16岁以下儿童的法律行为能力、发育能力和心智能力受损:北爱尔兰的神经发育和法律

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101872
Phil Anderson , Gavin Davidson , Francess Doherty , Heather Hanna , Colin Harper , Gerry Lynch , Roy McClelland , Claire McKenna
{"title":"16岁以下儿童的法律行为能力、发育能力和心智能力受损:北爱尔兰的神经发育和法律","authors":"Phil Anderson ,&nbsp;Gavin Davidson ,&nbsp;Francess Doherty ,&nbsp;Heather Hanna ,&nbsp;Colin Harper ,&nbsp;Gerry Lynch ,&nbsp;Roy McClelland ,&nbsp;Claire McKenna","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When people of any age, despite all possible support being provided, are unable to make a necessary decision, then it is important to have a legal framework which promotes and protects their rights. There is ongoing debate about how this can be achieved, in a non-discriminatory way, for adults but it is also an important consideration for children and young people.</p><p>In Northern Ireland, the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016, when fully implemented will provide a non-discriminatory framework for those aged 16 and over. Arguably this addresses discrimination based on disability but continues to discriminate based on age. This article explores some of the possible ways the rights of those aged under 16 could be further promoted and protected.</p><p>These approaches may include: retaining the current combination of statute law but developing new guidance to inform practice for those aged under 16; codifying Gillick to clarify under what circumstances those aged under 16 can accept, and possibly also refuse, interventions; amend the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995 to provide a more comprehensive framework for health and welfare decision making; amend and extend the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016 to apply to those aged under 16; or develop a new law specifically focused on the emerging capacity of those aged under 16.</p><p>There are complex issues involved including how to consider emerging or developmental decision-making ability, and the role of those with parental responsibility, but the complexities involved should not prevent these issues being addressed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal capacity, developmental capacity, and impaired mental capacity in children under 16: Neurodevelopment and the law in Northern Ireland\",\"authors\":\"Phil Anderson ,&nbsp;Gavin Davidson ,&nbsp;Francess Doherty ,&nbsp;Heather Hanna ,&nbsp;Colin Harper ,&nbsp;Gerry Lynch ,&nbsp;Roy McClelland ,&nbsp;Claire McKenna\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>When people of any age, despite all possible support being provided, are unable to make a necessary decision, then it is important to have a legal framework which promotes and protects their rights. There is ongoing debate about how this can be achieved, in a non-discriminatory way, for adults but it is also an important consideration for children and young people.</p><p>In Northern Ireland, the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016, when fully implemented will provide a non-discriminatory framework for those aged 16 and over. Arguably this addresses discrimination based on disability but continues to discriminate based on age. This article explores some of the possible ways the rights of those aged under 16 could be further promoted and protected.</p><p>These approaches may include: retaining the current combination of statute law but developing new guidance to inform practice for those aged under 16; codifying Gillick to clarify under what circumstances those aged under 16 can accept, and possibly also refuse, interventions; amend the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995 to provide a more comprehensive framework for health and welfare decision making; amend and extend the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016 to apply to those aged under 16; or develop a new law specifically focused on the emerging capacity of those aged under 16.</p><p>There are complex issues involved including how to consider emerging or developmental decision-making ability, and the role of those with parental responsibility, but the complexities involved should not prevent these issues being addressed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000158\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当任何年龄的人,尽管提供了一切可能的支持,却无法作出必要的决定时,就必须有一个促进和保护他们权利的法律框架。关于如何以不歧视的方式为成年人实现这一目标,目前正在进行辩论,但这也是儿童和年轻人的一个重要考虑因素。在北爱尔兰,《2016年精神能力法(北爱尔兰)》全面实施后,将为16岁及以上的人提供一个非歧视的框架。可以说,这解决了基于残疾的歧视,但仍然是基于年龄的歧视。本文探讨了进一步促进和保护16岁以下儿童权利的一些可能方法。这些方法可能包括:保留目前的成文法组合,但制定新的指导方针,为16岁以下的人提供实践信息;修订吉利克法案,明确16岁以下的人在什么情况下可以接受,也可能拒绝干预;修订1995年《儿童(北爱尔兰)令》,为保健和福利决策提供更全面的框架;修订和扩大2016年《精神能力法(北爱尔兰)》,使其适用于16岁以下的人;或者制定一项新的法律,专门针对16岁以下青少年的新能力。这涉及到复杂的问题,包括如何考虑新兴或发展中的决策能力,以及承担父母责任的人的角色,但所涉及的复杂性不应阻止这些问题的解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legal capacity, developmental capacity, and impaired mental capacity in children under 16: Neurodevelopment and the law in Northern Ireland

When people of any age, despite all possible support being provided, are unable to make a necessary decision, then it is important to have a legal framework which promotes and protects their rights. There is ongoing debate about how this can be achieved, in a non-discriminatory way, for adults but it is also an important consideration for children and young people.

In Northern Ireland, the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016, when fully implemented will provide a non-discriminatory framework for those aged 16 and over. Arguably this addresses discrimination based on disability but continues to discriminate based on age. This article explores some of the possible ways the rights of those aged under 16 could be further promoted and protected.

These approaches may include: retaining the current combination of statute law but developing new guidance to inform practice for those aged under 16; codifying Gillick to clarify under what circumstances those aged under 16 can accept, and possibly also refuse, interventions; amend the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995 to provide a more comprehensive framework for health and welfare decision making; amend and extend the Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016 to apply to those aged under 16; or develop a new law specifically focused on the emerging capacity of those aged under 16.

There are complex issues involved including how to consider emerging or developmental decision-making ability, and the role of those with parental responsibility, but the complexities involved should not prevent these issues being addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Antisocial personality disorder and determinants among prisoners in South Gondar zone correctional institutions, Northwest Ethiopia: An institution-based cross-sectional study Editorial Board Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom Which diagnoses and arguments regarding severe mental disorder do forensic psychiatric experts in Sweden consider in different cases? A qualitative vignette study Legal consciousness of psychiatric patients in Israeli hospitals: Awareness and satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1