垫圈不影响内上髁骨折的植入物取出率或肘关节活动。

Neeraj M. Patel, Christopher R. Gajewski, Anthony M. Ascoli, J. Lawrence
{"title":"垫圈不影响内上髁骨折的植入物取出率或肘关节活动。","authors":"Neeraj M. Patel, Christopher R. Gajewski, Anthony M. Ascoli, J. Lawrence","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000000655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of a washer to supplement screw fixation can prevent fragmentation and penetration during the surgical treatment of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures. However, concerns may arise regarding screw prominence and the need for subsequent implant removal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of washer utilization on the need for hardware removal and elbow range of motion (ROM). All pediatric medial epicondyle fractures treated with a single screw over a 7-year period were queried for this retrospective case-control study. Hardware removal was performed only if the patient experienced a complication or implant-related symptoms that were refractory to non-operative management. Of the 137 patients included in the study, a washer was utilized in 90 (66%). Thirty-one patients (23%) ultimately underwent hardware removal. There was not an increased need for implant removal in those with a washer (P = 0.11). When analyzing a subgroup of 102 athletes only, there was similarly no difference in the rate of implant removal if a washer was used (P = 0.64). Overall, 107 (78%) patients regained full ROM at a mean of 13.9 ± 9.7 weeks after surgery with no significant difference along the lines of washer use. Use of a washer did not affect the need for subsequent implant removal or elbow ROM after fixation of medial epicondyle fractures, even in athletes. If there is concern for fracture fragmentation or penetration, a washer can be included without concern that future unplanned surgeries may be required.","PeriodicalId":16709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Washers do not affect the rate of implant removal or elbow motion in medial epicondyle fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Neeraj M. Patel, Christopher R. Gajewski, Anthony M. Ascoli, J. Lawrence\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000000655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of a washer to supplement screw fixation can prevent fragmentation and penetration during the surgical treatment of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures. However, concerns may arise regarding screw prominence and the need for subsequent implant removal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of washer utilization on the need for hardware removal and elbow range of motion (ROM). All pediatric medial epicondyle fractures treated with a single screw over a 7-year period were queried for this retrospective case-control study. Hardware removal was performed only if the patient experienced a complication or implant-related symptoms that were refractory to non-operative management. Of the 137 patients included in the study, a washer was utilized in 90 (66%). Thirty-one patients (23%) ultimately underwent hardware removal. There was not an increased need for implant removal in those with a washer (P = 0.11). When analyzing a subgroup of 102 athletes only, there was similarly no difference in the rate of implant removal if a washer was used (P = 0.64). Overall, 107 (78%) patients regained full ROM at a mean of 13.9 ± 9.7 weeks after surgery with no significant difference along the lines of washer use. Use of a washer did not affect the need for subsequent implant removal or elbow ROM after fixation of medial epicondyle fractures, even in athletes. If there is concern for fracture fragmentation or penetration, a washer can be included without concern that future unplanned surgeries may be required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在小儿内侧上髁骨折的手术治疗中,使用垫圈辅助螺钉固定可以防止骨折和穿透。然而,可能会出现螺钉突出和随后需要移除植入物的问题。本研究的目的是评估垫圈使用对硬体移除需求和肘关节活动范围(ROM)的影响。在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,我们对7年内所有接受单螺钉治疗的儿童内侧上髁骨折进行了调查。只有当患者出现并发症或植入物相关症状且非手术治疗难治性时,才进行硬体取出。在纳入研究的137例患者中,90例(66%)使用了洗衣机。31名患者(23%)最终接受了硬体移除手术。使用清洗器的患者对种植体移除的需求没有增加(P = 0.11)。当仅分析102名运动员的亚组时,如果使用垫圈,植入物移除率同样没有差异(P = 0.64)。总体而言,107例(78%)患者在手术后平均13.9±9.7周内恢复了完全的ROM,在使用垫圈方面没有显着差异。使用垫圈不影响内上髁骨折固定后的后续植入物取出或肘关节内固定,即使在运动员中也是如此。如果担心骨折碎片或穿透,可以使用垫圈,而不必担心将来可能需要进行计划外手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Washers do not affect the rate of implant removal or elbow motion in medial epicondyle fractures.
The use of a washer to supplement screw fixation can prevent fragmentation and penetration during the surgical treatment of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures. However, concerns may arise regarding screw prominence and the need for subsequent implant removal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of washer utilization on the need for hardware removal and elbow range of motion (ROM). All pediatric medial epicondyle fractures treated with a single screw over a 7-year period were queried for this retrospective case-control study. Hardware removal was performed only if the patient experienced a complication or implant-related symptoms that were refractory to non-operative management. Of the 137 patients included in the study, a washer was utilized in 90 (66%). Thirty-one patients (23%) ultimately underwent hardware removal. There was not an increased need for implant removal in those with a washer (P = 0.11). When analyzing a subgroup of 102 athletes only, there was similarly no difference in the rate of implant removal if a washer was used (P = 0.64). Overall, 107 (78%) patients regained full ROM at a mean of 13.9 ± 9.7 weeks after surgery with no significant difference along the lines of washer use. Use of a washer did not affect the need for subsequent implant removal or elbow ROM after fixation of medial epicondyle fractures, even in athletes. If there is concern for fracture fragmentation or penetration, a washer can be included without concern that future unplanned surgeries may be required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of risk factors for nonunion in pediatric lateral column lengthening’ by Torrez et al. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography, standard computed tomography, and plain radiographs in the evaluation of medial epicondyle humerus fractures Letter to the editor, concerning Cimen et al.: ‘Percutaneous release for trigger thumb in children under local anesthesia’ Referral patterns to a pediatric orthopedic clinic: pediatric orthopedic surgeons are primary care musculoskeletal medicine physicians Reliability and validity of Vancouver Scar Scale and Withey score after syndactyly release
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1