保守还是非保守策略促进繁殖?基于空间变异和竞争模型的benthamii桉的案例研究

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY Silvae Genetica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2478/sg-2023-0001
Marcio José de Araujo, Guilherme Nichele da Rocha, Regiane Abjaud Estopa, Javier Oberschelp, P. H. M. da Silva
{"title":"保守还是非保守策略促进繁殖?基于空间变异和竞争模型的benthamii桉的案例研究","authors":"Marcio José de Araujo, Guilherme Nichele da Rocha, Regiane Abjaud Estopa, Javier Oberschelp, P. H. M. da Silva","doi":"10.2478/sg-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The greatest challenge faced when breeding populations of forest species is to achieve the right equilibrium among genetic gain and no loss of the effective population size. Thus this study aims to define the best thinning strategy to compose a seed orchard of Eucalyptus benthamii to obtain genetic gain maintaining the effective population size. The population of E. benthamii studied consisted of 28 open-pollinated progenies. The diameter at breast height (DBH) and height (H) parameters were determined three years after planting. Measurement data were analyzed and compared using four different mathematical models (with and without competition effect and spatial variation). Strategies considering genetic gain and effective population size were simulated considering the number of families, the number of individuals between families, and the total number of individuals. The mathematical model accounting for the competition effect had the best fit for DBH whereas the model accounting for the environmental variation effect presented the best fit for H. The ranking of BLUPs grouped the families into three clusters (best, intermediate/average, worst/poor families). The strategy that maintains 40 % of the individuals, generates a genetic gain of 13 % in DBH and 8 % in total height while maintaining an effective population size greater than 92 for booth traits.","PeriodicalId":21834,"journal":{"name":"Silvae Genetica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservative or non-conservative strategy to advance breeding generation? A case study in Eucalyptus benthamii using spatial variation and competition model\",\"authors\":\"Marcio José de Araujo, Guilherme Nichele da Rocha, Regiane Abjaud Estopa, Javier Oberschelp, P. H. M. da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sg-2023-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The greatest challenge faced when breeding populations of forest species is to achieve the right equilibrium among genetic gain and no loss of the effective population size. Thus this study aims to define the best thinning strategy to compose a seed orchard of Eucalyptus benthamii to obtain genetic gain maintaining the effective population size. The population of E. benthamii studied consisted of 28 open-pollinated progenies. The diameter at breast height (DBH) and height (H) parameters were determined three years after planting. Measurement data were analyzed and compared using four different mathematical models (with and without competition effect and spatial variation). Strategies considering genetic gain and effective population size were simulated considering the number of families, the number of individuals between families, and the total number of individuals. The mathematical model accounting for the competition effect had the best fit for DBH whereas the model accounting for the environmental variation effect presented the best fit for H. The ranking of BLUPs grouped the families into three clusters (best, intermediate/average, worst/poor families). The strategy that maintains 40 % of the individuals, generates a genetic gain of 13 % in DBH and 8 % in total height while maintaining an effective population size greater than 92 for booth traits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Silvae Genetica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Silvae Genetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2023-0001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Silvae Genetica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2023-0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要森林物种种群繁殖面临的最大挑战是在遗传增益和有效种群大小的不损失之间取得适当的平衡。因此,本研究旨在确定最佳的间伐策略,以组成benthamii桉树种子园,以获得遗传增益,保持有效种群规模。研究的benthamii种群由28个开放授粉的后代组成。胸径(DBH)和高度(H)参数在种植3年后测定。采用四种不同的数学模型(有无竞争效应和空间变异)对测量数据进行分析和比较。考虑家族数、家族间个体数和总个体数,模拟考虑遗传增益和有效种群大小的策略。考虑竞争效应的数学模型对胸径的拟合效果最好,考虑环境变异效应的数学模型对胸径的拟合效果最好。blp的排名将家庭分为最佳、中等/平均、最差/贫困3类。该策略保持40%的个体,产生13%的胸径和8%的总高度遗传增益,同时保持有效种群规模大于92的摊位性状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conservative or non-conservative strategy to advance breeding generation? A case study in Eucalyptus benthamii using spatial variation and competition model
Abstract The greatest challenge faced when breeding populations of forest species is to achieve the right equilibrium among genetic gain and no loss of the effective population size. Thus this study aims to define the best thinning strategy to compose a seed orchard of Eucalyptus benthamii to obtain genetic gain maintaining the effective population size. The population of E. benthamii studied consisted of 28 open-pollinated progenies. The diameter at breast height (DBH) and height (H) parameters were determined three years after planting. Measurement data were analyzed and compared using four different mathematical models (with and without competition effect and spatial variation). Strategies considering genetic gain and effective population size were simulated considering the number of families, the number of individuals between families, and the total number of individuals. The mathematical model accounting for the competition effect had the best fit for DBH whereas the model accounting for the environmental variation effect presented the best fit for H. The ranking of BLUPs grouped the families into three clusters (best, intermediate/average, worst/poor families). The strategy that maintains 40 % of the individuals, generates a genetic gain of 13 % in DBH and 8 % in total height while maintaining an effective population size greater than 92 for booth traits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Silvae Genetica
Silvae Genetica 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Silvae Genetica is an international peer reviewed journal with more than 65 year tradition and experience in all fields of theoretical and applied Forest Genetics and Tree breeding. It continues "Zeitschrift für Forstgenetik und Forstpflanzenzüchtung" (Journal of Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding) founded by W. LANGNER in 1951.
期刊最新文献
Identification of superior hybrid clones for fibre biometry in Eucalyptus camaldulensis × E. tereticornis using multi trait stability index A Novel Set of Chloroplast SSR Markers for the Genus Juglans Reveals Within Species Differentiation An improved and effective DNA extraction protocol for Pyracantha crenulata with optimal PCR reliability Accuracy Evaluation of Visible-Near Infrared Spectroscopy for Detecting Insect Damage in Acorns of Quercus acuta High-molecular-weight DNA extraction for broadleaved and conifer tree species
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1