基于机器学习的页岩储层支撑裂缝导电性相关性研究进展

M. Desouky, Zeeshan Tariq, Murtada Al jawad, Hamed Alhoori, M. Mahmoud, A. Abdulraheem
{"title":"基于机器学习的页岩储层支撑裂缝导电性相关性研究进展","authors":"M. Desouky, Zeeshan Tariq, Murtada Al jawad, Hamed Alhoori, M. Mahmoud, A. Abdulraheem","doi":"10.2118/204606-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Propped hydraulic fracturing is a stimulation technique used in tight formations to create conductive fractures. To predict the fractured well productivity, the conductivity of those propped fractures should be estimated. It is common to measure the conductivity of propped fractures in the laboratory under controlled conditions. Nonetheless, it is costly and time-consuming which encouraged developing many empirical and analytical propped fracture conductivity models. Previous empirical models, however, were based on limited datasets producing questionable correlations. We propose herein new empirical models based on an extensive data set utilizing machine learning (ML) methods.\n In this study, an artificial neural network (ANN) was utilized. A dataset comprised of 351 data points of propped hydraulic fracture experiments on different shale types with different mineralogy under various confining stresses was collected and studied. Several statistical and data science approaches such as box and whisker plots, correlation crossplots, and Z-score techniques were used to remove the outliers and extreme data points. The performance of the developed model was evaluated using powerful metrics such as correlation coefficient and root mean squared error.\n After several executions and function evaluations, an ANN was found to be the best technique to predict propped fracture conductivity for different mineralogy. The proposed ANN models resulted in less than 7% error between actual and predicted values. In this study, in addition to the development of an optimized ANN model, explicit empirical correlations are also extracted from the weights and biases of the fine-tuned model. The proposed model of propped fracture conductivity was then compared with the commonly available correlations. The results revealed that the proposed mineralogy based propped fracture conductivity models made the predictions with a high correlation coefficient of 94%.\n This work clearly shows the potential of computer-based ML techniques in the determination of mineralogy based propped fracture conductivity. The proposed empirical correlation can be implemented without requiring any ML-based software.","PeriodicalId":11320,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Tue, November 30, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Machine Learning Based Propped Fracture Conductivity Correlations in Shale Formations\",\"authors\":\"M. Desouky, Zeeshan Tariq, Murtada Al jawad, Hamed Alhoori, M. Mahmoud, A. Abdulraheem\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/204606-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Propped hydraulic fracturing is a stimulation technique used in tight formations to create conductive fractures. To predict the fractured well productivity, the conductivity of those propped fractures should be estimated. It is common to measure the conductivity of propped fractures in the laboratory under controlled conditions. Nonetheless, it is costly and time-consuming which encouraged developing many empirical and analytical propped fracture conductivity models. Previous empirical models, however, were based on limited datasets producing questionable correlations. We propose herein new empirical models based on an extensive data set utilizing machine learning (ML) methods.\\n In this study, an artificial neural network (ANN) was utilized. A dataset comprised of 351 data points of propped hydraulic fracture experiments on different shale types with different mineralogy under various confining stresses was collected and studied. Several statistical and data science approaches such as box and whisker plots, correlation crossplots, and Z-score techniques were used to remove the outliers and extreme data points. The performance of the developed model was evaluated using powerful metrics such as correlation coefficient and root mean squared error.