金融市场对制药行业研发波动的反应。一项多国研究

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Business Economics and Management Pub Date : 2022-11-25 DOI:10.3846/jbem.2022.17844
M. Mironiuc, M. Huian, Alina Țaran, Mihaela Curea
{"title":"金融市场对制药行业研发波动的反应。一项多国研究","authors":"M. Mironiuc, M. Huian, Alina Țaran, Mihaela Curea","doi":"10.3846/jbem.2022.17844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate management is often accused of short-term oriented behaviour related to R&D expenditures. This study analyses the influence of R&D volatility and R&D intensity on the market capitalization of pharmaceutical and medical research companies from Europe, considering the institutional context and several firm characteristics. Panel regression estimations on a sample of 217 companies for 2014–2019 indicate that R&D volatility adversely affects market value. The analysis is conducted on the entire sample and on sub-samples determined based on the positive and negative values of the R&D volatility. This differentiates between the continuous and the disrupting effect of R&D activities and the firm’s shift between exploratory and exploitative innovations. The positive volatility sub-sample provides consistent evidence of a significant negative influence of the R&D volatility on the market value. For the negative volatility sub-sample, R&D intensity and its interaction with R&D volatility have a significant positive effect, consistent over the alternative estimations. We conclude that the market influence of the R&D expenditure is related to the sign of volatility and depends on the proportion of R&D expenditure, especially when the volatility is negative. Our findings provide valuable insights for managers, investors, analysts, and other stakeholders about the market reaction to R&D volatility.","PeriodicalId":47594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Economics and Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FINANCIAL MARKET REACTION TO R&D VOLATILITY IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY. A MULTI-COUNTRY STUDY\",\"authors\":\"M. Mironiuc, M. Huian, Alina Țaran, Mihaela Curea\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/jbem.2022.17844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corporate management is often accused of short-term oriented behaviour related to R&D expenditures. This study analyses the influence of R&D volatility and R&D intensity on the market capitalization of pharmaceutical and medical research companies from Europe, considering the institutional context and several firm characteristics. Panel regression estimations on a sample of 217 companies for 2014–2019 indicate that R&D volatility adversely affects market value. The analysis is conducted on the entire sample and on sub-samples determined based on the positive and negative values of the R&D volatility. This differentiates between the continuous and the disrupting effect of R&D activities and the firm’s shift between exploratory and exploitative innovations. The positive volatility sub-sample provides consistent evidence of a significant negative influence of the R&D volatility on the market value. For the negative volatility sub-sample, R&D intensity and its interaction with R&D volatility have a significant positive effect, consistent over the alternative estimations. We conclude that the market influence of the R&D expenditure is related to the sign of volatility and depends on the proportion of R&D expenditure, especially when the volatility is negative. Our findings provide valuable insights for managers, investors, analysts, and other stakeholders about the market reaction to R&D volatility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Economics and Management\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Economics and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.17844\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.17844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业管理层经常被指责与研发支出有关的短期导向行为。本文在考虑制度背景和若干企业特征的情况下,分析了研发波动性和研发强度对欧洲制药和医学研究公司市值的影响。对2014-2019年217家公司样本的面板回归估计表明,研发波动性对市场价值产生不利影响。对整个样本和根据研发波动率的正负值确定的子样本进行分析。这区分了研发活动的持续效应和破坏效应,以及企业在探索性创新和剥削性创新之间的转变。正波动率子样本提供了研发波动率对市值显著负向影响的一致证据。对于负波动率子样本,研发强度及其与研发波动率的交互作用具有显著的正效应,与备选估计一致。研究发现,研发支出对市场的影响与波动性的符号有关,且取决于研发支出的比例,尤其是在波动性为负的情况下。我们的研究结果为管理者、投资者、分析师和其他利益相关者提供了有关市场对研发波动的反应的宝贵见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FINANCIAL MARKET REACTION TO R&D VOLATILITY IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY. A MULTI-COUNTRY STUDY
Corporate management is often accused of short-term oriented behaviour related to R&D expenditures. This study analyses the influence of R&D volatility and R&D intensity on the market capitalization of pharmaceutical and medical research companies from Europe, considering the institutional context and several firm characteristics. Panel regression estimations on a sample of 217 companies for 2014–2019 indicate that R&D volatility adversely affects market value. The analysis is conducted on the entire sample and on sub-samples determined based on the positive and negative values of the R&D volatility. This differentiates between the continuous and the disrupting effect of R&D activities and the firm’s shift between exploratory and exploitative innovations. The positive volatility sub-sample provides consistent evidence of a significant negative influence of the R&D volatility on the market value. For the negative volatility sub-sample, R&D intensity and its interaction with R&D volatility have a significant positive effect, consistent over the alternative estimations. We conclude that the market influence of the R&D expenditure is related to the sign of volatility and depends on the proportion of R&D expenditure, especially when the volatility is negative. Our findings provide valuable insights for managers, investors, analysts, and other stakeholders about the market reaction to R&D volatility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
48
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Economics and Management is a peer-reviewed journal which publishes original research papers. The objective of the journal is to provide insights into business and strategic management issues through the publication of high quality research from around the world. We particularly focus on research undertaken in Western Europe but welcome perspectives from other regions of the world that enhance our knowledge in this area. The journal publishes in the following areas of research: Global Business Transition Issues Economic Growth and Development Economics of Organizations and Industries Finance and Investment Strategic Management Marketing Innovations Public Administration.
期刊最新文献
BUSINESS RECOVERY AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS: EVIDENCE FROM VISEGRAD COUNTRIES AND SERBIA VARIETY OF SHOPPING MODES: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK, PIVOTAL FACTORS, AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS THE EFFECTS OF INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS IN GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN TRADE INNOVATION, COOPETITION AND SPILLOVER EFFECTS IN EUROPEAN REGIONS EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROFILES AND INTERGENERATIONAL COLLABORATION IN BUSINESS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1