分组会议3:事件驱动架构和复杂事件处理

O. Etzion, M. Chandy, R. V. Ammon, R. Schulte
{"title":"分组会议3:事件驱动架构和复杂事件处理","authors":"O. Etzion, M. Chandy, R. V. Ammon, R. Schulte","doi":"10.1109/ICWS.2006.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are different and conflicting views made by analysts and some vendors about the relative positioning of SOA and EDA. The panel is intended to investigate the relative positioning and determine pros and cons for a unified SOA-EDA solution. The panel questions will concentrate on: (1) what is the difference between the service-oriented approach to the event-oriented approach? (2) What are common between the two approaches? (3) Is combination of the two (\"SOA 2.0\") makes sense. (4) What are its value add to customers?","PeriodicalId":73287,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Web Services : proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Web Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Panel Session 3: Event-Driven Architectures and Complex Event Processing\",\"authors\":\"O. Etzion, M. Chandy, R. V. Ammon, R. Schulte\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICWS.2006.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are different and conflicting views made by analysts and some vendors about the relative positioning of SOA and EDA. The panel is intended to investigate the relative positioning and determine pros and cons for a unified SOA-EDA solution. The panel questions will concentrate on: (1) what is the difference between the service-oriented approach to the event-oriented approach? (2) What are common between the two approaches? (3) Is combination of the two (\\\"SOA 2.0\\\") makes sense. (4) What are its value add to customers?\",\"PeriodicalId\":73287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Web Services : proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Web Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Web Services : proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Web Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2006.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Web Services : proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Web Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2006.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于SOA和EDA的相对定位,分析师和一些供应商提出了不同的、相互冲突的观点。该小组旨在调查相对定位,并确定统一SOA-EDA解决方案的优缺点。小组问题将集中于:(1)面向服务的方法与面向事件的方法之间的区别是什么?(2)这两种方法的共同点是什么?(3)两者的结合(“SOA 2.0”)有意义吗?(4)对客户的增值是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Panel Session 3: Event-Driven Architectures and Complex Event Processing
There are different and conflicting views made by analysts and some vendors about the relative positioning of SOA and EDA. The panel is intended to investigate the relative positioning and determine pros and cons for a unified SOA-EDA solution. The panel questions will concentrate on: (1) what is the difference between the service-oriented approach to the event-oriented approach? (2) What are common between the two approaches? (3) Is combination of the two ("SOA 2.0") makes sense. (4) What are its value add to customers?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Integrated Framework for Fault Resolution in Business Processes. A Novel Outlier-Tolerable and Predictive Approach to Web Service Composition Towards an Improved Bi-GAN-Based End-to-End One-Class Classifier for Anomaly Detection in Cloud Data-Centers Sequential Recommendation Based on Pairs of Interest and Graph Structure FRSM: A Novel Fault-Tolerant Approach for Redundant-Path-Enabled Service Migration in Mobile Edge Computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1