质量改进捆绑包对儿童院内心脏骤停抢救指南依从性的影响。

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-03-09 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/6875754
Pranali Awadhare, Karma Barot, Ingrid Frydson, Niveditha Balakumar, Donna Doerr, Utpal Bhalala
{"title":"质量改进捆绑包对儿童院内心脏骤停抢救指南依从性的影响。","authors":"Pranali Awadhare, Karma Barot, Ingrid Frydson, Niveditha Balakumar, Donna Doerr, Utpal Bhalala","doi":"10.1155/2023/6875754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Various quality improvement (QI) interventions have been individually assessed for the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We aimed to assess the QI bundle (hands-on training and debriefing) for the quality of CPR in our children's hospital. We hypothesized that the QI bundle improves the quality of CPR in hospitalized children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We initiated a QI bundle (hands-on training and debriefing) in August 2017. We conducted a before-after analysis comparing the CPR quality during July 2013-May 2017 (before) and January 2018-December 2020 (after). We collected data from the critical events logbook on CPR duration, chest compressions (CC) rate, ventilation rate (VR), the timing of first dose of epinephrine, blood pressure (BP), end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (EtCO<sub>2</sub>), and vital signs monitoring during CPR. We performed univariate analysis and presented data as the median interquartile range (IQR) and in percentage as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared data from 58 CPR events versus 41 CPR events before and after QI bundle implementation, respectively. The median (IQR) CPR duration for the pre- and post-QI bundle was 5 (1-13) minutes and 3 minutes (1.25-10), and the timing of the first dose of epinephrine was 2 (1-2) minutes and 2 minutes (1-5), respectively. We observed an improvement in compliance with the CC rate (100-120 per minute) from 72% events before versus 100% events after QI bundle implementation (<i>p</i>=0.0009). Similarly, there was a decrease in CC interruptions and hyperventilation rates from 100% to 50% (<i>p</i>=0.016) and 100% vs. 63% (<i>p</i>=<0.0001) events before vs. after QI bundle implementation, respectively. We also observed improvement in BP monitoring from 36% before versus 60% after QI bundle (<i>p</i>=0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our QI bundle (hands-on training and debriefing) was associated with improved compliance with high-quality CPR in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2023 ","pages":"6875754"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Quality Improvement Bundle on Compliance with Resuscitation Guidelines during In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children.\",\"authors\":\"Pranali Awadhare, Karma Barot, Ingrid Frydson, Niveditha Balakumar, Donna Doerr, Utpal Bhalala\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/6875754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Various quality improvement (QI) interventions have been individually assessed for the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We aimed to assess the QI bundle (hands-on training and debriefing) for the quality of CPR in our children's hospital. We hypothesized that the QI bundle improves the quality of CPR in hospitalized children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We initiated a QI bundle (hands-on training and debriefing) in August 2017. We conducted a before-after analysis comparing the CPR quality during July 2013-May 2017 (before) and January 2018-December 2020 (after). We collected data from the critical events logbook on CPR duration, chest compressions (CC) rate, ventilation rate (VR), the timing of first dose of epinephrine, blood pressure (BP), end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (EtCO<sub>2</sub>), and vital signs monitoring during CPR. We performed univariate analysis and presented data as the median interquartile range (IQR) and in percentage as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared data from 58 CPR events versus 41 CPR events before and after QI bundle implementation, respectively. The median (IQR) CPR duration for the pre- and post-QI bundle was 5 (1-13) minutes and 3 minutes (1.25-10), and the timing of the first dose of epinephrine was 2 (1-2) minutes and 2 minutes (1-5), respectively. We observed an improvement in compliance with the CC rate (100-120 per minute) from 72% events before versus 100% events after QI bundle implementation (<i>p</i>=0.0009). Similarly, there was a decrease in CC interruptions and hyperventilation rates from 100% to 50% (<i>p</i>=0.016) and 100% vs. 63% (<i>p</i>=<0.0001) events before vs. after QI bundle implementation, respectively. We also observed improvement in BP monitoring from 36% before versus 60% after QI bundle (<i>p</i>=0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our QI bundle (hands-on training and debriefing) was associated with improved compliance with high-quality CPR in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"6875754\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6875754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6875754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:针对心肺复苏(CPR)质量的各种质量改进(QI)干预措施已被单独评估。我们的目的是评估 QI 束(实践培训和汇报)对儿童医院心肺复苏术质量的影响。我们假设 QI 套件能提高住院儿童心肺复苏术的质量:我们于 2017 年 8 月启动了 QI 捆绑项目(实践培训和汇报)。我们对 2013 年 7 月至 2017 年 5 月(之前)和 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月(之后)的心肺复苏质量进行了前后分析比较。我们从危急事件日志中收集了心肺复苏持续时间、胸外按压(CC)率、通气率(VR)、首次注射肾上腺素的时间、血压(BP)、潮气末二氧化碳(EtCO2)以及心肺复苏过程中生命体征监测的数据。我们进行了单变量分析,并根据情况以中位数四分位数间距(IQR)和百分比表示数据:我们对实施 QI 套件前后分别发生的 58 起心肺复苏事件和 41 起心肺复苏事件的数据进行了比较。实施 QI 套件前后心肺复苏持续时间的中位数(IQR)分别为 5 (1-13) 分钟和 3 分钟 (1.25-10),肾上腺素首次给药时间分别为 2 (1-2) 分钟和 2 分钟 (1-5)。我们观察到,实施 QI 套件之前,CC 率(每分钟 100-120 次)的达标率为 72%,而实施后则为 100%(P=0.0009)。同样,CC中断率和过度通气率也从100%降至50%(P=0.016)和100%对63%(P=P=0.014):结论:我们的 QI 套件(实践培训和汇报)与提高儿童对高质量心肺复苏术的依从性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Quality Improvement Bundle on Compliance with Resuscitation Guidelines during In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children.

