https://researchopenworld.com/usability-testing-of-the-online-stress-management-intervention-stream-for-cancer-patients-results-and-implementations/#

A. Grossert, Silvia Heinz, Livia Müller, J. Gaab, C. Urech, T. Berger, Viviane Hess
{"title":"https://researchopenworld.com/usability-testing-of-the-online-stress-management-intervention-stream-for-cancer-patients-results-and-implementations/#","authors":"A. Grossert, Silvia Heinz, Livia Müller, J. Gaab, C. Urech, T. Berger, Viviane Hess","doi":"10.31038/cst.2019422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Online health interventions are becoming increasingly frequent. However, to prove effective and satisfy the specific needs of cancer patients, the standardized steps of development are crucial. This includes structured usability testing to identify potential usability issues in the patient-specific context early during the development process of a new program. Methods: Usability of a newly developed online stress management program was prospectively assessed in patients with solid tumors undergoing systemic treatment. In an academic computer-lab facility, each patient was asked to fulfill 16 tasks, which covered key components of the program including website navigation, login-in to secure area, filling-in forms, accessing audio files, and contacting the trial team. Usability problems during these tasks were identified via the think-aloud method and video recording and categorized. General usability was tested with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: A total of 165 tasks from 11 patients were analyzed. Overall usability was high (mean System Usability Scale score 83.6) exceeding the pre-defined cut-off of 70. Participants solved 97% (160/165) of all tasks, the majority (76%) independently. A total of 122 specific usability problems were identified, predominantly concerning website functionality (50.8%) and navigation (29.5%). Conclusions: Structured usability testing of a novel online intervention in the target population of cancer patients allowed for identification and subsequent correction of a significant number of usability problems. This crucial step allowed for a patient-friendly, self-explanatory online program with enhanced user-specific functionality, navigation and terminology before embarking on the subsequent randomized trial.","PeriodicalId":72517,"journal":{"name":"Cancer studies and therapeutics","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"https://researchopenworld.com/usability-testing-of-the-online-stress-management-intervention-stream-for-cancer-patients-results-and-implementations/#\",\"authors\":\"A. Grossert, Silvia Heinz, Livia Müller, J. Gaab, C. Urech, T. Berger, Viviane Hess\",\"doi\":\"10.31038/cst.2019422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Online health interventions are becoming increasingly frequent. However, to prove effective and satisfy the specific needs of cancer patients, the standardized steps of development are crucial. This includes structured usability testing to identify potential usability issues in the patient-specific context early during the development process of a new program. Methods: Usability of a newly developed online stress management program was prospectively assessed in patients with solid tumors undergoing systemic treatment. In an academic computer-lab facility, each patient was asked to fulfill 16 tasks, which covered key components of the program including website navigation, login-in to secure area, filling-in forms, accessing audio files, and contacting the trial team. Usability problems during these tasks were identified via the think-aloud method and video recording and categorized. General usability was tested with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: A total of 165 tasks from 11 patients were analyzed. Overall usability was high (mean System Usability Scale score 83.6) exceeding the pre-defined cut-off of 70. Participants solved 97% (160/165) of all tasks, the majority (76%) independently. A total of 122 specific usability problems were identified, predominantly concerning website functionality (50.8%) and navigation (29.5%). Conclusions: Structured usability testing of a novel online intervention in the target population of cancer patients allowed for identification and subsequent correction of a significant number of usability problems. This crucial step allowed for a patient-friendly, self-explanatory online program with enhanced user-specific functionality, navigation and terminology before embarking on the subsequent randomized trial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer studies and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer studies and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31038/cst.2019422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer studies and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/cst.2019422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:在线卫生干预措施正变得越来越频繁。然而,为了证明其有效性并满足癌症患者的特定需求,标准化的开发步骤至关重要。这包括结构化的可用性测试,以在新程序开发过程的早期识别患者特定环境中的潜在可用性问题。方法:前瞻性评估新开发的在线压力管理程序在接受全身治疗的实体瘤患者中的可用性。在一个学术计算机实验室设施中,每位患者被要求完成16项任务,这些任务涵盖了程序的关键组成部分,包括网站导航、登录安全区域、填写表格、访问音频文件以及与试验团队联系。这些任务中的可用性问题通过有声思考方法和视频记录进行识别和分类。一般可用性测试与系统可用性量表(SUS)。结果:共分析了11例患者的165个任务。总体可用性很高(平均系统可用性量表得分83.6),超过了预先定义的70分界点。参与者解决了97%(160/165)的任务,大多数(76%)是独立完成的。总共确定了122个特定的可用性问题,主要涉及网站功能(50.8%)和导航(29.5%)。结论:在癌症患者目标人群中,对一种新型在线干预进行结构化可用性测试,可以识别并随后纠正大量可用性问题。这一关键步骤允许在开始随后的随机试验之前,一个对患者友好的、自我解释的在线程序,具有增强的用户特定功能、导航和术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
https://researchopenworld.com/usability-testing-of-the-online-stress-management-intervention-stream-for-cancer-patients-results-and-implementations/#
Background: Online health interventions are becoming increasingly frequent. However, to prove effective and satisfy the specific needs of cancer patients, the standardized steps of development are crucial. This includes structured usability testing to identify potential usability issues in the patient-specific context early during the development process of a new program. Methods: Usability of a newly developed online stress management program was prospectively assessed in patients with solid tumors undergoing systemic treatment. In an academic computer-lab facility, each patient was asked to fulfill 16 tasks, which covered key components of the program including website navigation, login-in to secure area, filling-in forms, accessing audio files, and contacting the trial team. Usability problems during these tasks were identified via the think-aloud method and video recording and categorized. General usability was tested with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: A total of 165 tasks from 11 patients were analyzed. Overall usability was high (mean System Usability Scale score 83.6) exceeding the pre-defined cut-off of 70. Participants solved 97% (160/165) of all tasks, the majority (76%) independently. A total of 122 specific usability problems were identified, predominantly concerning website functionality (50.8%) and navigation (29.5%). Conclusions: Structured usability testing of a novel online intervention in the target population of cancer patients allowed for identification and subsequent correction of a significant number of usability problems. This crucial step allowed for a patient-friendly, self-explanatory online program with enhanced user-specific functionality, navigation and terminology before embarking on the subsequent randomized trial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fertility Preservation Among Cancer Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Hot Topic High XPO1 Expression can Stratify Gastric Cancer Patients with Poor Clinical Outcome Enhancing Patient-Centered Care in Leukemia Treatment: Insights Generated by a Mind-Set Framework Co-developed with AI Berkeley, Anti-Semitism, and AI-Suggested Remedies: Current Thinking and a Future Opportunity Three AI-synthesized Mind-sets of Patients Talking to Their Surgeon about a Prospective Operation for Different Types of Diagnosed Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1