LB053:基于ngs的液体活检基因分型在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的临床评价

Hillary S Sloane, P. Sathyanarayan, D. Edelstein, F. Jones, J. Preston, Sam Wu, Jenna G. Los, Lara Duchstein, J. Fredebohm, K. Wichner, D. Heim, F. Holtrup, H. Quinn, D. Feller-Kopman
{"title":"LB053:基于ngs的液体活检基因分型在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的临床评价","authors":"Hillary S Sloane, P. Sathyanarayan, D. Edelstein, F. Jones, J. Preston, Sam Wu, Jenna G. Los, Lara Duchstein, J. Fredebohm, K. Wichner, D. Heim, F. Holtrup, H. Quinn, D. Feller-Kopman","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-LB053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Access to molecular testing for metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) patients has been improved by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) based liquid biopsies (LB), which can obviate invasive procedures, expedite results, and enable serial testing. Emerging clinical applications for LB include therapeutic efficacy monitoring and minimal residual disease (MRD) detection, which demand a ctDNA assay with high sensitivity, specificity, and appropriate genomic coverage. Here we demonstrate that SafeSEQ next-generation sequencing (NGS) LB delivers equivalent performance to OncoBEAM digital PCR, a sensitive ctDNA approach that has been extensively clinically validated in pivotal trials (e.g., AURA, TIGER-X). Importantly, SafeSEQ delivers significantly expanded genomic coverage to address the need for expanding targeted therapy indications, monitoring treatment response, and detecting MRD. Methods: Whole blood samples (n=176) were collected from mNSCLC patients prior to/during treatment or at disease progression and transported to a CLIA laboratory for OncoBEAM analysis to detect mutations in EGFR (exon 19 del, L858R, T790M, C797S), KRAS (codons 12, 13, 61) and BRAF V600E. Replicate plasma aliquots were analyzed with SafeSEQ to interrogate clinically relevant regions in BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, MET, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53. Mutation level concordance between the methods was assessed, where only genomic alterations interrogated by both platforms were considered. For mutations detected by both methods, correlation analysis of mutant allelic frequency (MAF) was performed. Results: Concordance analysis of the mutation results from OncoBEAM and SafeSEQ testing of 176 replicate patient samples demonstrated an overall percent agreement (OPA) of 99.6%, with a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 78.1% and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 99.9%. The mean MAF for discordant mutations (n=16) was 0.06% (range: 0.04-0.12%). When considering mutations with MAF >0.1%, PPA and OPA increased to 96.0% and 99.9%, respectively. MAF levels for mutations detected by both methods demonstrated a strong linear correlation (R2=0.98). Of 124 patient samples having no mutation detected by OncoBEAM, 75 (60%) showed ≥1 alteration with SafeSEQ. Panel-wide, 76% and 30% of all mutations were detected at Citation Format: Hillary Sloane, Priya Sathyanarayan, Daniel Edelstein, Frederick Jones, Jennifer Preston, Sam Wu, Jenna Los, Lara Duchstein, Johannes Fredebohm, Katharina Wichner, Denise Heim, Frank Holtrup, Hannah Quinn, David Feller-Kopman. Clinical evaluation of NGS-based liquid biopsy genotyping in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB053.","PeriodicalId":10518,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research (Excluding Clinical Trials)","volume":"51 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract LB053: Clinical evaluation of NGS-based liquid biopsy genotyping in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients\",\"authors\":\"Hillary S Sloane, P. Sathyanarayan, D. Edelstein, F. Jones, J. Preston, Sam Wu, Jenna G. Los, Lara Duchstein, J. Fredebohm, K. Wichner, D. Heim, F. Holtrup, H. Quinn, D. Feller-Kopman\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-LB053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Access to molecular testing for metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) patients has been improved by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) based liquid biopsies (LB), which can obviate invasive procedures, expedite results, and enable serial testing. Emerging clinical applications for LB include therapeutic efficacy monitoring and minimal residual disease (MRD) detection, which demand a ctDNA assay with high sensitivity, specificity, and appropriate genomic coverage. Here we demonstrate that SafeSEQ next-generation sequencing (NGS) LB delivers equivalent performance to OncoBEAM digital PCR, a sensitive ctDNA approach that has been extensively clinically validated in pivotal trials (e.g., AURA, TIGER-X). Importantly, SafeSEQ delivers significantly expanded genomic coverage to address the need for expanding targeted therapy indications, monitoring treatment response, and detecting MRD. Methods: Whole blood samples (n=176) were collected from mNSCLC patients prior to/during treatment or at disease progression and transported to a CLIA laboratory for OncoBEAM analysis to detect mutations in EGFR (exon 19 del, L858R, T790M, C797S), KRAS (codons 12, 13, 61) and BRAF V600E. Replicate plasma aliquots were analyzed with SafeSEQ to interrogate clinically relevant regions in BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, MET, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53. Mutation level concordance between the methods was assessed, where only genomic alterations interrogated by both platforms were considered. For mutations detected by both methods, correlation analysis of mutant allelic frequency (MAF) was performed. Results: Concordance analysis of the mutation results from OncoBEAM and SafeSEQ testing of 176 replicate patient samples demonstrated an overall percent agreement (OPA) of 99.6%, with a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 78.1% and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 99.9%. The mean MAF for discordant mutations (n=16) was 0.06% (range: 0.04-0.12%). When considering mutations with MAF >0.1%, PPA and OPA increased to 96.0% and 99.9%, respectively. MAF levels for mutations detected by both methods demonstrated a strong linear correlation (R2=0.98). Of 124 patient samples having no mutation detected by OncoBEAM, 75 (60%) showed ≥1 alteration with SafeSEQ. Panel-wide, 76% and 30% of all mutations were detected at Citation Format: Hillary Sloane, Priya Sathyanarayan, Daniel Edelstein, Frederick Jones, Jennifer Preston, Sam Wu, Jenna Los, Lara Duchstein, Johannes Fredebohm, Katharina Wichner, Denise Heim, Frank Holtrup, Hannah Quinn, David Feller-Kopman. Clinical evaluation of NGS-based liquid biopsy genotyping in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB053.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research (Excluding Clinical Trials)\",\"volume\":\"51 48\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research (Excluding Clinical Trials)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-LB053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research (Excluding Clinical Trials)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-LB053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:基于循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)的液体活检(LB)改善了转移性非小细胞肺癌(mNSCLC)患者的分子检测,这可以避免侵入性手术,加快结果,并实现系列检测。LB的新兴临床应用包括治疗效果监测和最小残留病(MRD)检测,这需要具有高灵敏度、特异性和适当基因组覆盖的ctDNA检测。在这里,我们证明SafeSEQ下一代测序(NGS) LB具有与OncoBEAM数字PCR相同的性能,OncoBEAM是一种敏感的ctDNA方法,已在关键试验(例如AURA, TIGER-X)中得到广泛的临床验证。重要的是,SafeSEQ提供了显著扩大的基因组覆盖范围,以满足扩大靶向治疗适应症、监测治疗反应和检测MRD的需求。方法:收集mNSCLC患者在治疗前/治疗期间或疾病进展时的全血样本(n=176),并将其运送到CLIA实验室进行OncoBEAM分析,以检测EGFR(外显子19 del, L858R, T790M, C797S), KRAS(密码子12,13,61)和BRAF V600E的突变。使用SafeSEQ分析重复血浆等分,询问BRAF、EGFR、ERBB2、KRAS、MET、NRAS、PIK3CA和TP53的临床相关区域。评估了两种方法之间的突变水平一致性,其中只考虑了两个平台所询问的基因组改变。对于两种方法检测到的突变,进行突变等位基因频率(MAF)的相关分析。结果:对176例重复患者样本的OncoBEAM和SafeSEQ突变结果的一致性分析显示,总体一致性(OPA)为99.6%,阳性一致性(PPA)为78.1%,阴性一致性(NPA)为99.9%。不一致突变(n=16)的平均MAF为0.06%(范围:0.04-0.12%)。当考虑MAF >0.1%的突变时,PPA和OPA分别增加到96.0%和99.9%。两种方法检测的突变MAF水平均表现出很强的线性相关性(R2=0.98)。在124例OncoBEAM未检测到突变的患者样本中,75例(60%)的SafeSEQ显示≥1突变。在整个小组范围内,76%和30%的突变被检测到,引文格式为:Hillary Sloane、Priya Sathyanarayan、Daniel Edelstein、Frederick Jones、Jennifer Preston、Sam Wu、Jenna Los、Lara Duchstein、Johannes Fredebohm、Katharina Wichner、Denise Heim、Frank Holtrup、Hannah Quinn、David Feller-Kopman。基于ngs的液体活检基因分型在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的临床评价[摘要]。见:美国癌症研究协会2021年年会论文集;2021年4月10日至15日和5月17日至21日。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2021;81(13 -增刊):摘要nr LB053。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abstract LB053: Clinical evaluation of NGS-based liquid biopsy genotyping in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients
