戴德金严谨数学的形成:戴德金的草稿告诉我们他的严谨理想是什么?

Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1215/00294527-2021-0001
Emmylou Haffner
{"title":"戴德金严谨数学的形成:戴德金的草稿告诉我们他的严谨理想是什么?","authors":"Emmylou Haffner","doi":"10.1215/00294527-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I propose to examine Dedekind’s ideal of rigor in the context of some of his mathematical drafts. After a presentation of his ideal of rigor based on statements in his published works, I use drafts from his Nachlass to study his invention of the new concept of Dualgruppe (equivalent to our modern lattice). I question the extent to which these preliminary researches hold up to the same standards of rigor. Focusing on a specific law of Dualgruppe theory, I show that the elaboration of a rigorous work can be the outcome of a process that is not necessarily so. I put forward the trial-and-error and inductive aspects of Dedekind’s research practices. I consider whether the Dedekindian ideal of rigor guided mathematical research in its various phases, and what the consequences were of such an ideal of rigor, if any, on mathematical research.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Shaping of Dedekind's Rigorous Mathematics: What Do Dedekind's Drafts Tell Us about His Ideal of Rigor?\",\"authors\":\"Emmylou Haffner\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00294527-2021-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I propose to examine Dedekind’s ideal of rigor in the context of some of his mathematical drafts. After a presentation of his ideal of rigor based on statements in his published works, I use drafts from his Nachlass to study his invention of the new concept of Dualgruppe (equivalent to our modern lattice). I question the extent to which these preliminary researches hold up to the same standards of rigor. Focusing on a specific law of Dualgruppe theory, I show that the elaboration of a rigorous work can be the outcome of a process that is not necessarily so. I put forward the trial-and-error and inductive aspects of Dedekind’s research practices. I consider whether the Dedekindian ideal of rigor guided mathematical research in its various phases, and what the consequences were of such an ideal of rigor, if any, on mathematical research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2021-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我打算在戴德金德的一些数学草稿的背景下检验他的严谨理想。在介绍了他的严谨理想之后,我使用了他的Nachlass草稿来研究他发明的双群(相当于我们现代的格)的新概念。我怀疑这些初步研究在多大程度上能达到同样的严格标准。我将重点放在双群理论的一个特定规律上,表明严谨工作的细化可能是一个不一定如此的过程的结果。我提出了Dedekind研究实践的试错和归纳两个方面。我考虑戴德金的严谨理想是否在数学研究的各个阶段指导了数学研究,以及这种严谨理想(如果有的话)对数学研究的影响是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
The Shaping of Dedekind's Rigorous Mathematics: What Do Dedekind's Drafts Tell Us about His Ideal of Rigor?
In this paper, I propose to examine Dedekind’s ideal of rigor in the context of some of his mathematical drafts. After a presentation of his ideal of rigor based on statements in his published works, I use drafts from his Nachlass to study his invention of the new concept of Dualgruppe (equivalent to our modern lattice). I question the extent to which these preliminary researches hold up to the same standards of rigor. Focusing on a specific law of Dualgruppe theory, I show that the elaboration of a rigorous work can be the outcome of a process that is not necessarily so. I put forward the trial-and-error and inductive aspects of Dedekind’s research practices. I consider whether the Dedekindian ideal of rigor guided mathematical research in its various phases, and what the consequences were of such an ideal of rigor, if any, on mathematical research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1