精神治疗:灵性对烧伤、伤口和重症护理影响的三重范围审查。

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE European burn journal Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI:10.3390/ebj3010016
Tomer Lagziel, Malik Muhammad Sohail, Harold G Koenig, Jeffrey E Janis, Stephen J Poteet, Kimberly H Khoo, Julie A Caffrey, Sheera F Lerman, Charles S Hultman
{"title":"精神治疗:灵性对烧伤、伤口和重症护理影响的三重范围审查。","authors":"Tomer Lagziel, Malik Muhammad Sohail, Harold G Koenig, Jeffrey E Janis, Stephen J Poteet, Kimberly H Khoo, Julie A Caffrey, Sheera F Lerman, Charles S Hultman","doi":"10.3390/ebj3010016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn patients are unique because their recovery requires prolonged hospital admissions, often complicated by a myriad of medical and surgical complications as well as psychological and emotional challenges. Religion and spirituality have been linked to improved health outcomes in other medical fields. Our scoping review aimed to examine the available literature for evidence of the impact of spirituality on burns, complex wounds, and critical care to shed more light on the relationship between spirituality and the conditions treated by multidisciplinary burn center teams. We performed three systematic reviews to examine the relationship between spirituality and these conditions. Searches were performed using MeSH terms utilizing four databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus). A systematic and independent title/abstract screening was carried out by two independent reviewers and a full-text review was followed. Our review demonstrated a clear lack of overlap between study outcomes and lack of objective spirituality measurements. Most articles primarily focused on psychological outcomes, such as stress or mental health, instead of objective measures such as wound size or scar formation. We found a trend toward better psychological outcomes in patients with more spirituality, either pre-existing or interventional. To increase comparability and uniformity of outcomes, future studies would benefit from utilizing standardized spiritual assessment tools and objective wound metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"188-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spiritual Healing: A Triple Scoping Review of the Impact of Spirituality on Burn Injuries, Wounds, and Critical Care.\",\"authors\":\"Tomer Lagziel, Malik Muhammad Sohail, Harold G Koenig, Jeffrey E Janis, Stephen J Poteet, Kimberly H Khoo, Julie A Caffrey, Sheera F Lerman, Charles S Hultman\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ebj3010016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Burn patients are unique because their recovery requires prolonged hospital admissions, often complicated by a myriad of medical and surgical complications as well as psychological and emotional challenges. Religion and spirituality have been linked to improved health outcomes in other medical fields. Our scoping review aimed to examine the available literature for evidence of the impact of spirituality on burns, complex wounds, and critical care to shed more light on the relationship between spirituality and the conditions treated by multidisciplinary burn center teams. We performed three systematic reviews to examine the relationship between spirituality and these conditions. Searches were performed using MeSH terms utilizing four databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus). A systematic and independent title/abstract screening was carried out by two independent reviewers and a full-text review was followed. Our review demonstrated a clear lack of overlap between study outcomes and lack of objective spirituality measurements. Most articles primarily focused on psychological outcomes, such as stress or mental health, instead of objective measures such as wound size or scar formation. We found a trend toward better psychological outcomes in patients with more spirituality, either pre-existing or interventional. To increase comparability and uniformity of outcomes, future studies would benefit from utilizing standardized spiritual assessment tools and objective wound metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European burn journal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"188-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European burn journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3010016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3010016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烧伤病人的情况比较特殊,因为他们的康复需要长期住院,而且往往会因各种内外科并发症以及心理和情感挑战而变得复杂。在其他医疗领域,宗教和灵性与改善健康状况息息相关。我们的范围界定综述旨在研究现有文献中有关灵性对烧伤、复杂伤口和重症监护影响的证据,以进一步阐明灵性与多学科烧伤中心团队所治疗的疾病之间的关系。我们进行了三篇系统性综述来研究灵性与这些病症之间的关系。我们使用 MeSH 术语在四个数据库(MEDLINE via PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science 和 Scopus)中进行了检索。两位独立审稿人对标题/摘要进行了系统、独立的筛选,随后进行了全文审阅。我们的综述显示,研究结果之间明显缺乏重叠,也缺乏客观的精神测量。大多数文章主要关注心理结果,如压力或心理健康,而不是伤口大小或疤痕形成等客观测量指标。我们发现,精神因素较多的患者,无论是原有精神因素还是介入性精神因素,心理结果都有改善的趋势。为了提高结果的可比性和统一性,未来的研究将受益于标准化的精神评估工具和客观的伤口指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spiritual Healing: A Triple Scoping Review of the Impact of Spirituality on Burn Injuries, Wounds, and Critical Care.

Burn patients are unique because their recovery requires prolonged hospital admissions, often complicated by a myriad of medical and surgical complications as well as psychological and emotional challenges. Religion and spirituality have been linked to improved health outcomes in other medical fields. Our scoping review aimed to examine the available literature for evidence of the impact of spirituality on burns, complex wounds, and critical care to shed more light on the relationship between spirituality and the conditions treated by multidisciplinary burn center teams. We performed three systematic reviews to examine the relationship between spirituality and these conditions. Searches were performed using MeSH terms utilizing four databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus). A systematic and independent title/abstract screening was carried out by two independent reviewers and a full-text review was followed. Our review demonstrated a clear lack of overlap between study outcomes and lack of objective spirituality measurements. Most articles primarily focused on psychological outcomes, such as stress or mental health, instead of objective measures such as wound size or scar formation. We found a trend toward better psychological outcomes in patients with more spirituality, either pre-existing or interventional. To increase comparability and uniformity of outcomes, future studies would benefit from utilizing standardized spiritual assessment tools and objective wound metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lost Work Due to Burn-Related Disability in a US Working Population. Development of Biofidelic Skin Simulants Based on Fresh Cadaveric Skin Tests. Bromelain in Burn Care: Advancements in Enzymatic Debridement and Patient Outcomes. 26 Years of Skin Banking in Finland. Life Satisfaction After Burn Injury-A Comprehensive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1