人工智能与劳动

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q1 HISTORY Labour-Le Travail Pub Date : 2022-11-25 DOI:10.52975/llt.2022v90.009
Kayla Hilstob, Alicia Massie
{"title":"人工智能与劳动","authors":"Kayla Hilstob, Alicia Massie","doi":"10.52975/llt.2022v90.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are in an important technological moment in history, where experts in academia, research institutes, and non-governmental organizations posit that developments in artificial intelligence (ai) will lead to widespread disruptions in the labour market. This article addresses this claim by asking if organized labour sees ai as an equally imminent threat. Moreover, it asks how labour is preparing to challenge the power of capital as employers leverage automation in an age of neoliberal precarity. Online materials published by unions affiliated with the Canadian Labour Congress are reviewed here through discursive analysis. Our findings indicate that while no union has expressed opposition to technological change, many have questioned how employers leverage it in the workplace and its wider geopolitical and societal effects that affect their members and communities. We find that discussion around technological change emphasizes that technology makes work better and safer in a human-centred work environment. Overall, organized labour in Canada is attentive to issues within the political-economic context of automation, precarious work, community impacts, the role of government and regulation, skills and retraining, and job loss, among others. Given the view of technology held by organized labour, we challenge perspectives of both techno-pessimism and techno-optimism and highlight instead that labour unions are in a unique position to both respond and adapt to the evolution of work. Expanded strategic interventions around automation are needed to combat precarious work and the erosion of working conditions at present and in the coming decade(s), and we point to some notable efforts that are underway.","PeriodicalId":33140,"journal":{"name":"Labour-Le Travail","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Labour\",\"authors\":\"Kayla Hilstob, Alicia Massie\",\"doi\":\"10.52975/llt.2022v90.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are in an important technological moment in history, where experts in academia, research institutes, and non-governmental organizations posit that developments in artificial intelligence (ai) will lead to widespread disruptions in the labour market. This article addresses this claim by asking if organized labour sees ai as an equally imminent threat. Moreover, it asks how labour is preparing to challenge the power of capital as employers leverage automation in an age of neoliberal precarity. Online materials published by unions affiliated with the Canadian Labour Congress are reviewed here through discursive analysis. Our findings indicate that while no union has expressed opposition to technological change, many have questioned how employers leverage it in the workplace and its wider geopolitical and societal effects that affect their members and communities. We find that discussion around technological change emphasizes that technology makes work better and safer in a human-centred work environment. Overall, organized labour in Canada is attentive to issues within the political-economic context of automation, precarious work, community impacts, the role of government and regulation, skills and retraining, and job loss, among others. Given the view of technology held by organized labour, we challenge perspectives of both techno-pessimism and techno-optimism and highlight instead that labour unions are in a unique position to both respond and adapt to the evolution of work. Expanded strategic interventions around automation are needed to combat precarious work and the erosion of working conditions at present and in the coming decade(s), and we point to some notable efforts that are underway.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labour-Le Travail\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labour-Le Travail\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52975/llt.2022v90.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour-Le Travail","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52975/llt.2022v90.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们正处于历史上一个重要的技术时刻,学术界、研究机构和非政府组织的专家认为,人工智能(ai)的发展将导致劳动力市场的广泛中断。本文通过询问有组织的劳工是否将人工智能视为同样迫在眉睫的威胁来解决这一说法。此外,它还提出,在新自由主义不稳定的时代,随着雇主利用自动化,劳动力准备如何挑战资本的力量。加拿大劳工大会下属工会发布的在线材料在这里通过话语分析进行审查。我们的研究结果表明,虽然没有工会表示反对技术变革,但许多工会质疑雇主如何在工作场所利用它,以及它对其成员和社区产生的更广泛的地缘政治和社会影响。我们发现,围绕技术变革的讨论强调,在以人为中心的工作环境中,技术使工作变得更好、更安全。总体而言,加拿大有组织的劳工关注自动化、不稳定工作、社区影响、政府和监管的作用、技能和再培训以及失业等政治经济背景下的问题。鉴于有组织的劳工所持有的技术观点,我们挑战技术悲观主义和技术乐观主义的观点,并强调工会在应对和适应工作演变方面处于独特的地位。目前和未来十年,需要围绕自动化扩大战略干预,以对抗不稳定的工作和工作条件的恶化,我们指出了一些正在进行的显著努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial Intelligence and Labour
We are in an important technological moment in history, where experts in academia, research institutes, and non-governmental organizations posit that developments in artificial intelligence (ai) will lead to widespread disruptions in the labour market. This article addresses this claim by asking if organized labour sees ai as an equally imminent threat. Moreover, it asks how labour is preparing to challenge the power of capital as employers leverage automation in an age of neoliberal precarity. Online materials published by unions affiliated with the Canadian Labour Congress are reviewed here through discursive analysis. Our findings indicate that while no union has expressed opposition to technological change, many have questioned how employers leverage it in the workplace and its wider geopolitical and societal effects that affect their members and communities. We find that discussion around technological change emphasizes that technology makes work better and safer in a human-centred work environment. Overall, organized labour in Canada is attentive to issues within the political-economic context of automation, precarious work, community impacts, the role of government and regulation, skills and retraining, and job loss, among others. Given the view of technology held by organized labour, we challenge perspectives of both techno-pessimism and techno-optimism and highlight instead that labour unions are in a unique position to both respond and adapt to the evolution of work. Expanded strategic interventions around automation are needed to combat precarious work and the erosion of working conditions at present and in the coming decade(s), and we point to some notable efforts that are underway.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labour-Le Travail
Labour-Le Travail Multiple-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Jacinthe Michaud, Frontiers of Feminism: Movements and Influences in Québec and Italy, 1960–1980 (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2021) Krys Maki, Ineligible: Single Mothers Under Welfare Surveillance (Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing 2021) Mark Doussar and Greg Schrock, Justice at work: The Rise of Economic and Racial Justice Coalitions in Cities (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2022) Left Americana and the Ludlow Monument Contributors / Collaborateurs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1