Introduction: Various quality improvement (QI) interventions have been individually assessed for the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We aimed to assess the QI bundle (hands-on training and debriefing) for the quality of CPR in our children's hospital. We hypothesized that the QI bundle improves the quality of CPR in hospitalized children.

Methods: We initiated a QI bundle (hands-on training and debriefing) in August 2017. We conducted a before-after analysis comparing the CPR quality during July 2013-May 2017 (before) and January 2018-December 2020 (after). We collected data from the critical events logbook on CPR duration, chest compressions (CC) rate, ventilation rate (VR), the timing of first dose of epinephrine, blood pressure (BP), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), and vital signs monitoring during CPR. We performed univariate analysis and presented data as the median interquartile range (IQR) and in percentage as appropriate.

Results: We compared data from 58 CPR events versus 41 CPR events before and after QI bundle implementation, respectively. The median (IQR) CPR duration for the pre- and post-QI bundle was 5 (1-13) minutes and 3 minutes (1.25-10), and the timing of the first dose of epinephrine was 2 (1-2) minutes and 2 minutes (1-5), respectively. We observed an improvement in compliance with the CC rate (100-120 per minute) from 72% events before versus 100% events after QI bundle implementation (p=0.0009). Similarly, there was a decrease in CC interruptions and hyperventilation rates from 100% to 50% (p=0.016) and 100% vs. 63% (p=<0.0001) events before vs. after QI bundle implementation, respectively. We also observed improvement in BP monitoring from 36% before versus 60% after QI bundle (p=0.014).

Conclusion: Our QI bundle (hands-on training and debriefing) was associated with improved compliance with high-quality CPR in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Hemodynamic Management and Postoperative Outcomes After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Prospective Observational Study. Efficacy of COVID-19 Treatments in Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Assessment of Satisfaction Levels Among Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Serum Concentration at 24 h With Intensive Beta-Lactam Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study: Beta-Lactam Blood Levels in Sepsis. Assessing the Impact of Simulation-Based Learning on Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Critical Care Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1