非民主政治的平台化:2020年代白俄罗斯参与实验的空间

S. Liubimau
{"title":"非民主政治的平台化:2020年代白俄罗斯参与实验的空间","authors":"S. Liubimau","doi":"10.7494/human.2022.21.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper�s focus is on the innovations in the urban public political agenda that are due to the interplay between participatory digital platforms, the socio-economic paths of specific urban environments, and long-term policy orientations on the national and urban levels. The context of the 2020 presidential elections in Belarus and the resulting boom of participation in the local and national political agendas is taken here as a particular configuration of the mentioned interplay and its outcomes. The first part of the paper focuses on the role of digital platforms in the studied boom of participation in 2020, the second documents the urban policy developments in Belarus during the period of 2015�2020, and the third reflects on the compatibility of the Belarusian case with wider discussions on the political impact that the spread of digital platforms has on urbanism. It is argued that the repressive state, the gradual marketization of urban development and the accompanying strengthening of urban dwellers� economic autonomy, and the proliferation of commercial digital platforms and civic tech are the factors that have defined the studied politicization and the boom of participation in Belarus. The examined case shows the contours of emerging politics in non-democracies under conditions of ubiquitous digitalization and the pressure on the state�s redistributive capacities.","PeriodicalId":30309,"journal":{"name":"Studia Humanistyczne AGH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platformization of Politics in Non-democracies: Spaces of Participatory Experiments In Belarus in 2020S\",\"authors\":\"S. Liubimau\",\"doi\":\"10.7494/human.2022.21.4.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper�s focus is on the innovations in the urban public political agenda that are due to the interplay between participatory digital platforms, the socio-economic paths of specific urban environments, and long-term policy orientations on the national and urban levels. The context of the 2020 presidential elections in Belarus and the resulting boom of participation in the local and national political agendas is taken here as a particular configuration of the mentioned interplay and its outcomes. The first part of the paper focuses on the role of digital platforms in the studied boom of participation in 2020, the second documents the urban policy developments in Belarus during the period of 2015�2020, and the third reflects on the compatibility of the Belarusian case with wider discussions on the political impact that the spread of digital platforms has on urbanism. It is argued that the repressive state, the gradual marketization of urban development and the accompanying strengthening of urban dwellers� economic autonomy, and the proliferation of commercial digital platforms and civic tech are the factors that have defined the studied politicization and the boom of participation in Belarus. The examined case shows the contours of emerging politics in non-democracies under conditions of ubiquitous digitalization and the pressure on the state�s redistributive capacities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Humanistyczne AGH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Humanistyczne AGH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7494/human.2022.21.4.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Humanistyczne AGH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7494/human.2022.21.4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的重点是城市公共政治议程的创新,这是由于参与式数字平台、特定城市环境的社会经济路径以及国家和城市层面的长期政策取向之间的相互作用。2020年白俄罗斯总统选举的背景以及由此产生的参与地方和国家政治议程的热潮,在这里被视为上述相互作用及其结果的特殊配置。本文的第一部分侧重于数字平台在研究的2020年参与热潮中的作用,第二部分记录了白俄罗斯2015 - 2020年期间的城市政策发展,第三部分反映了白俄罗斯案例与更广泛的讨论的兼容性,即数字平台的传播对城市主义的政治影响。本文认为,压制性国家、城市发展的逐步市场化以及随之而来的城市居民经济自主权的加强,以及商业数字平台和公民技术的扩散,是定义白俄罗斯所研究的政治化和参与热潮的因素。所研究的案例显示了在无处不在的数字化条件下,非民主国家新兴政治的轮廓,以及对国家再分配能力的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Platformization of Politics in Non-democracies: Spaces of Participatory Experiments In Belarus in 2020S
This paper�s focus is on the innovations in the urban public political agenda that are due to the interplay between participatory digital platforms, the socio-economic paths of specific urban environments, and long-term policy orientations on the national and urban levels. The context of the 2020 presidential elections in Belarus and the resulting boom of participation in the local and national political agendas is taken here as a particular configuration of the mentioned interplay and its outcomes. The first part of the paper focuses on the role of digital platforms in the studied boom of participation in 2020, the second documents the urban policy developments in Belarus during the period of 2015�2020, and the third reflects on the compatibility of the Belarusian case with wider discussions on the political impact that the spread of digital platforms has on urbanism. It is argued that the repressive state, the gradual marketization of urban development and the accompanying strengthening of urban dwellers� economic autonomy, and the proliferation of commercial digital platforms and civic tech are the factors that have defined the studied politicization and the boom of participation in Belarus. The examined case shows the contours of emerging politics in non-democracies under conditions of ubiquitous digitalization and the pressure on the state�s redistributive capacities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Zr�wnowa�one konsumowanie czasu wolnego. O przemianach leisure time w spo�ecze�stwie konsumpcyjnym Od �czasu wolnego� do �czasu niewolnego�? Dylematy spo�ecze�stwa osi�gni�� Problematyczne u�ytkowanie Internetu w czasie wolnym przez m�odzie� w perspektywie psychologii uzale�nie� Czas wolny - o codziennych i niecodziennych scenariuszach do�wiadczania Pu�apka czy dobrodziejstwo immersyjno�ci w bieganiu d�ugodystansowym? Czas wolny aktywnie wype�niany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1