停止非婚同居和共同抚养宠物

Q2 Social Sciences Derecho Animal Pub Date : 2019-01-17 DOI:10.5565/rev/da.412
Margherita Pittalis
{"title":"停止非婚同居和共同抚养宠物","authors":"Margherita Pittalis","doi":"10.5565/rev/da.412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a judgment, the Court of First Instance in Rome establishes shared custody of the family pet in in the aftermath of an extra-marital cohabitation cessation and consequent partners’ disagreement on the issue.  The Court indicates rules of conduct for pet custody and maintenance.  Court’s decision grounds on the analogical application of the norms about custody of children and on the evaluation of the material, spiritual ad affective interest of the pet. The author highlights the remarkable court’s attempt in overcoming the traditional concept of pets conceived as res and, starting from this decision, indicates which perspectives the law can follow in this respect.","PeriodicalId":36357,"journal":{"name":"Derecho Animal","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cessation of non-marital cohabitation and shared custody of pets\",\"authors\":\"Margherita Pittalis\",\"doi\":\"10.5565/rev/da.412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a judgment, the Court of First Instance in Rome establishes shared custody of the family pet in in the aftermath of an extra-marital cohabitation cessation and consequent partners’ disagreement on the issue.  The Court indicates rules of conduct for pet custody and maintenance.  Court’s decision grounds on the analogical application of the norms about custody of children and on the evaluation of the material, spiritual ad affective interest of the pet. The author highlights the remarkable court’s attempt in overcoming the traditional concept of pets conceived as res and, starting from this decision, indicates which perspectives the law can follow in this respect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Derecho Animal\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Derecho Animal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho Animal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/da.412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

罗马初审法院在一项判决中规定,在终止婚外同居以及随后双方在这一问题上产生分歧的情况下,夫妻双方共同拥有家庭宠物的监护权。法院规定了宠物监护和抚养的行为规则。法院的判决基于对儿童监护规范的类比适用,以及对宠物的物质、精神和情感利益的评估。作者强调了卓越的法院在克服宠物被视为财产的传统观念方面的尝试,并从这一决定出发,指出了法律在这方面可以遵循的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cessation of non-marital cohabitation and shared custody of pets
In a judgment, the Court of First Instance in Rome establishes shared custody of the family pet in in the aftermath of an extra-marital cohabitation cessation and consequent partners’ disagreement on the issue.  The Court indicates rules of conduct for pet custody and maintenance.  Court’s decision grounds on the analogical application of the norms about custody of children and on the evaluation of the material, spiritual ad affective interest of the pet. The author highlights the remarkable court’s attempt in overcoming the traditional concept of pets conceived as res and, starting from this decision, indicates which perspectives the law can follow in this respect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Derecho Animal
Derecho Animal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relaciones de vecindad y tenencia de animales. Reapertura del recurso de protección en la propiedad horizontal chilena Análisis jurídico sobre la concurrencia del ensañamiento en el delito de maltrato animal Estrategias para fortalecer el capital social y su importancia en la solución del conflicto ser humano-fauna urbana en la ciudad de Ibarra, Ecuador Francesc Ristol y Eva Doménec. Terapia Asistida con Animales. Técnicas y Ejercicios para Intervenciones Asistidas con Perros (Barcelona, 2ª ed. 2015) 390p. Reflect on the Past or on the Present? The root cause of the difficulties in advancing animal protection in China. Review of Peter J. Li’s latest work: Animal Welfare in China, Culture, Politics and Crisis, Sydney University Press 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1