Phil Y Yao, Susanna J Shaw, Rodney A Gabriel, Claire S Soria
{"title":"尾部镇痛能否改善小儿烧伤手术的疼痛控制:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Phil Y Yao, Susanna J Shaw, Rodney A Gabriel, Claire S Soria","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric burns affect approximately 15-20 patients per 100 000 hospital admissions, but unfortunately there is a lack of evidence to guide optimal strategies for acute pain control. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether caudal analgesia with single injection of local anesthetics reduced pain medication consumption in pediatric patients who required surgical intervention for burn injuries. Retrospective data from patients <7 years old who had burn surgery in the operating rooms at a single regional burn center from 2013 to 2021 was obtained and analyzed. A 1:1 propensity-score matching method using nearest neighbor matching without replacement was utilized to create matched cohorts. Primary outcome was opioid consumption, which is presented as opioid equivalents divided by patient weight in kilograms, at 24 h after surgery. Comparing propensity-score matched groups, there were no statistically significant differences in adjusted morphine equivalents received by the caudal group (0.122 [0.0646;0.186]) and the no caudal group (0.0783 [0.0384;0.153]) at 24 h after surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.06). This is the first study to the best of our knowledge of the association of caudal analgesia in pediatric burn patients with postoperative pain control. The data showed an increase in pain medication consumption postoperative at 24 h and intraoperative for patients who received single injection caudal blocks, but when adjusted using propensity-score matching, the difference was no longer statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":19634,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain","volume":"5 1","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/8f/PNE2-5-10.PMC9997120.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does caudal analgesia improve pain control for pediatric burn surgery: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Phil Y Yao, Susanna J Shaw, Rodney A Gabriel, Claire S Soria\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pne2.12091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pediatric burns affect approximately 15-20 patients per 100 000 hospital admissions, but unfortunately there is a lack of evidence to guide optimal strategies for acute pain control. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether caudal analgesia with single injection of local anesthetics reduced pain medication consumption in pediatric patients who required surgical intervention for burn injuries. Retrospective data from patients <7 years old who had burn surgery in the operating rooms at a single regional burn center from 2013 to 2021 was obtained and analyzed. A 1:1 propensity-score matching method using nearest neighbor matching without replacement was utilized to create matched cohorts. Primary outcome was opioid consumption, which is presented as opioid equivalents divided by patient weight in kilograms, at 24 h after surgery. Comparing propensity-score matched groups, there were no statistically significant differences in adjusted morphine equivalents received by the caudal group (0.122 [0.0646;0.186]) and the no caudal group (0.0783 [0.0384;0.153]) at 24 h after surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.06). This is the first study to the best of our knowledge of the association of caudal analgesia in pediatric burn patients with postoperative pain control. The data showed an increase in pain medication consumption postoperative at 24 h and intraoperative for patients who received single injection caudal blocks, but when adjusted using propensity-score matching, the difference was no longer statistically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"10-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/8f/PNE2-5-10.PMC9997120.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric & Neonatal Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
每 10 万名住院患者中,约有 15-20 名小儿烧伤患者,但遗憾的是,目前缺乏证据来指导急性疼痛控制的最佳策略。本研究的目的是评估单次注射局麻药进行尾侧镇痛是否能减少因烧伤需要手术治疗的小儿患者的止痛药消耗。来自患者的回顾性数据 p = 0.06)。据我们所知,这是第一项关于小儿烧伤患者尾部镇痛与术后疼痛控制相关性的研究。数据显示,接受单次注射尾部阻滞的患者术后 24 小时和术中的镇痛药物消耗量有所增加,但在使用倾向分数匹配法进行调整后,差异不再具有统计学意义。
Does caudal analgesia improve pain control for pediatric burn surgery: A retrospective study.
Pediatric burns affect approximately 15-20 patients per 100 000 hospital admissions, but unfortunately there is a lack of evidence to guide optimal strategies for acute pain control. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether caudal analgesia with single injection of local anesthetics reduced pain medication consumption in pediatric patients who required surgical intervention for burn injuries. Retrospective data from patients <7 years old who had burn surgery in the operating rooms at a single regional burn center from 2013 to 2021 was obtained and analyzed. A 1:1 propensity-score matching method using nearest neighbor matching without replacement was utilized to create matched cohorts. Primary outcome was opioid consumption, which is presented as opioid equivalents divided by patient weight in kilograms, at 24 h after surgery. Comparing propensity-score matched groups, there were no statistically significant differences in adjusted morphine equivalents received by the caudal group (0.122 [0.0646;0.186]) and the no caudal group (0.0783 [0.0384;0.153]) at 24 h after surgery (p = 0.06). This is the first study to the best of our knowledge of the association of caudal analgesia in pediatric burn patients with postoperative pain control. The data showed an increase in pain medication consumption postoperative at 24 h and intraoperative for patients who received single injection caudal blocks, but when adjusted using propensity-score matching, the difference was no longer statistically significant.