药物侵入治疗新冠肺炎时代急性STEMI患者

A. Islam, A. Reza, S. Talukder, S. Munwar, Atahar Ali, T. Ahmed, Kazi Atiqur Rahman, A. H. Bhuiyan, Aparajita Karim, P. Bala, Nighat Islam, Abeda Tasnim Reza, Tanbir Hossain, M. Z. Haque
{"title":"药物侵入治疗新冠肺炎时代急性STEMI患者","authors":"A. Islam, A. Reza, S. Talukder, S. Munwar, Atahar Ali, T. Ahmed, Kazi Atiqur Rahman, A. H. Bhuiyan, Aparajita Karim, P. Bala, Nighat Islam, Abeda Tasnim Reza, Tanbir Hossain, M. Z. Haque","doi":"10.3329/cardio.v15i2.65628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Treating acute ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients by primary PCI (pPCI) has dramatically fallen globally in covid era as there is chances of potential threat of spreading COVID among the non-COVID patients. Thereby, thrombolysis of acute STEMI patient in grey zone till COVID RT PCR report to come, was the mode of treatment of acute myocardial infarction patient in our hospital. We have carried out this prospective observational study to see the outcomes of thrombolysis and subsequent intervention.\nMethods: STEMI patient who presented to our emergency department with chest pain and ECG and hs-Troponin-I evidenced acute STEMI, were enrolled in the study. Total 139 patients enrolled (Male:120, Female :54); average age for Male: 54 yrs., female was: 56yrs. All patients were admitted in the grey zone of CCU where thrombolysis was done.  COVID-19 patients were excluded from intervention and managed conservatively. Covid Negative patients were kept transferred to CCU green zone. On average 2.1 days after Fibrinolysis, elective PCI carried out. Data analysis from 48 patients who underwent pharmacoinvasive therapy was done.\nResults: Among the study population, Covid-19 positive was in 11 (7.9%) patients and Covid-19 was negative in 128 (92.1%) patients. Primary PCI was performed in 7 (5.03%) patients. Rest of the patients were managed by Pharmacoinvasive therapy. Thrombolysis by Tenecteplase (TNK) was done in 89 (64%) patients, and by Streptokinase in 25 (17.9%) patients, 18 (12.9%) patients did not receive any thrombolysis due to late presentation. Chest pain to needle time was 7.2 ±12.7hrs., thrombolysis to balloon time was 117.5 ±314.8hrs. More than 50% stenosis resolution observed in 20 (41.6%) patients, chest pain resolution within one hour of thrombolysis observed in 21 (43.8%) patients. Ten (20.8%) patients developed. Door to needle time was 30 mins. Total, 88 stents were deployed in 83 territories. CABG was recommended for 7 (5.03%) patients. Stented territory was LAD 37 (45.7%) and RCA 32 (39.5%) and LCX 12 (14.8%).\nConclusion: In the era of COVID-19, in this prospective cohort study, on acute STEMI patient management, we found that Pharmacoinvasive therapy, reduced patients’ symptoms and ST resolution occurred partially.\nCardiovasc j 2023; 15(2): 136-143","PeriodicalId":9438,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacoinvasive Therapy in Treating Acute STEMI Patients in Covid-19 Era\",\"authors\":\"A. Islam, A. Reza, S. Talukder, S. Munwar, Atahar Ali, T. Ahmed, Kazi Atiqur Rahman, A. H. Bhuiyan, Aparajita Karim, P. Bala, Nighat Islam, Abeda Tasnim Reza, Tanbir Hossain, M. Z. Haque\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/cardio.v15i2.65628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Treating acute ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients by primary PCI (pPCI) has dramatically fallen globally in covid era as there is chances of potential threat of spreading COVID among the non-COVID patients. Thereby, thrombolysis of acute STEMI patient in grey zone till COVID RT PCR report to come, was the mode of treatment of acute myocardial infarction patient in our hospital. We have carried out this prospective observational study to see the outcomes of thrombolysis and subsequent intervention.\\nMethods: STEMI patient who presented to our emergency department with chest pain and ECG and hs-Troponin-I evidenced acute STEMI, were enrolled in the study. Total 139 patients enrolled (Male:120, Female :54); average age for Male: 54 yrs., female was: 56yrs. All patients were admitted in the grey zone of CCU where thrombolysis was done.  COVID-19 patients were excluded from intervention and managed conservatively. Covid Negative patients were kept transferred to CCU green zone. On average 2.1 days after Fibrinolysis, elective PCI carried out. Data analysis from 48 patients who underwent pharmacoinvasive therapy was done.