书评:知识经济中的集体技能形成。朱利亚诺·波诺里和帕特里克·埃门egger编辑

IF 2.9 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR ILR Review Pub Date : 2023-02-26 DOI:10.1177/00197939231160449
Konstantin J. M. Peveling
{"title":"书评:知识经济中的集体技能形成。朱利亚诺·波诺里和帕特里克·埃门egger编辑","authors":"Konstantin J. M. Peveling","doi":"10.1177/00197939231160449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors are surprisingly optimistic, emphasizing the agency of bureaucrats and offering policy proposals at the end. These prescriptions, however, refer back to many of the difficulties of achieving social policy goals through procurement. For example, they call on unions and employer associations to be more involved in public procurement and to take advantage of the opportunities that exist for re-regulating work and improving some truly bad jobs. Unfortunately, German unions in most low-wage sectors have few members or resources to become involved in these complex administrative dynamics. The authors also call for innovative forms of enforcement, even though Germany already has some quite well-resourced enforcement entities (such as Finanzkontrolle Schwarzarbeit) that have faced severe documented difficulties monitoring standards in other low-wage sectors. They also recommend that municipalities consider insourcing, which would shift the task of social and ecological protection out of the market (i.e., the procurement function) and into the internal management of public-sector entities. Whether the public sector is willing and able to take up this task in Germany is a question beyond the scope of this book. Jaehrling and Stiehm show how public procurement professionals can become engaged in an institutional experiment for better work. But to what extent can the problems of lowwage work really be solved by managing the market better? Or in the context of German capitalism, with its strong tendencies toward marketization and liberalization, will social protection always be playing catch-up? Polanyi himself wrote that liberal economic order of 19thcentury Europe had been centrally planned, while social protection had come as an ad hoc response. In the 21st century this asymmetry is as important as ever.","PeriodicalId":13504,"journal":{"name":"ILR Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Reviews: Collective Skill Formation in the Knowledge Economy. Edited by Giuliano Bonoli and Patrick Emmenegger\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin J. M. Peveling\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00197939231160449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors are surprisingly optimistic, emphasizing the agency of bureaucrats and offering policy proposals at the end. These prescriptions, however, refer back to many of the difficulties of achieving social policy goals through procurement. For example, they call on unions and employer associations to be more involved in public procurement and to take advantage of the opportunities that exist for re-regulating work and improving some truly bad jobs. Unfortunately, German unions in most low-wage sectors have few members or resources to become involved in these complex administrative dynamics. The authors also call for innovative forms of enforcement, even though Germany already has some quite well-resourced enforcement entities (such as Finanzkontrolle Schwarzarbeit) that have faced severe documented difficulties monitoring standards in other low-wage sectors. They also recommend that municipalities consider insourcing, which would shift the task of social and ecological protection out of the market (i.e., the procurement function) and into the internal management of public-sector entities. Whether the public sector is willing and able to take up this task in Germany is a question beyond the scope of this book. Jaehrling and Stiehm show how public procurement professionals can become engaged in an institutional experiment for better work. But to what extent can the problems of lowwage work really be solved by managing the market better? Or in the context of German capitalism, with its strong tendencies toward marketization and liberalization, will social protection always be playing catch-up? Polanyi himself wrote that liberal economic order of 19thcentury Europe had been centrally planned, while social protection had come as an ad hoc response. In the 21st century this asymmetry is as important as ever.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ILR Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ILR Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939231160449\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ILR Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939231160449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两位作者出人意料地乐观,强调了官僚的作用,并在最后提出了政策建议。然而,这些处方又提到了通过采购实现社会政策目标的许多困难。例如,他们呼吁工会和雇主协会更多地参与公共采购,并利用现有的机会重新规范工作,改善一些真正糟糕的工作。不幸的是,德国大多数低工资行业的工会几乎没有成员或资源参与这些复杂的行政动态。作者还呼吁创新执法形式,尽管德国已经有一些资源相当充足的执法实体(如finanzcontrolle Schwarzarbeit),这些实体在其他低工资行业的标准监督方面面临严重的记录困难。他们还建议市政当局考虑内包,这将把社会和生态保护的任务从市场(即采购职能)转移到公共部门实体的内部管理。德国的公共部门是否愿意并且能够承担这一任务,已经超出了本书的讨论范围。Jaehrling和Stiehm展示了公共采购专业人员如何参与到一项制度性实验中,以获得更好的工作。但是,通过更好地管理市场,低工资工作的问题能在多大程度上真正得到解决?或者在市场化和自由化倾向强烈的德国资本主义背景下,社会保障是否总是在追赶?波兰尼自己写道,19世纪欧洲的自由经济秩序是中央计划的,而社会保护是一种临时应对措施。在21世纪,这种不对称与以往一样重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Reviews: Collective Skill Formation in the Knowledge Economy. Edited by Giuliano Bonoli and Patrick Emmenegger
The authors are surprisingly optimistic, emphasizing the agency of bureaucrats and offering policy proposals at the end. These prescriptions, however, refer back to many of the difficulties of achieving social policy goals through procurement. For example, they call on unions and employer associations to be more involved in public procurement and to take advantage of the opportunities that exist for re-regulating work and improving some truly bad jobs. Unfortunately, German unions in most low-wage sectors have few members or resources to become involved in these complex administrative dynamics. The authors also call for innovative forms of enforcement, even though Germany already has some quite well-resourced enforcement entities (such as Finanzkontrolle Schwarzarbeit) that have faced severe documented difficulties monitoring standards in other low-wage sectors. They also recommend that municipalities consider insourcing, which would shift the task of social and ecological protection out of the market (i.e., the procurement function) and into the internal management of public-sector entities. Whether the public sector is willing and able to take up this task in Germany is a question beyond the scope of this book. Jaehrling and Stiehm show how public procurement professionals can become engaged in an institutional experiment for better work. But to what extent can the problems of lowwage work really be solved by managing the market better? Or in the context of German capitalism, with its strong tendencies toward marketization and liberalization, will social protection always be playing catch-up? Polanyi himself wrote that liberal economic order of 19thcentury Europe had been centrally planned, while social protection had come as an ad hoc response. In the 21st century this asymmetry is as important as ever.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ILR Review
ILR Review INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Issued quarterly since October 1947, the Industrial and Labor Relations Review is a leading interdisciplinary journal publishing original research on all aspects of the employment relationship. The journal also publishes reviews of some 30 books per year. This site offers an index of all articles and book reviews published since 1947, abstracts of all articles, and information about upcoming issues. At the "All Articles" and "All Book Reviews" pages, visitors can search on titles and authors. Use this site, too, to learn about upcoming articles and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Variations of Freelancers’ “Effort-Bargain” Experiences in Platform Work: The Role of Skills The Europeanization of Wage Policy and Its Consequences for Labor Politics: The Case of Ireland The Changing Skill Content of Private-Sector Union Coverage The Economics of Immigration: A Festschrift in Honor of George J. Borjas Book Review: Investing in Innovation: Confronting Predatory Value Extraction in the U.S. Corporation. By William Lazonick
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1