s$ derived from BOSS and from Planck that arises even within the context of $\Lambda$CDM. Until this is better understood, caution should be used when interpreting EFT-BOSS+Planck constraints to models beyond $\Lambda$CDM. These findings suggest that EDE still provides a potential resolution to the Hubble tension and that it is worthwhile to test the predictions of EDE with future data-sets and further study its theoretical possibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primordial Black Holes: from Theory to Gravitational Wave Observations Chasing the Tail of Cosmic Reionization with Dark Gap Statistics in the Ly$α$ Forest over $5 < z < 6$ Hubble tension and absolute constraints on the local Hubble parameter. Towards an Optimal Estimation of Cosmological Parameters with the Wavelet Scattering Transform Assessment of the cosmic distance duality relation using Gaussian process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1