Jose Bohorquez-Rivero, E. García-Ballestas, Tariq Janjua, L. Moscote-Salazar
{"title":"COVID-19患者的自由与保守液体治疗:治疗危重患者的最佳策略是什么?","authors":"Jose Bohorquez-Rivero, E. García-Ballestas, Tariq Janjua, L. Moscote-Salazar","doi":"10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_1_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"fluid exudation causing pulmonary edema; this, in turn, leads to alveolar gas exchange disorders.[13] In this way, due to pulmonary edema in critical COVID‐19 patients, excessive fluid therapy and a positive fluid balance in COVID‐19 patients too could increase extravascular lung water due to pulmonary capillary leak and this affecting gas exchange, resulting in a worse prognosis;[14] therefore, according to this and in view of the benefit observed in other ARDS or sepsis populations, the consequences of a positive fluid balance, the possible reduction in the cost of administering less fluids, and the feasibility of the intervention, it has been suggested to use a conservative strategy over a liberal fluid therapy in critical patients with COVID‐19. This conservative approach could reduce the occurrence of a positive fluid balance while ensuring tissue perfusion.[7,9,14]","PeriodicalId":93326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine","volume":"61 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberal Versus Conservative Fluid Therapy in COVID-19 Patients: What is the Best Strategy for the Treatment of Critically ill Patients?\",\"authors\":\"Jose Bohorquez-Rivero, E. García-Ballestas, Tariq Janjua, L. Moscote-Salazar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_1_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"fluid exudation causing pulmonary edema; this, in turn, leads to alveolar gas exchange disorders.[13] In this way, due to pulmonary edema in critical COVID‐19 patients, excessive fluid therapy and a positive fluid balance in COVID‐19 patients too could increase extravascular lung water due to pulmonary capillary leak and this affecting gas exchange, resulting in a worse prognosis;[14] therefore, according to this and in view of the benefit observed in other ARDS or sepsis populations, the consequences of a positive fluid balance, the possible reduction in the cost of administering less fluids, and the feasibility of the intervention, it has been suggested to use a conservative strategy over a liberal fluid therapy in critical patients with COVID‐19. This conservative approach could reduce the occurrence of a positive fluid balance while ensuring tissue perfusion.[7,9,14]\",\"PeriodicalId\":93326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_1_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_1_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Liberal Versus Conservative Fluid Therapy in COVID-19 Patients: What is the Best Strategy for the Treatment of Critically ill Patients?
fluid exudation causing pulmonary edema; this, in turn, leads to alveolar gas exchange disorders.[13] In this way, due to pulmonary edema in critical COVID‐19 patients, excessive fluid therapy and a positive fluid balance in COVID‐19 patients too could increase extravascular lung water due to pulmonary capillary leak and this affecting gas exchange, resulting in a worse prognosis;[14] therefore, according to this and in view of the benefit observed in other ARDS or sepsis populations, the consequences of a positive fluid balance, the possible reduction in the cost of administering less fluids, and the feasibility of the intervention, it has been suggested to use a conservative strategy over a liberal fluid therapy in critical patients with COVID‐19. This conservative approach could reduce the occurrence of a positive fluid balance while ensuring tissue perfusion.[7,9,14]