\\nResults: Among the study population, Covid-19 positive was in 11 (7.9%) patients and Covid-19 was negative in 128 (92.1%) patients. Primary PCI was performed in 7 (5.03%) patients. Rest of the patients were managed by Pharmacoinvasive therapy. Thrombolysis by Tenecteplase (TNK) was done in 89 (64%) patients, and by Streptokinase in 25 (17.9%) patients, 18 (12.9%) patients did not receive any thrombolysis due to late presentation. Chest pain to needle time was 7.2 ±12.7hrs., thrombolysis to balloon time was 117.5 ±314.8hrs. More than 50% stenosis resolution observed in 20 (41.6%) patients, chest pain resolution within one hour of thrombolysis observed in 21 (43.8%) patients. Ten (20.8%) patients developed. Door to needle time was 30 mins. Total, 88 stents were deployed in 83 territories. CABG was recommended for 7 (5.03%) patients. Stented territory was LAD 37 (45.7%) and RCA 32 (39.5%) and LCX 12 (14.8%).\\nConclusion: In the era of COVID-19, in this prospective cohort study, on acute STEMI patient management, we found that Pharmacoinvasive therapy, reduced patients’ symptoms and ST resolution occurred partially.\\nCardiovasc j 2023; 15(2): 136-143\",\"PeriodicalId\":9438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v15i2.65628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v15i2.65628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在covid时代,由于存在在非covid患者中传播covid的潜在威胁,通过初级PCI (pPCI)治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的数量在全球范围内急剧下降。因此,在COVID RT PCR报告之前,灰色地带的急性STEMI患者的溶栓治疗是我院急性心肌梗死患者的治疗模式。我们进行了这项前瞻性观察性研究,以观察溶栓和随后干预的结果。方法:以胸痛、心电图和hs-肌钙蛋白- i向急诊科就诊的STEMI患者均为急性STEMI患者。共纳入139例患者(男性120例,女性54例);男性平均年龄:54岁。,女:56岁。所有患者均在CCU的灰色区域接受溶栓治疗。将COVID-19患者排除在干预措施之外并进行保守管理。新冠阴性患者继续转入CCU绿区。纤溶后平均2.1天,择期行PCI。对48例接受药物侵入治疗的患者进行数据分析。结果:研究人群中Covid-19阳性11例(7.9%),阴性128例(92.1%)。7例(5.03%)患者行首次PCI。其余患者采用药物侵入治疗。89例(64%)患者使用Tenecteplase (TNK)溶栓,25例(17.9%)患者使用Streptokinase溶栓,18例(12.9%)患者由于就诊较晚而未接受任何溶栓治疗。胸痛至针刺时间为7.2±12.7h。溶栓至球囊时间为117.5±314.8h。20例(41.6%)患者狭窄消退超过50%,21例(43.8%)患者溶栓后1小时胸痛消退。10例(20.8%)患者出现。从门到针的时间为30分钟。总共在83个地区部署了88个支架。推荐冠脉搭桥7例(5.03%)。支架区域为LAD 37(45.7%)、RCA 32(39.5%)和lcx12(14.8%)。结论:在COVID-19时代,在本前瞻性队列研究中,对急性STEMI患者的管理,我们发现药物侵入治疗,减轻了患者的症状,部分缓解了ST。心血管病[j] 2023;15 (2): 136 - 143
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacoinvasive Therapy in Treating Acute STEMI Patients in Covid-19 Era
Background: Treating acute ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients by primary PCI (pPCI) has dramatically fallen globally in covid era as there is chances of potential threat of spreading COVID among the non-COVID patients. Thereby, thrombolysis of acute STEMI patient in grey zone till COVID RT PCR report to come, was the mode of treatment of acute myocardial infarction patient in our hospital. We have carried out this prospective observational study to see the outcomes of thrombolysis and subsequent intervention. Methods: STEMI patient who presented to our emergency department with chest pain and ECG and hs-Troponin-I evidenced acute STEMI, were enrolled in the study. Total 139 patients enrolled (Male:120, Female :54); average age for Male: 54 yrs., female was: 56yrs. All patients were admitted in the grey zone of CCU where thrombolysis was done.  COVID-19 patients were excluded from intervention and managed conservatively. Covid Negative patients were kept transferred to CCU green zone. On average 2.1 days after Fibrinolysis, elective PCI carried out. Data analysis from 48 patients who underwent pharmacoinvasive therapy was done. Results: Among the study population, Covid-19 positive was in 11 (7.9%) patients and Covid-19 was negative in 128 (92.1%) patients. Primary PCI was performed in 7 (5.03%) patients. Rest of the patients were managed by Pharmacoinvasive therapy. Thrombolysis by Tenecteplase (TNK) was done in 89 (64%) patients, and by Streptokinase in 25 (17.9%) patients, 18 (12.9%) patients did not receive any thrombolysis due to late presentation. Chest pain to needle time was 7.2 ±12.7hrs., thrombolysis to balloon time was 117.5 ±314.8hrs. More than 50% stenosis resolution observed in 20 (41.6%) patients, chest pain resolution within one hour of thrombolysis observed in 21 (43.8%) patients. Ten (20.8%) patients developed. Door to needle time was 30 mins. Total, 88 stents were deployed in 83 territories. CABG was recommended for 7 (5.03%) patients. Stented territory was LAD 37 (45.7%) and RCA 32 (39.5%) and LCX 12 (14.8%). Conclusion: In the era of COVID-19, in this prospective cohort study, on acute STEMI patient management, we found that Pharmacoinvasive therapy, reduced patients’ symptoms and ST resolution occurred partially. Cardiovasc j 2023; 15(2): 136-143
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early Outcome of Off-Pump Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in a Specialized center in Bangladesh Historic photos related to Cardiac Surgery in Bangladesh Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcome Between Intermittent Intravenous Heparin versus Continuous Heparin Infusion after Initial Bolus Dose during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Use of the Left Ventricular Internal Dimension at End-Diastole and the Mitral Valve E-Point Septal Separation Ratio in the Prediction of the Left Ventricular Systolic Function Remembering Christiaan Barnard in Philately
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1