Background: Access to molecular testing for metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) patients has been improved by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) based liquid biopsies (LB), which can obviate invasive procedures, expedite results, and enable serial testing. Emerging clinical applications for LB include therapeutic efficacy monitoring and minimal residual disease (MRD) detection, which demand a ctDNA assay with high sensitivity, specificity, and appropriate genomic coverage. Here we demonstrate that SafeSEQ next-generation sequencing (NGS) LB delivers equivalent performance to OncoBEAM digital PCR, a sensitive ctDNA approach that has been extensively clinically validated in pivotal trials (e.g., AURA, TIGER-X). Importantly, SafeSEQ delivers significantly expanded genomic coverage to address the need for expanding targeted therapy indications, monitoring treatment response, and detecting MRD. Methods: Whole blood samples (n=176) were collected from mNSCLC patients prior to/during treatment or at disease progression and transported to a CLIA laboratory for OncoBEAM analysis to detect mutations in EGFR (exon 19 del, L858R, T790M, C797S), KRAS (codons 12, 13, 61) and BRAF V600E. Replicate plasma aliquots were analyzed with SafeSEQ to interrogate clinically relevant regions in BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, MET, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53. Mutation level concordance between the methods was assessed, where only genomic alterations interrogated by both platforms were considered. For mutations detected by both methods, correlation analysis of mutant allelic frequency (MAF) was performed. Results: Concordance analysis of the mutation results from OncoBEAM and SafeSEQ testing of 176 replicate patient samples demonstrated an overall percent agreement (OPA) of 99.6%, with a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 78.1% and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 99.9%. The mean MAF for discordant mutations (n=16) was 0.06% (range: 0.04-0.12%). When considering mutations with MAF >0.1%, PPA and OPA increased to 96.0% and 99.9%, respectively. MAF levels for mutations detected by both methods demonstrated a strong linear correlation (R2=0.98). Of 124 patient samples having no mutation detected by OncoBEAM, 75 (60%) showed ≥1 alteration with SafeSEQ. Panel-wide, 76% and 30% of all mutations were detected at Citation Format: Hillary Sloane, Priya Sathyanarayan, Daniel Edelstein, Frederick Jones, Jennifer Preston, Sam Wu, Jenna Los, Lara Duchstein, Johannes Fredebohm, Katharina Wichner, Denise Heim, Frank Holtrup, Hannah Quinn, David Feller-Kopman. Clinical evaluation of NGS-based liquid biopsy genotyping in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB053.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract 470: Evaluation of two receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) clones by immunohistochemistry Abstract 586: Expression of CD68 on CKpos/CD45poscirculating cells in breast cancer patients: An additional hint supporting the fusion hybrid theory Abstract 401: Comparison of molecular response calculations for prediction of patient outcome Abstract LB061: On-target peripheral and tumor immune microenvironment modulation in patients treated with lacnotuzumab (anti-CSF1, MCS110) + spartalizumab Abstract 550: Cell-free DNA alterations in theAR/enhancer locus measured before AR signaling inhibition portend poor overall survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1