中国企业的创新与学习能力

Wei Zhao, R. Arvanitis
{"title":"中国企业的创新与学习能力","authors":"Wei Zhao, R. Arvanitis","doi":"10.2753/CSA0009-4625420301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the example of the automobile and electronics sector in China, the article examines the technological learning of companies in China and the way it is influenced by industrial policy. Companies have consolidated their production capacity and technological learning but are rarely in a position to develop an innovation capability. The article shows the diversity of enterprises and identifies two opposing modes of development, either based on technological transfers of foreign technologies mainly through state-owned enterprises or based on assimilation and learning of technologies acquired through the clients in private or foreignowned companies or other new enterprises of a rather small size. The latter are less favored by official policies and have difficulty obtaining the advantages that may have been available through the national innovation system (training, higher education, research, technical centers, funding). This separation of the innovation system promoted by the government and the industrial system that was created through technological learning is, in the authors' opinion, the main reason for the low innovation capability of Chinese industry. The coexistence of these two different modes is a characteristic feature of China and explains why China does not follow the experience of South Korea and Japan using the path of \"imitation to innovation.\"","PeriodicalId":84447,"journal":{"name":"Chinese sociology and anthropology","volume":"4 1","pages":"27 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Innovation and Learning Capabilities of Chinese Firms\",\"authors\":\"Wei Zhao, R. Arvanitis\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/CSA0009-4625420301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the example of the automobile and electronics sector in China, the article examines the technological learning of companies in China and the way it is influenced by industrial policy. Companies have consolidated their production capacity and technological learning but are rarely in a position to develop an innovation capability. The article shows the diversity of enterprises and identifies two opposing modes of development, either based on technological transfers of foreign technologies mainly through state-owned enterprises or based on assimilation and learning of technologies acquired through the clients in private or foreignowned companies or other new enterprises of a rather small size. The latter are less favored by official policies and have difficulty obtaining the advantages that may have been available through the national innovation system (training, higher education, research, technical centers, funding). This separation of the innovation system promoted by the government and the industrial system that was created through technological learning is, in the authors' opinion, the main reason for the low innovation capability of Chinese industry. The coexistence of these two different modes is a characteristic feature of China and explains why China does not follow the experience of South Korea and Japan using the path of \\\"imitation to innovation.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":84447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese sociology and anthropology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese sociology and anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA0009-4625420301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese sociology and anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA0009-4625420301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文以中国汽车和电子行业为例,考察了中国企业的技术学习及其受产业政策影响的方式。公司已经巩固了他们的生产能力和技术学习,但很少有能力发展创新能力。文章显示了企业的多样性,并确定了两种相反的发展模式,要么是主要通过国有企业对外国技术进行技术转让,要么是通过私人或外国公司或其他规模较小的新企业对客户获得的技术进行同化和学习。后者不太受官方政策的青睐,难以获得通过国家创新系统(培训、高等教育、研究、技术中心、资金)可能获得的优势。这种由政府推动的创新体系与通过技术学习形成的产业体系的分离,是我国产业创新能力低下的主要原因。这两种不同模式的共存是中国的特色,也解释了为什么中国没有遵循韩国和日本的经验,走“模仿到创新”的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Innovation and Learning Capabilities of Chinese Firms
Based on the example of the automobile and electronics sector in China, the article examines the technological learning of companies in China and the way it is influenced by industrial policy. Companies have consolidated their production capacity and technological learning but are rarely in a position to develop an innovation capability. The article shows the diversity of enterprises and identifies two opposing modes of development, either based on technological transfers of foreign technologies mainly through state-owned enterprises or based on assimilation and learning of technologies acquired through the clients in private or foreignowned companies or other new enterprises of a rather small size. The latter are less favored by official policies and have difficulty obtaining the advantages that may have been available through the national innovation system (training, higher education, research, technical centers, funding). This separation of the innovation system promoted by the government and the industrial system that was created through technological learning is, in the authors' opinion, the main reason for the low innovation capability of Chinese industry. The coexistence of these two different modes is a characteristic feature of China and explains why China does not follow the experience of South Korea and Japan using the path of "imitation to innovation."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Development of the Ideology of Enlightenment in China (From the Seventeenth to the Early Nineteenth Century) Social Problems in Contemporary Chinese Society Why Young Women Are Shying Away from Jobs in Textile Mills The Inevitable Trend and Main Channels of the Transfer of China's Agricultural Labor Place Matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1