梁大挠度的一种比较方法

Y. Taghipour, Sara Darfarin
{"title":"梁大挠度的一种比较方法","authors":"Y. Taghipour, Sara Darfarin","doi":"10.2478/ijame-2022-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The deflection analysis of beams has been recently an active area of research. The large deflection of beams refers to deflections occurring due to large displacements and small strains. This type of deflection has been one of the areas of interest in the development of beam deformation methods. The wide diversity of beam deformation methods highlights the importance of their comparison to further elucidate the properties and features of each method and determine their benefits and limitations. In this study, a new comparison model is introduced which involves three steps, instead of only comparing final results for verification in common studies. In the first step, a complete comparison is made based on the assumptions and approximations of each method of the kinematics of deformation, displacement, and strain fields. After selecting the most accurate method in the first step, the displacement functions are determined by polynomial approximation under different loading and support conditions based on the selected method. In the third step, the displacement functions are used to calculate the strains in each method. The conclusion is based on comparing the strains. This comparative model can be used as a benchmark to compare different theories of deformation analysis.","PeriodicalId":37871,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering","volume":"39 1","pages":"179 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Method for Comparison of Large Deflection in Beams\",\"authors\":\"Y. Taghipour, Sara Darfarin\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ijame-2022-0058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The deflection analysis of beams has been recently an active area of research. The large deflection of beams refers to deflections occurring due to large displacements and small strains. This type of deflection has been one of the areas of interest in the development of beam deformation methods. The wide diversity of beam deformation methods highlights the importance of their comparison to further elucidate the properties and features of each method and determine their benefits and limitations. In this study, a new comparison model is introduced which involves three steps, instead of only comparing final results for verification in common studies. In the first step, a complete comparison is made based on the assumptions and approximations of each method of the kinematics of deformation, displacement, and strain fields. After selecting the most accurate method in the first step, the displacement functions are determined by polynomial approximation under different loading and support conditions based on the selected method. In the third step, the displacement functions are used to calculate the strains in each method. The conclusion is based on comparing the strains. This comparative model can be used as a benchmark to compare different theories of deformation analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijame-2022-0058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemical Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijame-2022-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要梁的挠度分析是近年来研究的一个活跃领域。梁的大挠度是指由于大位移和小应变而产生的挠度。这种类型的挠度一直是发展梁变形方法感兴趣的领域之一。梁变形方法的广泛多样性突出了它们的比较的重要性,以进一步阐明每种方法的性质和特征,并确定它们的优点和局限性。本文引入了一种新的比较模型,该模型分三步进行,而不是像一般的研究那样只对最终结果进行比较验证。在第一步中,基于变形场、位移场和应变场运动学的假设和近似,对每种方法进行了完整的比较。在第一步选择最精确的方法后,根据所选择的方法,通过多项式逼近确定不同荷载和支护条件下的位移函数。第三步,利用位移函数计算各方法的应变。这一结论是在对菌株进行比较的基础上得出的。该比较模型可作为比较不同变形分析理论的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Method for Comparison of Large Deflection in Beams
Abstract The deflection analysis of beams has been recently an active area of research. The large deflection of beams refers to deflections occurring due to large displacements and small strains. This type of deflection has been one of the areas of interest in the development of beam deformation methods. The wide diversity of beam deformation methods highlights the importance of their comparison to further elucidate the properties and features of each method and determine their benefits and limitations. In this study, a new comparison model is introduced which involves three steps, instead of only comparing final results for verification in common studies. In the first step, a complete comparison is made based on the assumptions and approximations of each method of the kinematics of deformation, displacement, and strain fields. After selecting the most accurate method in the first step, the displacement functions are determined by polynomial approximation under different loading and support conditions based on the selected method. In the third step, the displacement functions are used to calculate the strains in each method. The conclusion is based on comparing the strains. This comparative model can be used as a benchmark to compare different theories of deformation analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering
International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊介绍: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING is an archival journal which aims to publish high quality original papers. These should encompass the best fundamental and applied science with an emphasis on their application to the highest engineering practice. The scope includes all aspects of science and engineering which have relevance to: biomechanics, elasticity, plasticity, vibrations, mechanics of structures, mechatronics, plates & shells, magnetohydrodynamics, rheology, thermodynamics, tribology, fluid dynamics.
期刊最新文献
The detrimental effect of thermal exposure and thermophoresis on MHD flow with combined mass and heat transmission employing permeability Conjugate Mixed Convection of a Micropolar Fluid Over a Vertical Hollow Circular Cylinder chattering analysis of an electro-hydraulic backstepping velocity controller Effect of Angular Speed Variations on the Nonlinear Vibrations of a Rotational Spring-Mass System Entropy Generation Analysis OF Mhd Micropolar – Nanofluid Flow Over A Moved And Permeable Vertical Plate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1