急性髓性白血病、弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者诊断后第一年的辐射暴露

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Polish Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2023.125008
Başak Ünver Koluman, Muhammet Arslan, Hande Şenol, Sibel Kabukçu Hacıoğlu, Gülsüm Akgün Çağlıyan, Nil Güler, Nilay Şen Türk
{"title":"急性髓性白血病、弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者诊断后第一年的辐射暴露","authors":"Başak Ünver Koluman,&nbsp;Muhammet Arslan,&nbsp;Hande Şenol,&nbsp;Sibel Kabukçu Hacıoğlu,&nbsp;Gülsüm Akgün Çağlıyan,&nbsp;Nil Güler,&nbsp;Nilay Şen Türk","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2023.125008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiological examinations are critical in the evaluation of patients with haematological malignancies for diagnosis and treatment. Any dose of radiation has been shown in studies to be harmful. In this regard, we assessed the radiation exposure of 3 types of haematological malignancies (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], acute myeloid leukaemia [AML], and multiple myeloma [MM]) in our centre during the first year after diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In the first year after diagnosis we retrospectively reviewed the radiation exposure data of 3 types of haematological malignancies (DLBCL, AML, and MM). The total and median CED value (cumulative effective radiation dose in millisieverts [mSv]) of each patient was used. Each patient's total and median estimated CED value was calculated using a web-based calculator and recorded in millisieverts (mSv).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total radiation doses in one year after diagnosis (CED value) were 46.54 ± 37.12 (median dose: 36.2) in the AML group; 63.00 ± 42.05 (median dose: 66.4) in the DLBCL group; and 28.04 ± 19.81 (median dose: 26.0) in the MM group (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). There was a significant difference between DLBCL and MM groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In all 3 haematological malignancies, the radiation exposure was significant, especially in the DBLCL group, within the first year of diagnosis. It is critical to seek methods to reduce these dosage levels. In diagnostic radiology, reference values must be established to increase awareness and self-control and reduce patient radiation exposure. This paper is also the first to offer thorough details on the subject at hand, and we think it can serve as a guide for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/73/PJR-88-50129.PMC9995242.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation exposure in acute myeloid leukaemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma patients in the first year following diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Başak Ünver Koluman,&nbsp;Muhammet Arslan,&nbsp;Hande Şenol,&nbsp;Sibel Kabukçu Hacıoğlu,&nbsp;Gülsüm Akgün Çağlıyan,&nbsp;Nil Güler,&nbsp;Nilay Şen Türk\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2023.125008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiological examinations are critical in the evaluation of patients with haematological malignancies for diagnosis and treatment. Any dose of radiation has been shown in studies to be harmful. In this regard, we assessed the radiation exposure of 3 types of haematological malignancies (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], acute myeloid leukaemia [AML], and multiple myeloma [MM]) in our centre during the first year after diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In the first year after diagnosis we retrospectively reviewed the radiation exposure data of 3 types of haematological malignancies (DLBCL, AML, and MM). The total and median CED value (cumulative effective radiation dose in millisieverts [mSv]) of each patient was used. Each patient's total and median estimated CED value was calculated using a web-based calculator and recorded in millisieverts (mSv).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total radiation doses in one year after diagnosis (CED value) were 46.54 ± 37.12 (median dose: 36.2) in the AML group; 63.00 ± 42.05 (median dose: 66.4) in the DLBCL group; and 28.04 ± 19.81 (median dose: 26.0) in the MM group (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). There was a significant difference between DLBCL and MM groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In all 3 haematological malignancies, the radiation exposure was significant, especially in the DBLCL group, within the first year of diagnosis. It is critical to seek methods to reduce these dosage levels. In diagnostic radiology, reference values must be established to increase awareness and self-control and reduce patient radiation exposure. This paper is also the first to offer thorough details on the subject at hand, and we think it can serve as a guide for further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/73/PJR-88-50129.PMC9995242.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2023.125008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2023.125008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:放射学检查对血液系统恶性肿瘤的诊断和治疗具有重要的评价作用。研究表明,任何剂量的辐射都是有害的。在这方面,我们评估了3种血液学恶性肿瘤(弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)、急性髓性白血病(AML)和多发性骨髓瘤(MM))在诊断后的第一年的辐射暴露情况。材料和方法:在诊断后的第一年,我们回顾性地回顾了3种血液系统恶性肿瘤(DLBCL, AML和MM)的辐射暴露资料。使用每位患者的总和中位CED值(以毫西弗为单位的累积有效辐射剂量[mSv])。使用基于网络的计算器计算每位患者的总和中位数估计CED值,并以毫西弗(mSv)记录。结果:AML组诊断后1年总辐射剂量(CED值)为46.54±37.12(中位剂量:36.2);DLBCL组63.00±42.05(中位剂量:66.4);MM组28.04±19.81(中位剂量:26.0)(p = 0.0001)。DLBCL组与MM组间差异有统计学意义。结论:在所有3种血液系统恶性肿瘤中,在诊断的第一年,辐射暴露是显著的,特别是在DBLCL组。寻求降低这些剂量水平的方法至关重要。在诊断放射学中,必须建立参考值,以提高认识和自我控制,减少患者的辐射暴露。这篇论文也是第一篇对这个问题提供详尽细节的论文,我们认为它可以作为进一步研究的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiation exposure in acute myeloid leukaemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma patients in the first year following diagnosis.

Purpose: Radiological examinations are critical in the evaluation of patients with haematological malignancies for diagnosis and treatment. Any dose of radiation has been shown in studies to be harmful. In this regard, we assessed the radiation exposure of 3 types of haematological malignancies (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], acute myeloid leukaemia [AML], and multiple myeloma [MM]) in our centre during the first year after diagnosis.

Material and methods: In the first year after diagnosis we retrospectively reviewed the radiation exposure data of 3 types of haematological malignancies (DLBCL, AML, and MM). The total and median CED value (cumulative effective radiation dose in millisieverts [mSv]) of each patient was used. Each patient's total and median estimated CED value was calculated using a web-based calculator and recorded in millisieverts (mSv).

Results: The total radiation doses in one year after diagnosis (CED value) were 46.54 ± 37.12 (median dose: 36.2) in the AML group; 63.00 ± 42.05 (median dose: 66.4) in the DLBCL group; and 28.04 ± 19.81 (median dose: 26.0) in the MM group (p = 0.0001). There was a significant difference between DLBCL and MM groups.

Conclusions: In all 3 haematological malignancies, the radiation exposure was significant, especially in the DBLCL group, within the first year of diagnosis. It is critical to seek methods to reduce these dosage levels. In diagnostic radiology, reference values must be established to increase awareness and self-control and reduce patient radiation exposure. This paper is also the first to offer thorough details on the subject at hand, and we think it can serve as a guide for further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lung ultrasound in a nutshell. Lines, signs, some applications, and misconceptions from a radiologist's point of view. Ablation of pulmonary neoplasms: review of literature and future perspectives. Bone marrow lesions of the femoral head: can radiomics distinguish whether it is reversible? Summary of radiation dose management and optimization: comparison of radiation protection measures between Poland and other countries. Diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis - a comprehensive overview.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1