术后经验性抗生素在无并发症肛周脓肿及瘘管中的应用

R. Hasan
{"title":"术后经验性抗生素在无并发症肛周脓肿及瘘管中的应用","authors":"R. Hasan","doi":"10.5812/ACR.40795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Perianal abscesses remain one of the most frequent surgical cases encountered by both general and colorectal surgeons. The use of broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics for perianal abscesses after drainage also remains common, although with questionable benefit. Objectives: The aim of the study conducted was to evaluate the role and efficacy of intraand post-operative empirical antibiotic combination with a wide antibacterial spectrum for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Methods: An observational longitudinal study consisted of 150 patients; 50% of them underwent incision and drainage of their perianal abscess. The rest had fistula-in-ano and were treated with fistulotomy. Patients were prescribed a course of empiric antibiotics at the time of diagnosis. The prescribed antibiotic consisted of two regimes. The mechanism of the first regime was based on inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis, whereas the second regime included antibiotics inhibiting protein synthesis of the bacteria. Afterwards, analysis of the effect of postoperative use of empiric antibiotics was performed regarding symptom assessment, recurrence rate of abscess, fistula formation, cellulitis, bacteremia and sepsis. Results: Among 150 patients included in the study, 92% were male and 8% were female. The age range was 20 to 66 years (mean 39.97 ± 0.16 years). Seventy-five of them had perianal abscess and the rest had fistula-in-ano. They were prescribed a course of empiric antibiotics. Patients who had perianal abscess showed an abscess recurrence rate of 10% and 5% after six and twelve months respectively. Perianal fistula formation occurred at the rate of 25% and 5% after six and twelve months respectively when Lincomycin treatment was used. Patients with perianal fistula treated with both fistulotomy and Lincomycin were followed up for six and twelve months. Follow-up showed an 11.42% rate of abscess formation after six months, however no recurrence of fistula was found. Conclusions: The results of this study concluded that antibiotics administered after incision and drainage had reduced the rate of fistula formation, abscess recurrence, cellulitis and sepsis. Our limited patient sampling does not provide a definite conclusion, although it is clear that fistula formation is of clinical importance in the role of empiric antibiotics in preventing recurrence and merits further study.","PeriodicalId":8370,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Colorectal Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula\",\"authors\":\"R. Hasan\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ACR.40795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Perianal abscesses remain one of the most frequent surgical cases encountered by both general and colorectal surgeons. The use of broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics for perianal abscesses after drainage also remains common, although with questionable benefit. Objectives: The aim of the study conducted was to evaluate the role and efficacy of intraand post-operative empirical antibiotic combination with a wide antibacterial spectrum for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Methods: An observational longitudinal study consisted of 150 patients; 50% of them underwent incision and drainage of their perianal abscess. The rest had fistula-in-ano and were treated with fistulotomy. Patients were prescribed a course of empiric antibiotics at the time of diagnosis. The prescribed antibiotic consisted of two regimes. The mechanism of the first regime was based on inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis, whereas the second regime included antibiotics inhibiting protein synthesis of the bacteria. Afterwards, analysis of the effect of postoperative use of empiric antibiotics was performed regarding symptom assessment, recurrence rate of abscess, fistula formation, cellulitis, bacteremia and sepsis. Results: Among 150 patients included in the study, 92% were male and 8% were female. The age range was 20 to 66 years (mean 39.97 ± 0.16 years). Seventy-five of them had perianal abscess and the rest had fistula-in-ano. They were prescribed a course of empiric antibiotics. Patients who had perianal abscess showed an abscess recurrence rate of 10% and 5% after six and twelve months respectively. Perianal fistula formation occurred at the rate of 25% and 5% after six and twelve months respectively