水泥初凝对稻壳灰稳定土抗剪强度的影响

IF 2.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of Agricultural Engineering Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.4081/jae.2022.1411
N. Nahar, Alexander Owino, Z. Hossain
{"title":"水泥初凝对稻壳灰稳定土抗剪强度的影响","authors":"N. Nahar, Alexander Owino, Z. Hossain","doi":"10.4081/jae.2022.1411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determination of soil shear strength is essential for engineering construction. Using rice husk ash (RHA) with cement in the soil is a potential ground improvement technique that can reduce environmental problems and construction budget. In the present study, ten combinations of soil-RHA-cement were investigated to understand the effects of RHA with cement on the shear strength parameters of the soil. The admixtures were prepared by taking soil with 5%, 10%, 15% RHA, and 2%, 4%, and 6% cement. All specimens of soil-RHA-cement were tested after the initial setting of cement. The direct shear test was set up to compare different soil-RHA-cement mixtures under three normal stresses of 40, 60, and 80 kPa. The test results showed the difference in each mixture’s shear stress-shear displacement relationship, shear displacement- vertical displacement relationship, shear stress-normal stress relationship, shear strength, cohesion, and internal friction angle. According to the findings, shear strength improved as the cement ratio increased for the same amount of RHA in the soil, while dilatancy reduced compared to untreated soil. All soil-RHA-cement combinations had a stronger cohesiveness than untreated soil, but the angle of internal friction was lower. Under normal stress of 80 kPa, the soil with 5% RHA and 6% cement combination had the highest shear strength, corresponding to 62.9 kPa, and can be suggested for ground development.","PeriodicalId":48507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the initial setting of cement on the shear strength of rice husk ash stabilised soil\",\"authors\":\"N. Nahar, Alexander Owino, Z. Hossain\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/jae.2022.1411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Determination of soil shear strength is essential for engineering construction. Using rice husk ash (RHA) with cement in the soil is a potential ground improvement technique that can reduce environmental problems and construction budget. In the present study, ten combinations of soil-RHA-cement were investigated to understand the effects of RHA with cement on the shear strength parameters of the soil. The admixtures were prepared by taking soil with 5%, 10%, 15% RHA, and 2%, 4%, and 6% cement. All specimens of soil-RHA-cement were tested after the initial setting of cement. The direct shear test was set up to compare different soil-RHA-cement mixtures under three normal stresses of 40, 60, and 80 kPa. The test results showed the difference in each mixture’s shear stress-shear displacement relationship, shear displacement- vertical displacement relationship, shear stress-normal stress relationship, shear strength, cohesion, and internal friction angle. According to the findings, shear strength improved as the cement ratio increased for the same amount of RHA in the soil, while dilatancy reduced compared to untreated soil. All soil-RHA-cement combinations had a stronger cohesiveness than untreated soil, but the angle of internal friction was lower. Under normal stress of 80 kPa, the soil with 5% RHA and 6% cement combination had the highest shear strength, corresponding to 62.9 kPa, and can be suggested for ground development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2022.1411\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2022.1411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土抗剪强度的确定是工程建设的重要内容。稻壳灰与水泥在土壤中混合使用是一种有潜力的土地改良技术,可以减少环境问题和施工预算。为了了解RHA与水泥对土体抗剪强度参数的影响,研究了10种RHA与水泥的组合。分别取含5%、10%、15% RHA和2%、4%、6%水泥的土配制外加剂。在水泥初凝后对土-水泥混凝土试件进行试验。建立了直剪试验,比较了40、60、80 kPa法向应力下不同土-水泥混合料的直剪性能。试验结果表明,不同混合料的剪应力-剪切位移关系、剪切位移-竖向位移关系、剪应力-法向应力关系、抗剪强度、黏聚力和内摩擦角存在差异。结果表明,相同RHA用量的土中,随着水泥比的增加,抗剪强度有所提高,而剪胀率与未处理土相比有所降低。土- rhaa -水泥组合均具有较强的粘结性,但内摩擦角较低。在80 kPa的正应力下,5% RHA和6%水泥组合的土抗剪强度最高,为62.9 kPa,可建议进行地基开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of the initial setting of cement on the shear strength of rice husk ash stabilised soil
Determination of soil shear strength is essential for engineering construction. Using rice husk ash (RHA) with cement in the soil is a potential ground improvement technique that can reduce environmental problems and construction budget. In the present study, ten combinations of soil-RHA-cement were investigated to understand the effects of RHA with cement on the shear strength parameters of the soil. The admixtures were prepared by taking soil with 5%, 10%, 15% RHA, and 2%, 4%, and 6% cement. All specimens of soil-RHA-cement were tested after the initial setting of cement. The direct shear test was set up to compare different soil-RHA-cement mixtures under three normal stresses of 40, 60, and 80 kPa. The test results showed the difference in each mixture’s shear stress-shear displacement relationship, shear displacement- vertical displacement relationship, shear stress-normal stress relationship, shear strength, cohesion, and internal friction angle. According to the findings, shear strength improved as the cement ratio increased for the same amount of RHA in the soil, while dilatancy reduced compared to untreated soil. All soil-RHA-cement combinations had a stronger cohesiveness than untreated soil, but the angle of internal friction was lower. Under normal stress of 80 kPa, the soil with 5% RHA and 6% cement combination had the highest shear strength, corresponding to 62.9 kPa, and can be suggested for ground development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Journal of Agricultural Engineering AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural Engineering (JAE) is the official journal of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering supported by University of Bologna, Italy. The subject matter covers a complete and interdisciplinary range of research in engineering for agriculture and biosystems.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two different artificial neural network models for prediction of soil penetration resistance Apple recognition and picking sequence planning for harvesting robot in the complex environment Monitoring and multi-scenario simulation of agricultural land changes using Landsat imageries and FLUS model on coastal Alanya Variable-rate spray system for unmanned aerial applications using lag compensation algorithm and pulse width modulation spray technology Comparative analysis of 2D and 3D vineyard yield prediction system using artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1