基于清单的加权模糊严重程度法计算巴塞尔协议II下外汇交易操作风险

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Operational Risk Pub Date : 2014-12-19 DOI:10.21314/jop.2014.136
V. Sree Hari Rao, K. Ramesh
{"title":"基于清单的加权模糊严重程度法计算巴塞尔协议II下外汇交易操作风险","authors":"V. Sree Hari Rao, K. Ramesh","doi":"10.21314/jop.2014.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well-known that any risk management activity is a cost to the organization. However, optimized risk management practices satisfy regulatory capital requirements and gain the confidence of investors who take calculated risks. A bank’s risk management division will generate a profit if it can develop methodologies to decrease the nonworking regulatory capital. This may be achieved only when the risks are measured using data from internal and external sources in conjunction with scenario analysis. One such method of measuring operational risk (OR) is the advanced measurement approach. This involves quantifying ORs across the various nodes within a bank following the loss distribution approach, in which the frequency and severity distributions of the loss-generating OR events are estimated from the data sources. These distributions are then used to generate the scenarios for frequency and its associated severity for estimating the OR capital. In our approach, the various levels of loss severity are mapped to a percentage of total trade exposure, and the occurrence frequency of an OR event is assumed to follow a binomial distribution.","PeriodicalId":54030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operational Risk","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Checklist-Based Weighted Fuzzy Severity Approach for Calculating Operational Risk Exposure on Foreign Exchange Trades Under the Basel II Regime\",\"authors\":\"V. Sree Hari Rao, K. Ramesh\",\"doi\":\"10.21314/jop.2014.136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well-known that any risk management activity is a cost to the organization. However, optimized risk management practices satisfy regulatory capital requirements and gain the confidence of investors who take calculated risks. A bank’s risk management division will generate a profit if it can develop methodologies to decrease the nonworking regulatory capital. This may be achieved only when the risks are measured using data from internal and external sources in conjunction with scenario analysis. One such method of measuring operational risk (OR) is the advanced measurement approach. This involves quantifying ORs across the various nodes within a bank following the loss distribution approach, in which the frequency and severity distributions of the loss-generating OR events are estimated from the data sources. These distributions are then used to generate the scenarios for frequency and its associated severity for estimating the OR capital. In our approach, the various levels of loss severity are mapped to a percentage of total trade exposure, and the occurrence frequency of an OR event is assumed to follow a binomial distribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Operational Risk\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Operational Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21314/jop.2014.136\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operational Risk","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/jop.2014.136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

众所周知,任何风险管理活动都是组织的成本。然而,优化的风险管理实践满足了监管资本要求,并获得了承担可计算风险的投资者的信心。如果银行的风险管理部门能够开发出减少非营运监管资本的方法,它将产生利润。只有在使用来自内部和外部来源的数据并结合情景分析来衡量风险时,才能做到这一点。其中一种测量操作风险(OR)的方法是高级测量方法。这涉及根据损失分布方法对银行内各个节点的OR进行量化,其中从数据源估计产生损失的OR事件的频率和严重程度分布。然后使用这些分布来生成频率及其相关严重性的场景,以估计OR资本。在我们的方法中,不同级别的损失严重程度被映射为总交易风险的百分比,并且假设OR事件的发生频率遵循二项分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Checklist-Based Weighted Fuzzy Severity Approach for Calculating Operational Risk Exposure on Foreign Exchange Trades Under the Basel II Regime
It is well-known that any risk management activity is a cost to the organization. However, optimized risk management practices satisfy regulatory capital requirements and gain the confidence of investors who take calculated risks. A bank’s risk management division will generate a profit if it can develop methodologies to decrease the nonworking regulatory capital. This may be achieved only when the risks are measured using data from internal and external sources in conjunction with scenario analysis. One such method of measuring operational risk (OR) is the advanced measurement approach. This involves quantifying ORs across the various nodes within a bank following the loss distribution approach, in which the frequency and severity distributions of the loss-generating OR events are estimated from the data sources. These distributions are then used to generate the scenarios for frequency and its associated severity for estimating the OR capital. In our approach, the various levels of loss severity are mapped to a percentage of total trade exposure, and the occurrence frequency of an OR event is assumed to follow a binomial distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Operational Risk
Journal of Operational Risk BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
40.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: In December 2017, the Basel Committee published the final version of its standardized measurement approach (SMA) methodology, which will replace the approaches set out in Basel II (ie, the simpler standardized approaches and advanced measurement approach (AMA) that allowed use of internal models) from January 1, 2022. Independently of the Basel III rules, in order to manage and mitigate risks, they still need to be measurable by anyone. The operational risk industry needs to keep that in mind. While the purpose of the now defunct AMA was to find out the level of regulatory capital to protect a firm against operational risks, we still can – and should – use models to estimate operational risk economic capital. Without these, the task of managing and mitigating capital would be incredibly difficult. These internal models are now unshackled from regulatory requirements and can be optimized for managing the daily risks to which financial institutions are exposed. In addition, operational risk models can and should be used for stress tests and Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). The Journal of Operational Risk also welcomes papers on nonfinancial risks as well as topics including, but not limited to, the following. The modeling and management of operational risk. Recent advances in techniques used to model operational risk, eg, copulas, correlation, aggregate loss distributions, Bayesian methods and extreme value theory. The pricing and hedging of operational risk and/or any risk transfer techniques. Data modeling external loss data, business control factors and scenario analysis. Models used to aggregate different types of data. Causal models that link key risk indicators and macroeconomic factors to operational losses. Regulatory issues, such as Basel II or any other local regulatory issue. Enterprise risk management. Cyber risk. Big data.
期刊最新文献
A risk-based internal audit methodology for Greek local government organizations Integrating text mining and analytic hierarchy process risk assessment with knowledge graphs for operational risk analysis Operational risk and regulatory capital: do public and private banks differ? Cyber risk definition and classification for financial risk management Audit committee characteristics and the audit report lag in Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1