{"title":"对数字环境中欺诈和科学诚信的观察","authors":"M. LaFollette","doi":"10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999%3C::AID-ASI1050%3E3.0.CO;2-C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The community of specialists in scientific information and communication must begin to give more vigorous attention to its expectations for ethical conduct by authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers in the realm of electronic publishing, and to consider how those expectations may differ from the standards applied in a print‐based environment. The author suggests five areas that deserve special attention: ensuring the accuracy and truthfulness of content; building trust among editors, reviewers, and authors; sustaining a level of civility in electronic forums for scientific and technical debate; protecting the intellectual property of authors and publishers; and preserving publishers' (and scientific journals) independence from government interference with content.","PeriodicalId":50013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"1334-1337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observations on fraud and scientific integrity in a digital environment\",\"authors\":\"M. LaFollette\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999%3C::AID-ASI1050%3E3.0.CO;2-C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The community of specialists in scientific information and communication must begin to give more vigorous attention to its expectations for ethical conduct by authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers in the realm of electronic publishing, and to consider how those expectations may differ from the standards applied in a print‐based environment. The author suggests five areas that deserve special attention: ensuring the accuracy and truthfulness of content; building trust among editors, reviewers, and authors; sustaining a level of civility in electronic forums for scientific and technical debate; protecting the intellectual property of authors and publishers; and preserving publishers' (and scientific journals) independence from government interference with content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"1334-1337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999%3C::AID-ASI1050%3E3.0.CO;2-C\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999%3C::AID-ASI1050%3E3.0.CO;2-C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

科学信息和传播领域的专家团体必须开始更加积极地关注他们对电子出版领域的作者、审稿人、编辑和出版商的道德行为的期望,并考虑这些期望与基于印刷的环境中应用的标准有何不同。笔者提出了五个需要特别注意的方面:保证内容的准确性和真实性;在编辑、审稿人和作者之间建立信任;在科技辩论的电子论坛上保持一定程度的文明;保护作者和出版者的知识产权;保持出版商(和科学期刊)的独立性,不受政府对内容的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observations on fraud and scientific integrity in a digital environment
The community of specialists in scientific information and communication must begin to give more vigorous attention to its expectations for ethical conduct by authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers in the realm of electronic publishing, and to consider how those expectations may differ from the standards applied in a print‐based environment. The author suggests five areas that deserve special attention: ensuring the accuracy and truthfulness of content; building trust among editors, reviewers, and authors; sustaining a level of civility in electronic forums for scientific and technical debate; protecting the intellectual property of authors and publishers; and preserving publishers' (and scientific journals) independence from government interference with content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊最新文献
Information Resources Management in the Twenty-First Century: Challenges, Prospects, and the Librarian’s Role Technical Infrastructure to Support Public Value Co-creation in Smart City Perceived Usefulness of Web 2.0 Tools for Knowledge Management by University Undergraduate Students: A Review of Literature Group Emotion Recognition for Weibo Topics Based on BERT with TextCNN Research on the Service of Special Collections of University Libraries Empowered by Intelligent Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1