\\n After several executions and function evaluations, an ANN was found to be the best technique to predict propped fracture conductivity for different mineralogy. The proposed ANN models resulted in less than 7% error between actual and predicted values. In this study, in addition to the development of an optimized ANN model, explicit empirical correlations are also extracted from the weights and biases of the fine-tuned model. The proposed model of propped fracture conductivity was then compared with the commonly available correlations. The results revealed that the proposed mineralogy based propped fracture conductivity models made the predictions with a high correlation coefficient of 94%.\\n This work clearly shows the potential of computer-based ML techniques in the determination of mineralogy based propped fracture conductivity. The proposed empirical correlation can be implemented without requiring any ML-based software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Tue, November 30, 2021\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Tue, November 30, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/204606-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Tue, November 30, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204606-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

支撑式水力压裂是一种用于致密地层的增产技术,用于制造导流裂缝。为了预测压裂井的产能,需要对这些支撑裂缝的导流能力进行估算。在实验室受控条件下测量支撑裂缝的导电性是很常见的。然而,由于成本高且耗时长,因此开发了许多经验和分析性的支撑裂缝导流性模型。然而,以前的经验模型是基于有限的数据集,产生可疑的相关性。我们在此提出了新的经验模型基于广泛的数据集利用机器学习(ML)方法。在本研究中,采用了人工神经网络(ANN)。对不同矿物学条件下不同类型页岩在不同围应力条件下的支撑水力压裂实验数据集351个数点进行了采集和研究。使用了几种统计和数据科学方法,如盒状和晶须图、相关交叉图和z分数技术来去除异常值和极端数据点。使用相关系数和均方根误差等强大的指标对所开发模型的性能进行了评估。经过多次执行和功能评估,发现人工神经网络是预测不同矿物学支撑裂缝导流能力的最佳技术。所提出的人工神经网络模型在实际值和预测值之间的误差小于7%。在本研究中,除了开发优化的人工神经网络模型外,还从微调模型的权重和偏差中提取了显式的经验相关性。然后将所提出的支撑裂缝导流率模型与常用的相关性进行了比较。结果表明,基于矿物学的支撑裂缝导流率模型预测的相关系数高达94%。这项工作清楚地显示了基于计算机的ML技术在确定基于矿物学的支撑裂缝导电性方面的潜力。所提出的经验相关性可以在不需要任何基于ml的软件的情况下实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of Machine Learning Based Propped Fracture Conductivity Correlations in Shale Formations
Propped hydraulic fracturing is a stimulation technique used in tight formations to create conductive fractures. To predict the fractured well productivity, the conductivity of those propped fractures should be estimated. It is common to measure the conductivity of propped fractures in the laboratory under controlled conditions. Nonetheless, it is costly and time-consuming which encouraged developing many empirical and analytical propped fracture conductivity models. Previous empirical models, however, were based on limited datasets producing questionable correlations. We propose herein new empirical models based on an extensive data set utilizing machine learning (ML) methods. In this study, an artificial neural network (ANN) was utilized. A dataset comprised of 351 data points of propped hydraulic fracture experiments on different shale types with different mineralogy under various confining stresses was collected and studied. Several statistical and data science approaches such as box and whisker plots, correlation crossplots, and Z-score techniques were used to remove the outliers and extreme data points. The performance of the developed model was evaluated using powerful metrics such as correlation coefficient and root mean squared error. After several executions and function evaluations, an ANN was found to be the best technique to predict propped fracture conductivity for different mineralogy. The proposed ANN models resulted in less than 7% error between actual and predicted values. In this study, in addition to the development of an optimized ANN model, explicit empirical correlations are also extracted from the weights and biases of the fine-tuned model. The proposed model of propped fracture conductivity was then compared with the commonly available correlations. The results revealed that the proposed mineralogy based propped fracture conductivity models made the predictions with a high correlation coefficient of 94%. This work clearly shows the potential of computer-based ML techniques in the determination of mineralogy based propped fracture conductivity. The proposed empirical correlation can be implemented without requiring any ML-based software.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Large Scale Placement For Multilateral Wells Using Network Optimization How to Make Sensitive Formations Produce Oil: Case Study of the Complex Laboratory Approach to Stimulation Fluid Optimization Novel Analytical Solution and Type-Curves for Lost-Circulation Diagnostics of Drilling Mud in Fractured Formation A Novel Workflow for Geosteering a Horizontal Well in a Low Resistivity Contrast Anisotropic Environment: A Case Study in Semoga Field, Indonesia Uncertainty Quantification and Optimization of Deep Learning for Fracture Recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1