回顾1912年左右的南非“黑色危险”:流行文化、群体认同和新的认识方式。

R. Levine
{"title":"回顾1912年左右的南非“黑色危险”:流行文化、群体认同和新的认识方式。","authors":"R. Levine","doi":"10.1080/17533171.2022.2094130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 1912, in a grand public spectacle, the majority of the white population of the Witwatersrand mobilized against perceived “outrages” on women and children committed by African men in either a consensual or non-consensual manner: the “Black Peril.” As a case study, this paper focuses on select popular culture sources generated by this particular “scare” as its evidentiary base. It builds on prior historiographical appeals to affect and emotion in understanding “Black Peril” scares. The paper reexamines the “Black Peril” by attending, first, to its discursive output and therein to embodied, affective, or emotional, and automatic, or unconscious, “ways of knowing.” Second, it reads this discourse alongside non-discursive, unconscious, or automatic, baseline understandings of race and segregation from which the outbursts sprang. The paper tentatively suggests the possibility of a group identity that was not primarily constituted against, or through, fear and anxiety (of Africans). Instead, it was made in a self-referential and self-witnessing manner, and was self-assured, perhaps even imperious.","PeriodicalId":43901,"journal":{"name":"Safundi-The Journal of South African and American Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"398 - 416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the ‘Black Peril,’ South Africa, circa 1912: Popular Culture, Group Identity, and New Ways of Knowing.\",\"authors\":\"R. Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17533171.2022.2094130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In 1912, in a grand public spectacle, the majority of the white population of the Witwatersrand mobilized against perceived “outrages” on women and children committed by African men in either a consensual or non-consensual manner: the “Black Peril.” As a case study, this paper focuses on select popular culture sources generated by this particular “scare” as its evidentiary base. It builds on prior historiographical appeals to affect and emotion in understanding “Black Peril” scares. The paper reexamines the “Black Peril” by attending, first, to its discursive output and therein to embodied, affective, or emotional, and automatic, or unconscious, “ways of knowing.” Second, it reads this discourse alongside non-discursive, unconscious, or automatic, baseline understandings of race and segregation from which the outbursts sprang. The paper tentatively suggests the possibility of a group identity that was not primarily constituted against, or through, fear and anxiety (of Africans). Instead, it was made in a self-referential and self-witnessing manner, and was self-assured, perhaps even imperious.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safundi-The Journal of South African and American Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"398 - 416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safundi-The Journal of South African and American Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17533171.2022.2094130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safundi-The Journal of South African and American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17533171.2022.2094130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1912年,在一场盛大的公共场面中,威特沃特斯兰德的大多数白人以自愿或非自愿的方式,动员起来反对非洲男人对妇女和儿童的“暴行”:“黑祸”。作为个案研究,本文重点选择了由这种特殊的“恐慌”产生的流行文化来源作为证据基础。它建立在先前的史学对情感和情感的呼吁上,以理解“黑色危险”的恐慌。本文通过关注“黑色危险”的话语输出,以及其中体现的、情感的或情感的、自动的或无意识的“认识方式”,重新审视了“黑色危险”。其次,它将这种话语与非话语的、无意识的或自动的、对种族和种族隔离的基本理解一起阅读,而这些理解正是爆发的来源。这篇论文试探性地提出了一种群体认同的可能性,这种群体认同不是主要针对或通过(非洲人的)恐惧和焦虑而构成的。相反,它是以一种自我参照和自我见证的方式制作的,而且很自信,甚至可能是专横的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting the ‘Black Peril,’ South Africa, circa 1912: Popular Culture, Group Identity, and New Ways of Knowing.
Abstract In 1912, in a grand public spectacle, the majority of the white population of the Witwatersrand mobilized against perceived “outrages” on women and children committed by African men in either a consensual or non-consensual manner: the “Black Peril.” As a case study, this paper focuses on select popular culture sources generated by this particular “scare” as its evidentiary base. It builds on prior historiographical appeals to affect and emotion in understanding “Black Peril” scares. The paper reexamines the “Black Peril” by attending, first, to its discursive output and therein to embodied, affective, or emotional, and automatic, or unconscious, “ways of knowing.” Second, it reads this discourse alongside non-discursive, unconscious, or automatic, baseline understandings of race and segregation from which the outbursts sprang. The paper tentatively suggests the possibility of a group identity that was not primarily constituted against, or through, fear and anxiety (of Africans). Instead, it was made in a self-referential and self-witnessing manner, and was self-assured, perhaps even imperious.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New mythologies: violence and colonialism in Hollywood blockbusters Imagining Africa: Black Panther: Wakanda Forever vs. The Woman King African literature of ideas and the prospect of collective individualism On the “wrong” side of history: fabulating history in the Woman King (2022) Staying with the crisis: a review of Eve Fairbanks’s The Inheritors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1