驯服魔鬼:评估匿名网络数据的技术

Scott E. Coull, C. V. Wright, A. Keromytis, F. Monrose, M. Reiter
{"title":"驯服魔鬼:评估匿名网络数据的技术","authors":"Scott E. Coull, C. V. Wright, A. Keromytis, F. Monrose, M. Reiter","doi":"10.7916/D8BC47W0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anonymization plays a key role in enabling the public release of network datasets, and yet there are few, if any, techniques for evaluating the efficacy of network data anonymization techniques with respect to the privacy they afford. In fact, recent work suggests that many state-of-the-art anonymization techniques may leak more information than first thought. In this paper, we propose techniques for evaluating the anonymity of network data. Specifically, we simulate the behavior of an adversary whose goal is to deanonymize objects, such as hosts or web pages, within the network data. By doing so, we are able to quantify the anonymity of the data using information theoretic metrics, objectively compare the efficacy of anonymization techniques, and examine the impact of selective deanonymization on the anonymity of the data. Moreover, we provide several concrete applications of our approach on real network data in the hope of underscoring its usefulness to data","PeriodicalId":20444,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taming the Devil: Techniques for Evaluating Anonymized Network Data\",\"authors\":\"Scott E. Coull, C. V. Wright, A. Keromytis, F. Monrose, M. Reiter\",\"doi\":\"10.7916/D8BC47W0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anonymization plays a key role in enabling the public release of network datasets, and yet there are few, if any, techniques for evaluating the efficacy of network data anonymization techniques with respect to the privacy they afford. In fact, recent work suggests that many state-of-the-art anonymization techniques may leak more information than first thought. In this paper, we propose techniques for evaluating the anonymity of network data. Specifically, we simulate the behavior of an adversary whose goal is to deanonymize objects, such as hosts or web pages, within the network data. By doing so, we are able to quantify the anonymity of the data using information theoretic metrics, objectively compare the efficacy of anonymization techniques, and examine the impact of selective deanonymization on the anonymity of the data. Moreover, we provide several concrete applications of our approach on real network data in the hope of underscoring its usefulness to data\",\"PeriodicalId\":20444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"59\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8BC47W0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8BC47W0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

摘要

匿名化在网络数据集的公开发布中起着关键作用,然而,很少(如果有的话)有技术来评估网络数据匿名化技术在隐私方面的有效性。事实上,最近的研究表明,许多最先进的匿名化技术可能会泄露比最初想象的更多的信息。在本文中,我们提出了评估网络数据匿名性的技术。具体来说,我们模拟对手的行为,其目标是使网络数据中的对象(如主机或网页)去匿名化。通过这样做,我们能够使用信息理论度量来量化数据的匿名性,客观地比较匿名化技术的有效性,并检查选择性去匿名化对数据匿名性的影响。此外,我们提供了我们的方法在真实网络数据上的几个具体应用,希望强调它对数据的有用性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taming the Devil: Techniques for Evaluating Anonymized Network Data
Anonymization plays a key role in enabling the public release of network datasets, and yet there are few, if any, techniques for evaluating the efficacy of network data anonymization techniques with respect to the privacy they afford. In fact, recent work suggests that many state-of-the-art anonymization techniques may leak more information than first thought. In this paper, we propose techniques for evaluating the anonymity of network data. Specifically, we simulate the behavior of an adversary whose goal is to deanonymize objects, such as hosts or web pages, within the network data. By doing so, we are able to quantify the anonymity of the data using information theoretic metrics, objectively compare the efficacy of anonymization techniques, and examine the impact of selective deanonymization on the anonymity of the data. Moreover, we provide several concrete applications of our approach on real network data in the hope of underscoring its usefulness to data
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Network and System Security: 17th International Conference, NSS 2023, Canterbury, UK, August 14–16, 2023, Proceedings Network and System Security: 16th International Conference, NSS 2022, Denarau Island, Fiji, December 9–12, 2022, Proceedings Network and System Security: 15th International Conference, NSS 2021, Tianjin, China, October 23, 2021, Proceedings Network and System Security: 14th International Conference, NSS 2020, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, November 25–27, 2020, Proceedings Neuro-Symbolic Execution: Augmenting Symbolic Execution with Neural Constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1