when Lincomycin treatment was used. Patients with perianal fistula treated with both fistulotomy and Lincomycin were followed up for six and twelve months. Follow-up showed an 11.42% rate of abscess formation after six months, however no recurrence of fistula was found. Conclusions: The results of this study concluded that antibiotics administered after incision and drainage had reduced the rate of fistula formation, abscess recurrence, cellulitis and sepsis. Our limited patient sampling does not provide a definite conclusion, although it is clear that fistula formation is of clinical importance in the role of empiric antibiotics in preventing recurrence and merits further study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Colorectal Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Colorectal Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ACR.40795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Colorectal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ACR.40795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:肛周脓肿仍然是普通外科医生和结直肠外科医生最常见的手术病例之一。使用广谱经验性抗生素治疗引流后肛周脓肿也很常见,尽管其益处值得商榷。目的:本研究旨在评价术中及术后应用抗菌谱广的经验性抗生素联合治疗肛周脓肿及肛瘘的作用及疗效。方法:对150例患者进行观察性纵向研究;50%患者行肛周脓肿切开引流术。其余患者均有瘘管并行瘘管切开术治疗。在诊断时,给患者开一个疗程的经验性抗生素。处方抗生素包括两种疗法。第一种方案的机制是基于抑制细菌细胞壁的合成,而第二种方案包括抗生素抑制细菌的蛋白质合成。从症状评估、脓肿复发率、瘘管形成、蜂窝织炎、菌血症、脓毒症等方面分析术后应用经验性抗生素的效果。结果:纳入研究的150例患者中,男性占92%,女性占8%。年龄20 ~ 66岁,平均39.97±0.16岁。其中75例为肛周脓肿,其余为肛瘘。医生给他们开了一个疗程的经验性抗生素。肛周脓肿患者术后6个月复发率为10%,12个月复发率为5%。使用林可霉素治疗后6个月和12个月肛周瘘发生率分别为25%和5%。术后随访6个月和12个月。随访6个月后脓肿形成率为11.42%,无瘘管复发。结论:本研究结果表明,切开引流后给予抗生素可降低瘘管形成、脓肿复发、蜂窝织炎和脓毒症的发生率。我们有限的患者样本并没有提供明确的结论,尽管很明显,瘘管形成在经验性抗生素预防复发的临床作用中具有重要意义,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula
Background: Perianal abscesses remain one of the most frequent surgical cases encountered by both general and colorectal surgeons. The use of broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics for perianal abscesses after drainage also remains common, although with questionable benefit. Objectives: The aim of the study conducted was to evaluate the role and efficacy of intraand post-operative empirical antibiotic combination with a wide antibacterial spectrum for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Methods: An observational longitudinal study consisted of 150 patients; 50% of them underwent incision and drainage of their perianal abscess. The rest had fistula-in-ano and were treated with fistulotomy. Patients were prescribed a course of empiric antibiotics at the time of diagnosis. The prescribed antibiotic consisted of two regimes. The mechanism of the first regime was based on inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis, whereas the second regime included antibiotics inhibiting protein synthesis of the bacteria. Afterwards, analysis of the effect of postoperative use of empiric antibiotics was performed regarding symptom assessment, recurrence rate of abscess, fistula formation, cellulitis, bacteremia and sepsis. Results: Among 150 patients included in the study, 92% were male and 8% were female. The age range was 20 to 66 years (mean 39.97 ± 0.16 years). Seventy-five of them had perianal abscess and the rest had fistula-in-ano. They were prescribed a course of empiric antibiotics. Patients who had perianal abscess showed an abscess recurrence rate of 10% and 5% after six and twelve months respectively. Perianal fistula formation occurred at the rate of 25% and 5% after six and twelve months respectively when Lincomycin treatment was used. Patients with perianal fistula treated with both fistulotomy and Lincomycin were followed up for six and twelve months. Follow-up showed an 11.42% rate of abscess formation after six months, however no recurrence of fistula was found. Conclusions: The results of this study concluded that antibiotics administered after incision and drainage had reduced the rate of fistula formation, abscess recurrence, cellulitis and sepsis. Our limited patient sampling does not provide a definite conclusion, although it is clear that fistula formation is of clinical importance in the role of empiric antibiotics in preventing recurrence and merits further study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of endoplasmic reticulum metallo protease 1 on Autophagy Pathway in HCT-116 Colorectal Cancer Cell Line ORAL BACTERIA AND COLORECTAL PATHOLOGY Technique of Ghost (Khatith) Ileostomy-How I Do It? Collagenous Enteritis – An Alternative Cause of Malabsorptive Enteropathy SIMPLE ANAL FISTULA: CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS AND LOCAL ANESTHESIA WITH CONSCIOUS SEDATION FOR SURGERY - AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1