{"title":"无限晶格上静止弹道沉积的存在性","authors":"S. Chatterjee","doi":"10.1002/rsa.21116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ballistic deposition is one of the many models of interface growth that are believed to be in the KPZ universality class, but have so far proved to be largely intractable mathematically. In this model, blocks of size one fall independently as Poisson processes at each site on the d$$ d $$ ‐dimensional lattice, and either attach themselves to the column growing at that site, or to the side of an adjacent column, whichever comes first. It is not hard to see that if we subtract off the height of the column at the origin from the heights of the other columns, the resulting interface process is Markovian. The main result of this article is that this Markov process has at least one invariant probability measure. We conjecture that the invariant measure is not unique, and provide some partial evidence.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Existence of stationary ballistic deposition on the infinite lattice\",\"authors\":\"S. Chatterjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rsa.21116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ballistic deposition is one of the many models of interface growth that are believed to be in the KPZ universality class, but have so far proved to be largely intractable mathematically. In this model, blocks of size one fall independently as Poisson processes at each site on the d$$ d $$ ‐dimensional lattice, and either attach themselves to the column growing at that site, or to the side of an adjacent column, whichever comes first. It is not hard to see that if we subtract off the height of the column at the origin from the heights of the other columns, the resulting interface process is Markovian. The main result of this article is that this Markov process has at least one invariant probability measure. We conjecture that the invariant measure is not unique, and provide some partial evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.21116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rsa.21116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
弹道沉积是许多界面生长模型之一,被认为是在KPZ通用性类中,但迄今为止已被证明在数学上很大程度上难以解决。在这个模型中,大小为1的块在d $$ d $$维晶格上的每个位置上作为泊松过程独立落下,并且将自己附着在该位置生长的列上,或者附着在相邻列的一侧,以先到者为准。不难看出,如果我们从其他列的高度中减去原点处列的高度,则得到的界面过程是马尔可夫的。本文的主要结论是该马尔可夫过程至少有一个不变的概率测度。我们推测不变测度不是唯一的,并提供了部分证据。
Existence of stationary ballistic deposition on the infinite lattice
Ballistic deposition is one of the many models of interface growth that are believed to be in the KPZ universality class, but have so far proved to be largely intractable mathematically. In this model, blocks of size one fall independently as Poisson processes at each site on the d$$ d $$ ‐dimensional lattice, and either attach themselves to the column growing at that site, or to the side of an adjacent column, whichever comes first. It is not hard to see that if we subtract off the height of the column at the origin from the heights of the other columns, the resulting interface process is Markovian. The main result of this article is that this Markov process has at least one invariant probability measure. We conjecture that the invariant measure is not unique, and provide some partial evidence.