{"title":"在肾移植受者中诊断和筛查BK病毒肾病的挑战性问题,伊朗人群的多中心经验。","authors":"Fatemeh Nili, Seyed Mohammadreza Khatami, Malihe Saberafsharian, Reza Shahsiah, Yadollah Shakiba, Golnar Seirafi, Yasaman Sadeghi, Maryam Miri, Reza Ataei, Maliheh Mohamadhoseini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is an important complication of kidney transplantation and kidney biopsy remains the gold standard for its diagnosis. Urine/serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a more sensitive diagnostic method, although it has some potential limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled all kidney transplant recipients who underwent kidney transplant biopsy, collected from three medical centers. Urine and serum PCR results of the patients were also collected from the molecular laboratories. The cut-off value for positive viral DNA load in serum and urine were > 104 and > 107 copies/mL, respectively. Sensitivity, specifity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) and cut off values for PCR results were compared with pathologic diagnosis among laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 369 biopsy samples, 33 (8.9%) had definite diagnosis of BKVN. PCR results were available for 138 cases. Three patients with definite BKVN had negative PCR results. In 22 patients, PCR was positive without evidence of BKVN. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of PCR for detecting BKVN, based on a unique cut-off value, were 88, 81, 51, and 97%; respectively. The overall accuracy of PCR in all laboratories was high (82 to 86%), however significant inter-laboratory differences in sensitivity and specificity was found . A 2-log difference in threshold value for positive results was observed in one laboratory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCR may show a significant variability between different laboratories. Interpretation of PCR results using a single cut-off value for all laboratories, may decrease the sensitivity for the diagnosis and screening of BKVN. DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7143.</p>","PeriodicalId":14610,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","volume":"16 6","pages":"368-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging Issues in Diagnosis and Screening of BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients, A Multicenter Experience in Iranian Population.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Nili, Seyed Mohammadreza Khatami, Malihe Saberafsharian, Reza Shahsiah, Yadollah Shakiba, Golnar Seirafi, Yasaman Sadeghi, Maryam Miri, Reza Ataei, Maliheh Mohamadhoseini\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is an important complication of kidney transplantation and kidney biopsy remains the gold standard for its diagnosis. Urine/serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a more sensitive diagnostic method, although it has some potential limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled all kidney transplant recipients who underwent kidney transplant biopsy, collected from three medical centers. Urine and serum PCR results of the patients were also collected from the molecular laboratories. The cut-off value for positive viral DNA load in serum and urine were > 104 and > 107 copies/mL, respectively. Sensitivity, specifity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) and cut off values for PCR results were compared with pathologic diagnosis among laboratories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 369 biopsy samples, 33 (8.9%) had definite diagnosis of BKVN. PCR results were available for 138 cases. Three patients with definite BKVN had negative PCR results. In 22 patients, PCR was positive without evidence of BKVN. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of PCR for detecting BKVN, based on a unique cut-off value, were 88, 81, 51, and 97%; respectively. The overall accuracy of PCR in all laboratories was high (82 to 86%), however significant inter-laboratory differences in sensitivity and specificity was found . A 2-log difference in threshold value for positive results was observed in one laboratory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCR may show a significant variability between different laboratories. Interpretation of PCR results using a single cut-off value for all laboratories, may decrease the sensitivity for the diagnosis and screening of BKVN. DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7143.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian journal of kidney diseases\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"368-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian journal of kidney diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenging Issues in Diagnosis and Screening of BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients, A Multicenter Experience in Iranian Population.
Introduction: BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is an important complication of kidney transplantation and kidney biopsy remains the gold standard for its diagnosis. Urine/serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a more sensitive diagnostic method, although it has some potential limitations.
Methods: This study enrolled all kidney transplant recipients who underwent kidney transplant biopsy, collected from three medical centers. Urine and serum PCR results of the patients were also collected from the molecular laboratories. The cut-off value for positive viral DNA load in serum and urine were > 104 and > 107 copies/mL, respectively. Sensitivity, specifity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) and cut off values for PCR results were compared with pathologic diagnosis among laboratories.
Results: Among 369 biopsy samples, 33 (8.9%) had definite diagnosis of BKVN. PCR results were available for 138 cases. Three patients with definite BKVN had negative PCR results. In 22 patients, PCR was positive without evidence of BKVN. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of PCR for detecting BKVN, based on a unique cut-off value, were 88, 81, 51, and 97%; respectively. The overall accuracy of PCR in all laboratories was high (82 to 86%), however significant inter-laboratory differences in sensitivity and specificity was found . A 2-log difference in threshold value for positive results was observed in one laboratory.
Conclusion: PCR may show a significant variability between different laboratories. Interpretation of PCR results using a single cut-off value for all laboratories, may decrease the sensitivity for the diagnosis and screening of BKVN. DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7143.
期刊介绍:
The Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases (IJKD), a peer-reviewed journal in English, is the official publication of the Iranian Society of Nephrology. The aim of the IJKD is the worldwide reflection of the knowledge produced by the scientists and clinicians in nephrology. Published quarterly, the IJKD provides a new platform for advancement of the field. The journal’s objective is to serve as a focal point for debates and exchange of knowledge and experience among researchers in a global context. Original papers, case reports, and invited reviews on all aspects of the kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis, and transplantation will be covered by the IJKD. Research on the basic science, clinical practice, and socio-economics of renal health are all welcomed by the editors of the journal.