联网和自动驾驶汽车伤害损失事件:主要保险公司的潜在风险和精算考虑

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Risk Management and Insurance Review Pub Date : 2021-03-09 DOI:10.1111/RMIR.12168
D. Shannon, Tim Jannusch, Florian David-Spickermann, Martin Mullins, Martin Cunneen, Finbarr Murphy
{"title":"联网和自动驾驶汽车伤害损失事件:主要保险公司的潜在风险和精算考虑","authors":"D. Shannon, Tim Jannusch, Florian David-Spickermann, Martin Mullins, Martin Cunneen, Finbarr Murphy","doi":"10.1111/RMIR.12168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) to the road transport ecosystem will change the manner of collisions. CAVs are expected to optimize the safety of road users and the wider environment, while alleviating traffic congestion and maximizing occupant comfort. The net result is a reduction in the frequency of motor vehicle collisions, and a reduction in the number of injuries currently seen as “ preventable. ” A changing risk ecosystem will introduce new challenges and opportunities for primary insurers. Prior studies have highlighted the economic benefit provided by reductions in the frequency of hazardous events. This economic benefit, however, will be offset by the economic detriment incurred by emerging risks and the increased scrutiny placed on existing risks. We posit four plausible scenarios de-tailing how an introduction of these technologies could result in a larger relative rate of injury claims currently characterized as tail ‐ risk events. In such a scenario, the culmination of these losses will present as a second “ hump ” in actuarial loss models. We discuss how CAV risk factors and traffic dynamics may combine to make a second “ hump ” a plausible reality, and discuss a number of opportunities that may arise for primary insurers from a changing road environment.","PeriodicalId":35338,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Connected and autonomous vehicle injury loss events: Potential risk and actuarial considerations for primary insurers\",\"authors\":\"D. Shannon, Tim Jannusch, Florian David-Spickermann, Martin Mullins, Martin Cunneen, Finbarr Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/RMIR.12168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The introduction of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) to the road transport ecosystem will change the manner of collisions. CAVs are expected to optimize the safety of road users and the wider environment, while alleviating traffic congestion and maximizing occupant comfort. The net result is a reduction in the frequency of motor vehicle collisions, and a reduction in the number of injuries currently seen as “ preventable. ” A changing risk ecosystem will introduce new challenges and opportunities for primary insurers. Prior studies have highlighted the economic benefit provided by reductions in the frequency of hazardous events. This economic benefit, however, will be offset by the economic detriment incurred by emerging risks and the increased scrutiny placed on existing risks. We posit four plausible scenarios de-tailing how an introduction of these technologies could result in a larger relative rate of injury claims currently characterized as tail ‐ risk events. In such a scenario, the culmination of these losses will present as a second “ hump ” in actuarial loss models. We discuss how CAV risk factors and traffic dynamics may combine to make a second “ hump ” a plausible reality, and discuss a number of opportunities that may arise for primary insurers from a changing road environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Insurance Review\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Insurance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/RMIR.12168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/RMIR.12168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在道路交通生态系统中引入联网和自动驾驶汽车(cav)将改变碰撞的方式。预计自动驾驶汽车将优化道路使用者的安全性和更广泛的环境,同时缓解交通拥堵并最大限度地提高乘员的舒适度。最终的结果是减少了机动车碰撞的频率,减少了目前被认为是“可以预防的”伤害的数量。不断变化的风险生态系统将为初级保险公司带来新的挑战和机遇。先前的研究强调了减少危险事件发生频率所带来的经济效益。然而,这种经济利益将被新出现的风险和对现有风险加强审查所造成的经济损害所抵消。我们假设了四种可能的情景,详细说明了这些技术的引入如何导致目前被描述为尾部风险事件的伤害索赔的相对比例增加。在这种情况下,这些损失的顶点将在精算损失模型中表现为第二个“驼峰”。我们讨论了CAV风险因素和交通动态如何结合起来使第二个“驼峰”成为可能的现实,并讨论了不断变化的道路环境可能给初级保险公司带来的一些机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Connected and autonomous vehicle injury loss events: Potential risk and actuarial considerations for primary insurers
The introduction of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) to the road transport ecosystem will change the manner of collisions. CAVs are expected to optimize the safety of road users and the wider environment, while alleviating traffic congestion and maximizing occupant comfort. The net result is a reduction in the frequency of motor vehicle collisions, and a reduction in the number of injuries currently seen as “ preventable. ” A changing risk ecosystem will introduce new challenges and opportunities for primary insurers. Prior studies have highlighted the economic benefit provided by reductions in the frequency of hazardous events. This economic benefit, however, will be offset by the economic detriment incurred by emerging risks and the increased scrutiny placed on existing risks. We posit four plausible scenarios de-tailing how an introduction of these technologies could result in a larger relative rate of injury claims currently characterized as tail ‐ risk events. In such a scenario, the culmination of these losses will present as a second “ hump ” in actuarial loss models. We discuss how CAV risk factors and traffic dynamics may combine to make a second “ hump ” a plausible reality, and discuss a number of opportunities that may arise for primary insurers from a changing road environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Insurance Review
Risk Management and Insurance Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Insurance Review publishes respected, accessible, and high-quality applied research, and well-reasoned opinion and discussion in the field of risk and insurance. The Review"s "Feature Articles" section includes original research involving applications and applied techniques. The "Perspectives" section contains articles providing new insights on the research literature, business practice, and public policy. The "Educational Insights" section provides a repository of high-caliber model lectures in risk and insurance, along with articles discussing and evaluating instructional techniques.
期刊最新文献
Risk‐based thinking for extreme events: What do terrorism and climate change have in common? Insurance and the public–private management of risk at US commercial nuclear power plants InsurTech in the United States and Germany—What are the drivers behind the different business models? The importance of risk and insurance teaching within the ARIA mission On the correlation of self‐reported and behavioral risk attitude measures: The case of the General Risk Question and the Investment Game following Gneezy and Potters (1997)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1