集成特征和实例选择技术的意见挖掘

IF 0.5 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.4018/ijdwm.2020070109
Zi-Hung You, Ya-Han Hu, Chih-Fong Tsai, Yen-Ming Kuo
{"title":"集成特征和实例选择技术的意见挖掘","authors":"Zi-Hung You, Ya-Han Hu, Chih-Fong Tsai, Yen-Ming Kuo","doi":"10.4018/ijdwm.2020070109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opinion mining focuses on extracting polarity information from texts. For textual term representation,differentfeatureselectionmethods,e.g.termfrequency(TF)ortermfrequency– inverse document frequency (TF–IDF), can yield diverse numbers of text features. In text classification,however,aselectedtrainingsetmaycontainnoisydocuments(oroutliers),which candegrade theclassificationperformance.Tosolve thisproblem, instanceselectioncanbe adoptedtofilteroutunrepresentativetrainingdocuments.Therefore,thisarticleinvestigatesthe opinionminingperformanceassociatedwithfeatureandinstanceselectionstepssimultaneously. Two combination processes based on performing feature selection and instance selection in differentorders,werecompared.Specifically, twofeatureselectionmethods,namelyTFand TF–IDF, and two instance selection methods, namely DROP3 and IB3, were employed for comparison. The experimental results by using three Twitter datasets to develop sentiment classifiersshowedthatTF–IDFfollowedbyDROP3performsthebest. KeyWORDS Feature Selection, Instance Selection, Opinion Mining, Text Classification","PeriodicalId":54963,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Feature and Instance Selection Techniques in Opinion Mining\",\"authors\":\"Zi-Hung You, Ya-Han Hu, Chih-Fong Tsai, Yen-Ming Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijdwm.2020070109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Opinion mining focuses on extracting polarity information from texts. For textual term representation,differentfeatureselectionmethods,e.g.termfrequency(TF)ortermfrequency– inverse document frequency (TF–IDF), can yield diverse numbers of text features. In text classification,however,aselectedtrainingsetmaycontainnoisydocuments(oroutliers),which candegrade theclassificationperformance.Tosolve thisproblem, instanceselectioncanbe adoptedtofilteroutunrepresentativetrainingdocuments.Therefore,thisarticleinvestigatesthe opinionminingperformanceassociatedwithfeatureandinstanceselectionstepssimultaneously. Two combination processes based on performing feature selection and instance selection in differentorders,werecompared.Specifically, twofeatureselectionmethods,namelyTFand TF–IDF, and two instance selection methods, namely DROP3 and IB3, were employed for comparison. The experimental results by using three Twitter datasets to develop sentiment classifiersshowedthatTF–IDFfollowedbyDROP3performsthebest. KeyWORDS Feature Selection, Instance Selection, Opinion Mining, Text Classification\",\"PeriodicalId\":54963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdwm.2020070109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdwm.2020070109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

观点挖掘侧重于从文本中提取极性信息。对于text_term表示,differentfeatureselectionmethods,e.g.termfrequency(TF)ortermfrequency - inverse_document_frequency_ (TF - idf), can_yield_diverse_numbers_ of text_features。> > text>分类,however,aselectedtrainingsetmaycontainnoisydocuments(oroutliers),which candegrade theclassificationperformance。Tosolve thisproblem, instanceselectioncanbe adoptedtofilteroutunrepresentativetrainingdocuments。Therefore,thisarticleinvestigatesthe opinionminingperformanceassociatedwithfeatureandinstanceselectionstepssimultaneously。两个组合过程基于在differentorders,werecompared中执行featureselection_和instanceselection_。我们使用了Specifically、twofeatureselectionmethods、namelyTFand TF-IDF和两个实例选择方法(drop3和IB3)进行比较。实验结果是通过使用三个twitter数据集来发展情绪classifiersshowedthatTF-IDFfollowedbyDROP3performsthebest。关键词特征选择,实例选择,意见挖掘,文本分类
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating Feature and Instance Selection Techniques in Opinion Mining
Opinion mining focuses on extracting polarity information from texts. For textual term representation,differentfeatureselectionmethods,e.g.termfrequency(TF)ortermfrequency– inverse document frequency (TF–IDF), can yield diverse numbers of text features. In text classification,however,aselectedtrainingsetmaycontainnoisydocuments(oroutliers),which candegrade theclassificationperformance.Tosolve thisproblem, instanceselectioncanbe adoptedtofilteroutunrepresentativetrainingdocuments.Therefore,thisarticleinvestigatesthe opinionminingperformanceassociatedwithfeatureandinstanceselectionstepssimultaneously. Two combination processes based on performing feature selection and instance selection in differentorders,werecompared.Specifically, twofeatureselectionmethods,namelyTFand TF–IDF, and two instance selection methods, namely DROP3 and IB3, were employed for comparison. The experimental results by using three Twitter datasets to develop sentiment classifiersshowedthatTF–IDFfollowedbyDROP3performsthebest. KeyWORDS Feature Selection, Instance Selection, Opinion Mining, Text Classification
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining
International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM) disseminates the latest international research findings in the areas of data management and analyzation. IJDWM provides a forum for state-of-the-art developments and research, as well as current innovative activities focusing on the integration between the fields of data warehousing and data mining. Emphasizing applicability to real world problems, this journal meets the needs of both academic researchers and practicing IT professionals.The journal is devoted to the publications of high quality papers on theoretical developments and practical applications in data warehousing and data mining. Original research papers, state-of-the-art reviews, and technical notes are invited for publications. The journal accepts paper submission of any work relevant to data warehousing and data mining. Special attention will be given to papers focusing on mining of data from data warehouses; integration of databases, data warehousing, and data mining; and holistic approaches to mining and archiving
期刊最新文献
Fishing Vessel Type Recognition Based on Semantic Feature Vector Optimizing Cadet Squad Organizational Satisfaction by Integrating Leadership Factor Data Mining and Integer Programming Hybrid Inductive Graph Method for Matrix Completion A Fuzzy Portfolio Model With Cardinality Constraints Based on Differential Evolution Algorithms Dynamic Research on Youth Thought, Behavior, and Growth Law Based on Deep Learning Algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1