幼儿园教师话语:科学课教师话语分析

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.17
A. Menti, M.P. Paolantonio, S. Carignano, M.P. Dutari
{"title":"幼儿园教师话语:科学课教师话语分析","authors":"A. Menti, M.P. Paolantonio, S. Carignano, M.P. Dutari","doi":"10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper st udies the organization of teachers’ utterances taking into account whether they belong to academic or social discourse, and the pragmatic function that teachers’ utterances play within each dis- course modality. The data consist of four class hours of video-recorded material obtained during obser-vations of teaching situations in two five-year-old kindergarten groups. One kindergarten belongs to a rural school and the other one, to an urban school. We used qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The results showed that both teachers generated similar discursive contexts in Science lessons. Teachers used more utterances during the development of academic discourse than during social discourse. Within social discourse, the teachers used most of their utterances to issue directives. Within academic discourse, they used most utterances to request information from kindergartners. In this case, the rural teacher and the urban teacher produced similar percentages of utterances for commenting on and evaluating chil- dren's responses. Results suggest that it is important to continue studying the pedagogical implications of teaching practices in Science lessons as well as detecting teachers’ training opportunities in classroom dialogue and practices that promote the development of scientific thinking in kindergarteners.","PeriodicalId":43406,"journal":{"name":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers' discourse in kindergarten: An analysis of teachers' utterances in science lessons\",\"authors\":\"A. Menti, M.P. Paolantonio, S. Carignano, M.P. Dutari\",\"doi\":\"10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper st udies the organization of teachers’ utterances taking into account whether they belong to academic or social discourse, and the pragmatic function that teachers’ utterances play within each dis- course modality. The data consist of four class hours of video-recorded material obtained during obser-vations of teaching situations in two five-year-old kindergarten groups. One kindergarten belongs to a rural school and the other one, to an urban school. We used qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The results showed that both teachers generated similar discursive contexts in Science lessons. Teachers used more utterances during the development of academic discourse than during social discourse. Within social discourse, the teachers used most of their utterances to issue directives. Within academic discourse, they used most utterances to request information from kindergartners. In this case, the rural teacher and the urban teacher produced similar percentages of utterances for commenting on and evaluating chil- dren's responses. Results suggest that it is important to continue studying the pedagogical implications of teaching practices in Science lessons as well as detecting teachers’ training opportunities in classroom dialogue and practices that promote the development of scientific thinking in kindergarteners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了教师话语的组织,包括教师话语是属于学术话语还是社会话语,以及教师话语在每种话语形态中所发挥的语用功能。本研究的数据是在观察两个五岁幼儿园小组的教学情况时所获得的四个课时的录像资料。一所幼儿园属于农村学校,另一所属于城市学校。我们采用定性和定量数据分析。结果表明,两位教师在科学课上产生了相似的话语语境。教师在学术话语发展过程中使用的话语比在社会话语发展过程中使用的话语要多。在社会话语中,教师的话语主要用于发布指令。在学术话语中,他们使用最多的话语是向幼儿园儿童询问信息。在这种情况下,农村教师和城市教师发表评论和评价儿童反应的话语百分比相似。研究结果表明,继续研究科学课教学实践的教学意义,并在课堂对话和实践中发现教师的培训机会,促进幼儿园儿童科学思维的发展是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teachers' discourse in kindergarten: An analysis of teachers' utterances in science lessons
This paper st udies the organization of teachers’ utterances taking into account whether they belong to academic or social discourse, and the pragmatic function that teachers’ utterances play within each dis- course modality. The data consist of four class hours of video-recorded material obtained during obser-vations of teaching situations in two five-year-old kindergarten groups. One kindergarten belongs to a rural school and the other one, to an urban school. We used qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The results showed that both teachers generated similar discursive contexts in Science lessons. Teachers used more utterances during the development of academic discourse than during social discourse. Within social discourse, the teachers used most of their utterances to issue directives. Within academic discourse, they used most utterances to request information from kindergartners. In this case, the rural teacher and the urban teacher produced similar percentages of utterances for commenting on and evaluating chil- dren's responses. Results suggest that it is important to continue studying the pedagogical implications of teaching practices in Science lessons as well as detecting teachers’ training opportunities in classroom dialogue and practices that promote the development of scientific thinking in kindergarteners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Writing to Learn History: An Instructional Design Study High school students’ attentional stance, modes of reading engagement, and self-insight during literary reading Developing the “Language Profile Test” for Greek Students aged 11-15 Years. Strategies for Expository and Literary Texts Separating the relevant from the irrelevant: Factors influencing L1 student teachers’ ability to discern (ir)relevant arguments in time-pressured grammatical discussions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1